Molly M Gadd1, Sarah M Morris. 1. Molly M. Gadd, DNP, ACNP-BC, CWOCN, RN, St Elizabeth Healthcare, Fort Thomas, Kentucky. Sarah M. Morris, MS, Assistant Professor Research Coordinator, School of Safety, Security & Emergency Management, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, Kentucky.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine whether pressure ulcer preventive interventions are implemented when a total Braden Scale score reflects that the patient is at risk. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review was completed for 20 patients with confirmed hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPUs). SUBJECTS AND SETTING: A convenience sample of 20 patients with HAPUs confirmed by a certified wound nurse was systematically selected from 63 charts. The study setting was a 200-bed acute care facility in the Midwestern United States. METHODS: A retrospective review of 20 patient charts was conducted. Data collected included daily Braden Scale scores and subscale scores, along with pressure ulcer preventive intervention implementation for at-risk (cumulative Braden Scale scores ≤ 18) and not-at-risk (cumulative Braden Scale scores > 18) days. Data were collected both before and after pressure ulcer occurrence. The occurrence of preventive interventions was compared between at-risk and not-at-risk patient days. RESULTS: Nineteen percent of not-at-risk patient days were found to have lower subscale scores, indicating a need for focused preventive interventions. The day before an HAPU occurred, the mean Braden Scale score was 13.7 ± 2.8 (mean ± SD) for those who were provided an intervention and 18.5 ± 2.3 for those not provided an intervention (t = 3.89, P = .001). Sixty-three percent of at-risk patients received some intervention the day before an HAPU occurred, while 20% of not-at-risk patients received some intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of a pressure ulcer risk assessment tool is considered necessary for a comprehensive pressure ulcer prevention program. Planning preventive care according to the subscale scores of the Braden Scale may be more effective for prevention of HAPUs in some cases.
PURPOSE: To determine whether pressure ulcer preventive interventions are implemented when a total Braden Scale score reflects that the patient is at risk. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review was completed for 20 patients with confirmed hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPUs). SUBJECTS AND SETTING: A convenience sample of 20 patients with HAPUs confirmed by a certified wound nurse was systematically selected from 63 charts. The study setting was a 200-bed acute care facility in the Midwestern United States. METHODS: A retrospective review of 20 patient charts was conducted. Data collected included daily Braden Scale scores and subscale scores, along with pressure ulcer preventive intervention implementation for at-risk (cumulative Braden Scale scores ≤ 18) and not-at-risk (cumulative Braden Scale scores > 18) days. Data were collected both before and after pressure ulcer occurrence. The occurrence of preventive interventions was compared between at-risk and not-at-risk patient days. RESULTS: Nineteen percent of not-at-risk patient days were found to have lower subscale scores, indicating a need for focused preventive interventions. The day before an HAPU occurred, the mean Braden Scale score was 13.7 ± 2.8 (mean ± SD) for those who were provided an intervention and 18.5 ± 2.3 for those not provided an intervention (t = 3.89, P = .001). Sixty-three percent of at-risk patients received some intervention the day before an HAPU occurred, while 20% of not-at-risk patients received some intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of a pressure ulcer risk assessment tool is considered necessary for a comprehensive pressure ulcer prevention program. Planning preventive care according to the subscale scores of the Braden Scale may be more effective for prevention of HAPUs in some cases.
Authors: Stephen L Luther; Susan S Thomason; Sunil Sabharwal; Dezon K Finch; James McCart; Peter Toyinbo; Lina Bouayad; Michael E Matheny; Glenn T Gobbel; Gail Powell-Cope Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2017-01-19