Dragana B Davidović1, Dragan V Tomić2, Katarina Ž Paunović1, Nadja D Vasiljević1, Jagoda B Jorga1. 1. 1Institute for Hygiene and Medical Ecology, Faculty of Medicine,University of Belgrade,Dr Subotića 8,11000 Belgrade,Serbia. 2. 2Clinic for Gastroenterology and Hepatology,Clinical Centre of Serbia, Faculty of Medicine,University of Belgrade,Belgrade,Serbia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the presence of nutrition labels on pre-packaged food products, as well as to analyse the types of presentation. DESIGN: This was a descriptive study. The following characteristics were analysed: (i) presence and placement of the nutrition declaration (either as front-of-pack (FOP) or back-of-pack (BOP)); (ii) content of the presented information; (iii) presence of nutrition and health claims; and (iv) legibility of the written information. Settings Three different types of retailers in Belgrade, Serbia. SUBJECTS: A total of 2138 pre-packaged food products from ten categories. RESULTS: A nutrition declaration was found on 65.9% of all tested products. It was displayed on the back of the packaging of 62.7% of products and on the front of the packaging of 19.1% of products. BOP was the most commonly observed in breakfast cereals, soft drinks, milk and instant soups (in total over 90%), and the least common in meat products (21.5%). FOP was predominantly displayed on breakfast cereals (65.0%) and the least frequently on milk products (2.4%). The 'Big 4' (energy value, protein, carbohydrate and fat contents) and the 'Big 4 with additional information' figured on 40.9% of products. The 'Big 8' ('Big 4' plus sugar, saturated fat, fibre and sodium contents) and the 'Big 8 with additional information' were present less frequently (20.5%). Nutrition claims and health claims appeared on very few products (6.6% and 6.3%, respectively). The proportion of products with insufficient legibility was 31.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Nutrition labelling in Belgrade, Serbia is not satisfactory. Mandatory regulations may be the best way to improve the current situation.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the presence of nutrition labels on pre-packaged food products, as well as to analyse the types of presentation. DESIGN: This was a descriptive study. The following characteristics were analysed: (i) presence and placement of the nutrition declaration (either as front-of-pack (FOP) or back-of-pack (BOP)); (ii) content of the presented information; (iii) presence of nutrition and health claims; and (iv) legibility of the written information. Settings Three different types of retailers in Belgrade, Serbia. SUBJECTS: A total of 2138 pre-packaged food products from ten categories. RESULTS: A nutrition declaration was found on 65.9% of all tested products. It was displayed on the back of the packaging of 62.7% of products and on the front of the packaging of 19.1% of products. BOP was the most commonly observed in breakfast cereals, soft drinks, milk and instant soups (in total over 90%), and the least common in meat products (21.5%). FOP was predominantly displayed on breakfast cereals (65.0%) and the least frequently on milk products (2.4%). The 'Big 4' (energy value, protein, carbohydrate and fat contents) and the 'Big 4 with additional information' figured on 40.9% of products. The 'Big 8' ('Big 4' plus sugar, saturated fat, fibre and sodium contents) and the 'Big 8 with additional information' were present less frequently (20.5%). Nutrition claims and health claims appeared on very few products (6.6% and 6.3%, respectively). The proportion of products with insufficient legibility was 31.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Nutrition labelling in Belgrade, Serbia is not satisfactory. Mandatory regulations may be the best way to improve the current situation.
Authors: Nyamragchaa Chimedtseren; Bridget Kelly; Anne-Therese McMahon; Heather Yeatman Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-13 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Sophie Hieke; Nera Kuljanic; Igor Pravst; Krista Miklavec; Asha Kaur; Kerry A Brown; Bernadette M Egan; Katja Pfeifer; Azucena Gracia; Mike Rayner Journal: Nutrients Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 5.717