| Literature DB >> 25374942 |
Neena Singla1, Swati Challana1.
Abstract
The aim of study was to investigate the toxic effect of triptolide fed in bait on reproduction of male house rat, Rattus rattus. Feeding of cereal based bait containing 0.2% triptolide to male R. rattus for 5 days in no-choice feeding test, leading to mean daily ingestion of 20.45 mg/kg bw of triptolide, was found effective in significantly (P ≤ 0.05) reducing sperm motility and viability in cauda epididymal fluid by 80.65 and 75.14%, respectively, from that of untreated rats. Pregnancy rates were decreased by 100% in untreated cyclic female rats paired with male rats treated with 0.2% triptolide. Present studies suggest the potential of 0.2% triptolide bait in regulating reproductive output of R. rattus.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25374942 PMCID: PMC4211135 DOI: 10.1155/2014/879405
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Acceptance of bait containing different concentrations of triptolide fed to male R. rattus in laboratory for 5 days in no-choice feeding test.
| Groups ( | Concentration in bait (%) | Body weight (g) | Acceptance of treated bait over plain bait (%) | Total ingestion of triptolide (mg/kg bw) | Mean daily ingestion of triptolide (mg/kg bw) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | 0.0 | 152.5 ± 21.9 | — | — | — |
| II∗ | 0.1 | 155.0 ± 20.6 | 93.0 ± 5.7a | 53.6 ± 7.6a | 10.8 ± 1.5a |
| III | 0.2 | 145.0 ± 15.0 | 78.8 ± 2.6b | 102.2 ± 10.3b | 20.4 ± 2.1b |
| IV | 0.3 | 185.0 ± 30.8 | 75.9 ± 16.8b | 113.0 ± 15.4b | 22.6 ± 3.1b |
Values are mean ± SD, n = number of rats, and N = number of days. ∗One rat died at the end of treatment. Values with different superscripts a–b in a column differ significantly at P ≤ 0.05.
Figure 1Mean daily consumption of WSO bait during pre- and posttreatment periods by different groups of rats.
Effect of triptolide treatment on reproductive performance of male R. rattus paired with untreated cyclic female rats.
| Group ( | Conc. in bait (%) | Body weight (g) | Females delivered pups (% pregnancy rate) | Pups delivered/foetuses seen | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male rats | Female rats | ||||
| I | 0.0 | 160.00 ± 23.50 | 137.60 ± 10.65 | 3/3 (100%) | 7.73 ± 2.05 (5, 7, 10 foetuses) |
| II | 0.1 | 141.50 ± 18.50 | 131.50 ± 16.50 | 1/3 (33.33%) | 8 pups |
| III | 0.2 | 154.00 ± 26.50 | 137.60 ± 18.50 | 0/3 (0%) | nil |
| IV | 0.3 | 175.60 ± 8.65 | 160.00 ± 7.11 | 2/3 (66.67%) | 5.00 ± 0.00 (5, 5 pups) |
Values are mean ± SD; n = number of rats.
Effect of triptolide treatment on weights of reproductive organs and accessory sex glands of male R. rattus.
| Group ( | Conc. in bait (%) | Organ weight (g/100 g bw) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Testis | Epididymis | Seminal vesicles | Prostate gland | ||
| I | 0.0 | 0.72 ± 0.18a | 0.51 ± 0.24a | 0.70 ± 0.24a | 0.24 ± 0.08a |
| II ( | 0.1 | 0.54 ± 0.10a | 0.38 ± 0.13a | 0.62 ± 0.15a | 0.19 ± 0.06a |
| III | 0.2 | 0.74 ± 0.26a | 0.55 ± 0.33a | 0.69 ± 0.33a | 0.22 ± 0.15a |
| IV | 0.3 | 0.60 ± 0.16a | 0.39 ± 0.11a | 0.52 ± 0.32a | 0.12 ± 0.04a |
Values are mean ± SD; n = number of rats; amean values in a column sharing common superscript do not differ significantly (P ≤ 0.05).
Effect of triptolide treatment on sperm parameters in cauda epididymal fluid of male R. rattus.
| Group ( | Conc. in bait (%) | Sperm motility (%) | Sperm viability (%) | Sperm density (millions/mL) | Sperm abnormality (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head tail separation | Other abnormalities | |||||
| I | 0.0 | 51.67 ± 7.45a | 58.33 ± 7.45a | 148.33 ± 62.23a | 10.00 ± 4.08a | 2.58 ± 0.93a |
| II ( | 0.1 | 22.00 ± 11.66b | 25.00 ± 9.49b | 84.00 ± 26.34a | 52.95 ± 18.53b | 11.42 ± 3.26b |
| III | 0.2 | 10.00 ± 6.45c | 14.50 ± 7.27c | 90.83 ± 37.12a | 46.13 ± 12.15b | 13.71 ± 4.12b |
| IV | 0.3 | 23.33 ± 10.67b | 25.83 ± 9.75b | 130.00 ± 71.82a | 53.69 ± 24.57b | 8.69 ± 5.74b |
Values are mean ± SD; n = number of rats; a–cmean values in a column not sharing a common superscript differ significantly (P ≤ 0.05).
Figure 2Percent reductions in values of different sperm parameters in groups of rats treated with triptolide from that of untreated group.
Figure 3(a–d) Cauda epididymal fluid smear of untreated rats and rats treated with triptolide showing sperm head tail separation. (a) Sperms with head tail separation (short arrow) and midpiece coiling (long arrow) observed in cauda epididymal fluid of treated rat under light microscope at 400x, (b) sperms with no head tail separation observed in cauda epididymal fluid of untreated rat under SEM at 15.0 kV 9.6 mm × 600 SE, (c) sperms with head tail separation observed in cauda epididymal fluid of treated rat under SEM at 15.0 kV 9.9 mm × 1.70 k SE, and (d) sperms with head tail separation observed in cauda epididymal fluid of treated rat under SEM at 15.0 kV 9.9 mm × 10 k SE. Arrow indicates region of separation of middle piece.