Gary S McDowell1,2, Christopher J Hindley3,4, Guy Lippens5, Isabelle Landrieu6, Anna Philpott7. 1. Department of Oncology, MRC/Hutchison Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0XZ, UK. Gary.McDowell@tufts.edu. 2. Current address: Center for Regenerative and Developmental Biology, Department of Biology, Tufts University, 200 Boston Avenue, Medford, MA, 02155, USA. Gary.McDowell@tufts.edu. 3. Department of Oncology, MRC/Hutchison Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0XZ, UK. cjh87@cam.ac.uk. 4. Current address: The Gurdon Institute, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 1QN, UK. cjh87@cam.ac.uk. 5. CNRS, Université de Lille 1, UMR 8576, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France. Guy.Lippens@univ-lille1.fr. 6. CNRS, Université de Lille 1, UMR 8576, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France. Isabelle.Landrieu@univ-lille1.fr. 7. Department of Oncology, MRC/Hutchison Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0XZ, UK. ap113@cam.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neuronal differentiation is largely under the control of basic Helix-Loop-Helix (bHLH) proneural transcription factors that play key roles during development of the embryonic nervous system. In addition to well-characterised regulation of their expression, increasing evidence is emerging for additional post-translational regulation of proneural protein activity. Of particular interest is the bHLH proneural factor Neurogenin2 (Ngn2), which orchestrates progression from neural progenitor to differentiated neuron in several regions of the central nervous system. Previous studies have demonstrated a key role for cell cycle-dependent multi-site phosphorylation of Ngn2 protein at Serine-Proline (SP) sites for regulation of its neuronal differentiation activity, although the potential structural and functional consequences of phosphorylation at different regions of the protein are unclear. RESULTS: Here we characterise the role of phosphorylation of specific regions of Ngn2 on the stability of Ngn2 protein and on its neuronal differentiation activity in vivo in the developing embryo, demonstrating clearly that the location of SP sites is less important than the number of SP sites available for control of Ngn2 activity in vivo. We also provide structural evidence that Ngn2 contains large, intrinsically disordered regions that undergo phosphorylation by cyclin-dependent kinases (cdks). CONCLUSIONS: Phosphorylation of Ngn2 occurs in both the N- and C-terminal regions, either side of the conserved basic Helix-Loop-Helix domain. While these phosphorylation events do not change the intrinsic stability of Ngn2, phosphorylation on multiple sites acts to limit its ability to drive neuronal differentiation in vivo. Phosphorylated regions of Ngn2 are predicted to be intrinsically disordered and cdk-dependent phosphorylation of these intrinsically disordered regions contributes to Ngn2 regulation.
BACKGROUND: Neuronal differentiation is largely under the control of basic Helix-Loop-Helix (bHLH) proneural transcription factors that play key roles during development of the embryonic nervous system. In addition to well-characterised regulation of their expression, increasing evidence is emerging for additional post-translational regulation of proneural protein activity. Of particular interest is the bHLH proneural factor Neurogenin2 (Ngn2), which orchestrates progression from neural progenitor to differentiated neuron in several regions of the central nervous system. Previous studies have demonstrated a key role for cell cycle-dependent multi-site phosphorylation of Ngn2 protein at Serine-Proline (SP) sites for regulation of its neuronal differentiation activity, although the potential structural and functional consequences of phosphorylation at different regions of the protein are unclear. RESULTS: Here we characterise the role of phosphorylation of specific regions of Ngn2 on the stability of Ngn2 protein and on its neuronal differentiation activity in vivo in the developing embryo, demonstrating clearly that the location of SP sites is less important than the number of SP sites available for control of Ngn2 activity in vivo. We also provide structural evidence that Ngn2 contains large, intrinsically disordered regions that undergo phosphorylation by cyclin-dependent kinases (cdks). CONCLUSIONS: Phosphorylation of Ngn2 occurs in both the N- and C-terminal regions, either side of the conserved basic Helix-Loop-Helix domain. While these phosphorylation events do not change the intrinsic stability of Ngn2, phosphorylation on multiple sites acts to limit its ability to drive neuronal differentiation in vivo. Phosphorylated regions of Ngn2 are predicted to be intrinsically disordered and cdk-dependent phosphorylation of these intrinsically disordered regions contributes to Ngn2 regulation.
Authors: Celeste J Brown; Sachiko Takayama; Andrew M Campen; Pam Vise; Thomas W Marshall; Christopher J Oldfield; Christopher J Williams; A Keith Dunker Journal: J Mol Evol Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 2.395
Authors: W G Kaelin; W Krek; W R Sellers; J A DeCaprio; F Ajchenbaum; C S Fuchs; T Chittenden; Y Li; P J Farnham; M A Blanar Journal: Cell Date: 1992-07-24 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: K Gast; H Damaschun; K Eckert; K Schulze-Forster; H R Maurer; M Müller-Frohne; D Zirwer; J Czarnecki; G Damaschun Journal: Biochemistry Date: 1995-10-10 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Pierre Mattar; Olivier Britz; Christine Johannes; Marta Nieto; Lin Ma; Angela Rebeyka; Natalia Klenin; Franck Polleux; François Guillemot; Carol Schuurmans Journal: Dev Biol Date: 2004-09-15 Impact factor: 3.582
Authors: Lilia M Iakoucheva; Predrag Radivojac; Celeste J Brown; Timothy R O'Connor; Jason G Sikes; Zoran Obradovic; A Keith Dunker Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2004-02-11 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: David Aguado-Llera; Erik Goormaghtigh; Natalie de Geest; Xiao-Jiang Quan; Alicia Prieto; Bassen A Hassan; Javier Gómez; José L Neira Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2010-03-02 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Lorenzo Baronti; Tomáš Hošek; Sergio Gil-Caballero; Hadas Raveh-Amit; Eduardo O Calçada; Isabel Ayala; András Dinnyés; Isabella C Felli; Roberta Pierattelli; Bernhard Brutscher Journal: Biophys J Date: 2017-04-11 Impact factor: 4.033
Authors: Kathryn B Moore; Mary A Logan; Issam Aldiri; Jacqueline M Roberts; Michael Steele; Monica L Vetter Journal: Dev Biol Date: 2018-03-05 Impact factor: 3.582
Authors: Marta Kolonko; Katarzyna Ożga; Rafał Hołubowicz; Michał Taube; Maciej Kozak; Andrzej Ożyhar; Beata Greb-Markiewicz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Andreas Sagner; Zachary B Gaber; Julien Delile; Jennifer H Kong; David L Rousso; Caroline A Pearson; Steven E Weicksel; Manuela Melchionda; S Neda Mousavy Gharavy; James Briscoe; Bennett G Novitch Journal: PLoS Biol Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 8.029