Massimo Castiglioni1, Brian E Louie2, Candice L Wilshire3, Alexander S Farivar3, Ralph W Aye3, Jed Gorden3, Matthew P Horton4, Eric Vallières3. 1. Center for Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgical and Morphological Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy Division of Thoracic Surgery, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA, USA. 2. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA, USA brian.louie@swedish.org. 3. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA, USA. 4. CellNetix Pathology and Laboratories, Seattle, WA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Lepidic growth pattern lung adenocarcinoma commonly presents as a dominant lesion (DL) with associated pulmonary nodules either in the ipsilateral or contralateral lung fields, posing a challenge in clinical decision-making. These tumours may be clinically upstaged compared with those who present with solitary lesions and, as a result, may be offered different therapies. The purpose of this study is to compare recurrence rates, the development of new lesions and survival in patients with adenocarcinoma with a lepidic component presenting with a DL with or without additional nodules. METHODS: We performed a 13-year retrospective chart review of patients with lepidic growth pattern adenocarcinoma. Patients were grouped into a uninodular group (UG) if they presented with a solitary lesion and a multinodular group (MG) if they had a DL with additional nodules. Clinicopathological features, outcomes and survival between the two groups were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 149 patients were identified: 62 (42%) in the UG and 87 (58%) in the MG. In addition to the DL, 217 nodules were preoperatively identified in the MG: 60 were resected concomitantly with the DL, while 157 were radiologically surveyed. Invasive adenocarcinoma was the predominant pathological cell type in both groups. The median time of follow-up was 3 years [interquartile range (IQR) 1.9-5.1]. Local (1 vs 2%), regional (1 vs 3%) and distant recurrences (7 vs 4%) were detected, respectively, in the UG and the MG. In the UG, 20 new lesions were identified, while in the MG there were 28. Only 4 of 157 (2.5%) surveyed pre-existing lesions were found to be malignant and required further treatment. No statistically significant differences were observed in 5-year disease-free and overall survival between the UG and the MG (82.3 vs 83.8%, P = 0.254 and 86.7 vs 93.8%, P = 0.096, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We observed that patients with lepidic growth pattern adenocarcinoma presenting with a DL with associated secondary nodules appear to behave similarly to patients with a solitary lesion. Multiple nodules including those that are malignant in this specific subset of non-small-cell lung cancer should not be upstaged as advanced disease and patients should be treated with the same curative intent as those presenting with uninodular disease.
OBJECTIVES:Lepidic growth pattern lung adenocarcinoma commonly presents as a dominant lesion (DL) with associated pulmonary nodules either in the ipsilateral or contralateral lung fields, posing a challenge in clinical decision-making. These tumours may be clinically upstaged compared with those who present with solitary lesions and, as a result, may be offered different therapies. The purpose of this study is to compare recurrence rates, the development of new lesions and survival in patients with adenocarcinoma with a lepidic component presenting with a DL with or without additional nodules. METHODS: We performed a 13-year retrospective chart review of patients with lepidic growth pattern adenocarcinoma. Patients were grouped into a uninodular group (UG) if they presented with a solitary lesion and a multinodular group (MG) if they had a DL with additional nodules. Clinicopathological features, outcomes and survival between the two groups were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 149 patients were identified: 62 (42%) in the UG and 87 (58%) in the MG. In addition to the DL, 217 nodules were preoperatively identified in the MG: 60 were resected concomitantly with the DL, while 157 were radiologically surveyed. Invasive adenocarcinoma was the predominant pathological cell type in both groups. The median time of follow-up was 3 years [interquartile range (IQR) 1.9-5.1]. Local (1 vs 2%), regional (1 vs 3%) and distant recurrences (7 vs 4%) were detected, respectively, in the UG and the MG. In the UG, 20 new lesions were identified, while in the MG there were 28. Only 4 of 157 (2.5%) surveyed pre-existing lesions were found to be malignant and required further treatment. No statistically significant differences were observed in 5-year disease-free and overall survival between the UG and the MG (82.3 vs 83.8%, P = 0.254 and 86.7 vs 93.8%, P = 0.096, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We observed that patients with lepidic growth pattern adenocarcinoma presenting with a DL with associated secondary nodules appear to behave similarly to patients with a solitary lesion. Multiple nodules including those that are malignant in this specific subset of non-small-cell lung cancer should not be upstaged as advanced disease and patients should be treated with the same curative intent as those presenting with uninodular disease.
Authors: Massimo Castiglioni; Brian E Louie; Candice L Wilshire; Alexander S Farivar; Ralph W Aye; Jed Gorden; Matthew P Horton; Eric Vallières Journal: Front Surg Date: 2015-01-12