Literature DB >> 25376743

Association between rim enhancement of breast cancer on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and patient outcome: impact of subtype.

Alexander M Th Schmitz1, Claudette E Loo, Jelle Wesseling, Ruud M Pijnappel, Kenneth G A Gilhuijs.   

Abstract

The heterogeneous nature of breast cancer is represented by three breast cancer subtypes associated with different patient outcome. However, within subtypes, variations still exist. Additional stratification is necessary for more individualized therapy. Functional tumor characteristics on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI may play a role. Rim enhancement of breast cancers has been associated with unfavorable pathology characteristics in the context of outcome. However, existence of a direct link is unknown. The purpose was to retrospectively determine the association between rim enhancement on DCE-MRI and long-term patient outcome, and whether it has complementary value to subtype. Preoperative DCE-MRI was performed in 556 consecutive female patients who were eligible for breast-conserving therapy. Presence of rim enhancement was assessed. Tumor characteristics were derived from resection specimens. Patients were stratified according to subtype. Association was assessed between rim enhancement and patient, pathology and treatment characteristics, recurrence-free interval and invasive disease-free survival. Median follow-up was 84 months. Patients were stratified into ER-positive/HER2-negative (N = 416), HER2-positive (N = 75), or triple-negative (N = 65) subtypes. Rim enhancement was seen in 29.0% (N = 161/556) of tumors and was associated with higher histologic grade, negative ER-status, and triple-negative subtype. Only within triple-negative tumors, an association was seen with outcome. Recurrence was lower in non-rim-enhancing tumors (N = 1/36; 2.8%) compared to rim-enhancing tumors (N = 9/28; 32.1%) (p = 0.001). Survival was higher in non-rim-enhancing tumors (N = 34/36; 94.4%) compared to rim-enhancing tumors (N = 18/28; 64.3%) (p = 0.001). Rim enhancement on DCE-MRI is associated with long-term outcome of patients with triple-negative breast cancer and may potentially serve as a prognostic biomarker in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25376743     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-3170-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  20 in total

1.  Differentiation of triple-negative breast cancer from other subtypes through whole-tumor histogram analysis on multiparametric MR imaging.

Authors:  Tianwen Xie; Qiufeng Zhao; Caixia Fu; Qianming Bai; Xiaoyan Zhou; Lihua Li; Robert Grimm; Li Liu; Yajia Gu; Weijun Peng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Usefulness of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging with a dedicated axillary sequence for the detection of axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with early ductal breast cancer.

Authors:  Hye Shin Ahn; Mijung Jang; Sun Mi Kim; Bo La Yun; Soo Hyun Lee
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Characterizing and eliminating errors in enhancement and subtraction artifacts in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI: Chemical shift artifact of the third kind.

Authors:  Jamal J Derakhshan; Elizabeth S McDonald; Evan S Siegelman; Mitchell D Schnall; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Correlation between contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast computed tomography features and prognostic staging in breast cancer.

Authors:  Wei-Mei Ma; Jiao Li; Shuang-Gang Chen; Pei-Qiang Cai; Shen Chen; Jie-Ting Chen; Chun-Yan Zhou; Ni He; Yaopan Wu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 3.629

5.  Association between dynamic contrast enhanced MRI imaging features and WHO histopathological grade in patients with invasive ductal breast cancer.

Authors:  Juan Huang; Jianqun Yu; Yulan Peng
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Features from MRI texture analysis associated with survival outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Saki Kamiya; Hiroko Satake; Yoko Hayashi; Satoko Ishigaki; Rintaro Ito; Mariko Kawamura; Toshiaki Taoka; Shingo Iwano; Shinji Naganawa
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 4.239

7.  Relating Doses of Contrast Agent Administered to TIC and Semi-Quantitative Parameters on DCE-MRI: Based on a Murine Breast Tumor Model.

Authors:  Menglin Wu; Li Lu; Qi Zhang; Qi Guo; Feixiang Zhao; Tongwei Li; Xuening Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Identifying Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Using Background Parenchymal Enhancement Heterogeneity on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI: A Pilot Radiomics Study.

Authors:  Jeff Wang; Fumi Kato; Noriko Oyama-Manabe; Ruijiang Li; Yi Cui; Khin Khin Tha; Hiroko Yamashita; Kohsuke Kudo; Hiroki Shirato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Computer-aided evaluation of the correlation between MRI morphology and immunohistochemical biomarkers or molecular subtypes in breast cancer.

Authors:  Sen Jiang; You-Jia Hong; Fan Zhang; Yang-Kang Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Heterogeneous drug penetrance of veliparib and carboplatin measured in triple negative breast tumors.

Authors:  Imke H Bartelink; Brendan Prideaux; Gregor Krings; Lisa Wilmes; Pei Rong Evelyn Lee; Pan Bo; Byron Hann; Jean-Philippe Coppé; Diane Heditsian; Lamorna Swigart-Brown; Ella F Jones; Sergey Magnitsky; Ron J Keizer; Niels de Vries; Hilde Rosing; Nela Pawlowska; Scott Thomas; Mallika Dhawan; Rahul Aggarwal; Pamela N Munster; Laura J Esserman; Weiming Ruan; Alan H B Wu; Douglas Yee; Véronique Dartois; Radojka M Savic; Denise M Wolf; Laura van 't Veer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.