Literature DB >> 25374928

Description and validation of realistic and structured endourology training model.

Federico Soria1, Esther Morcillo1, Juan Luis Sanz2, Alberto Budia3, Alvaro Serrano2, Francisco M Sanchez-Margallo4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to validate a model of training, which combines the use of non-biological and ex vivo biological bench models, as well as the modelling of urological injuries for endourological treatment in a porcine animal model.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 40 participants took part in this study. The duration of the activity was 16 hours. The model of training was divided into 3 levels: level I, concerning the acquisition of basic theoretical knowledge; level II, involving practice with the bench models and level III, concerning practice in the porcine animal model. First, trainees practiced with animals without using a model of injured (ureteroscopy, management of guide wires and catheters under fluoroscopic control) and later practiced in lithiasic animal model. During the activity, an evaluation of the face and content validity was conducted, as well as constructive validation provided by the trainees versus experts. Evolution of the variables during the course within each group was analysed using the Student's t test for paired samples, while comparisons between groups, were performed using the Student's t test for unpaired samples.
RESULTS: The assessments of face and content validity were satisfactory. The constructive validation, "within one trainee" shows that were statistical significant differences between the first time the trainees performed the tasks in the animal model and the last time, mainly in the knowledge of procedure and Holmium laser lithotripsy cathegories. At the beginning of level III, there are also statistical significant differences between trainee's scores and the expert's scores.
CONCLUSIONS: This realistic Endourology training model allows the acquisition of knowledge and technical and non-technical skills as evidenced by the face, content and constructive validity. Structured use of bench models (biological and non biological) and animal model simulators increase the endourological basic skills.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endourology; animal model; bench model; training; validation

Year:  2014        PMID: 25374928      PMCID: PMC4219312     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol        ISSN: 2330-1910


  19 in total

1.  Porcine urinary tract as a training model for ureteroscopy.

Authors:  W L Strohmaier; A Giese
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Assessment of basic endoscopic performance using a virtual reality simulator.

Authors:  David M Wilhelm; Kenneth Ogan; Claus G Roehrborn; Jeffery A Cadeddu; Margaret S Pearle
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  [Experimental study with Doppler ultrasound in partial chronic obstructive uropathy].

Authors:  E Morcillo; C Martín; L A Rioja; M Pamplona; F M Sánchez-Margallo; F Soria
Journal:  Actas Urol Esp       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 0.994

4.  Training on bench models improves dexterity in ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Marianne Brehmer; Robert Swartz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 5.  Ureteroscopy and cystoscopy simulation in urology.

Authors:  James D Watterson; John D Denstedt
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 6.  Surgical simulation: a urological perspective.

Authors:  Geoffrey R Wignall; John D Denstedt; Glenn M Preminger; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Margaret S Pearle; Robert M Sweet; Elspeth M McDougall
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  The future of British urology.

Authors:  A R Mundy
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1998-10

Review 8.  Effectiveness of procedural simulation in urology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kamran Ahmed; Muhammed Jawad; May Abboudi; Andrea Gavazzi; Ara Darzi; Thanos Athanasiou; Justin Vale; Mohammad Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Virtual ureteroscopy predicts ureteroscopic proficiency of medical students on a cadaver.

Authors:  Kenneth Ogan; Lucas Jacomides; Michael J Shulman; Claus G Roehrborn; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Margaret S Pearle
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Validation and implementation of surgical simulators: a critical review of present, past, and future.

Authors:  B M A Schout; A J M Hendrikx; F Scheele; B L H Bemelmans; A J J A Scherpbier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  4 in total

1.  Construction of a novel rabbit model of ureteral calculi implanted with flowable resin.

Authors:  Hao Su; Heng Liu; Ke Yang; Weiming Chen; Dongbo Yuan; Wei Wang; Guohua Zhu; Bin Hu; Kehua Jiang; Jianguo Zhu
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.090

Review 2.  Simulation-based training and assessment in urological surgery.

Authors:  Abdullatif Aydin; Nicholas Raison; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta; Kamran Ahmed
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Non-technical skills: a review of training and evaluation in urology.

Authors:  Cora Griffin; Abdullatif Aydın; Oliver Brunckhorst; Nicholas Raison; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta; Kamran Ahmed
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  The SIMULATE ureteroscopy training curriculum: educational value and transfer of skills.

Authors:  Abdullatif Aydın; Kamran Ahmed; Umair Baig; Nicholas Raison; Andrea G Lantz Powers; Nicola Macchione; Ahmed Al-Jabir; Takashige Abe; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 4.226

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.