Literature DB >> 25376145

Craniofacial reconstruction with poly(methyl methacrylate) customized cranial implants.

Gary J Huang1, Susan Zhong, Srinivas M Susarla, Edward W Swanson, Judy Huang, Chad R Gordon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Secondary cranioplasty with customized craniofacial implants (CCIs) are often used to restore cerebral protection and reverse syndromes of the trephined, and for reconstruction of acquired cranial deformities. The 2 most widely used implant materials are polyetheretherketone and poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA). Previous series with CCIs report several major complications, including implant infection leading to removal, extended hospital stays, and surgical revisions. With this in mind, we chose to review our large case series of 22 consecutive PMMA CCI cranioplasties treated by a single craniofacial surgeon.
METHODS: A cohort of 20 consecutive patients receiving 22 PMMA implants during a 2-year period was identified and outcomes reviewed. The mechanism of initial insult, time from craniectomy to cranioplasty, anesthesia time, major and minor postoperative complications, radiation history, and length of follow-up were statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: There were no complications related to infection, hematoma/seroma, or cerebrospinal fluid leak (0/22, 0%). Two patients experienced major complications related to persistent temporal hollowing (PTH) following standard CCI cranioplasty, which required revision surgery with modified implants (2/22, 9%). One minor complication of self-resolving transient diplopia was noted (1/22, 5%).
CONCLUSIONS: In this consecutive series, PMMA CCIs were associated with a very low complication rate, suggesting that PMMA may be a preferred material for CCI fabrication. However, with 10% (2/20) of patients experiencing PTH and dissatisfaction related to asymmetry, future research must be directed at modifying CCI shape, to address the overlying soft-tissue deformity. If successful, this may increase patient satisfaction, prevent PTH, and avoid additional costs of revision surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25376145     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  11 in total

1.  Automated Implant Resizing for Single-Stage Cranioplasty.

Authors:  Shuya Liu; Wei-Lun Huang; Chad Gordon; Mehran Armand
Journal:  IEEE Robot Autom Lett       Date:  2021-07-07

2.  Single-Step Resection of Sphenoorbital Meningiomas and Orbital Reconstruction Using Customized CAD/CAM Implants.

Authors:  Lukas Goertz; Pantelis Stavrinou; George Stranjalis; Marco Timmer; Roland Goldbrunner; Boris Krischek
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-03-01

3.  Levofloxacin loaded mesoporous silica microspheres/nano-hydroxyapatite/polyurethane composite scaffold for the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis with bone defects.

Authors:  Qi Wang; Cheng Chen; Wen Liu; Xiaoqiang He; Nian Zhou; Dongli Zhang; Hongchen Gu; Jidong Li; Jiaxing Jiang; Wei Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Finite element analysis of 6 large PMMA skull reconstructions: A multi-criteria evaluation approach.

Authors:  Angela Ridwan-Pramana; Petr Marcián; Libor Borák; Nathaniel Narra; Tymour Forouzanfar; Jan Wolff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Functional and aesthetic evaluation after cranial reconstruction with polymethyl methacrylate prostheses using low-cost 3D printing templates in patients with cranial defects secondary to decompressive craniectomies: A prospective study.

Authors:  Juan Pablo Borges Rodrigues Maricevich; Auricelio B Cezar-Junior; Edilson Xavier de Oliveira-Junior; Jose Arthur Morais Veras E Silva; Jorge Vicente Lopes da Silva; Amanda Amorin Nunes; Nivaldo S Almeida; Hildo Rocha Cirne Azevedo-Filho
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2019-01-15

6.  Virtual Surgical Planning for Oncologic Mandibular and Maxillary Reconstruction.

Authors:  Paige L Myers; Jonas A Nelson; Evan B Rosen; Robert J Allen; Joseph J Disa; Evan Matros
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-09-17

7.  Early experience with patient-specific low-cost 3D-printed polymethylmethacrylate cranioplasty implants in a lower-middle-income-country: Technical note and economic analysis.

Authors:  Mohammad Ashraf; Nabeel Choudhary; Usman Ahmad Kamboh; Muhammad Asif Raza; Kashif Ali Sultan; Naseeruddin Ghulam; Syed Shahzad Hussain; Naveed Ashraf
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2022-06-23

8.  Clinical Application of Three-Dimensional Printing of Polycaprolactone/Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate Implants for Cranial Reconstruction.

Authors:  Hojin Park; Jong Woo Choi; Woo Shik Jeong
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 1.172

9.  Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Cranioplasty Implants.

Authors:  Adam Binhammer; Josie Jakubowski; Oleh Antonyshyn; Paul Binhammer
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 0.947

10.  Comparison of the mechanical properties of biodegradable and titanium osteosynthesis systems used in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Barzi Gareb; Charlotte C Roossien; Nico B van Bakelen; Gijsbertus J Verkerke; Arjan Vissink; Ruud R M Bos; Baucke van Minnen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.