E Yoshioka1, S J Hanley2, Y Kawanishi1, Y Saijo1. 1. Department of Health Science,Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa,Japan. 2. Department of Women's Health Medicine,Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine,Sapporo,Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known about whether particular suicide methods have contributed differently to the recent unfavourable suicide mortality trends in Japan. Analysing such trends may shed light on the effect of potentially preventable factors, such as the impact of restricting access to certain popular suicide methods, on overall rates. Therefore, we assessed recent trends in method-specific suicide by gender and age in Japan. METHOD: Suicide mortality and population data between 1990 and 2011 were obtained from the Vital Statistics of Japan and used to calculate method-specific mortality rates. Suicide methods were divided into seven groups: overdose, gases, hanging, drowning, cutting, jumping and other means. Age was divided into four groups: 15-24, 25-44, 45-64 and 65+ years. We applied joinpoint regression to the data and quantified the observed changes. RESULTS: The results of the joinpoint regression analyses showed a sharp increase in overall suicide rates for males and females of all ages until the late 1990s. Suicide from hanging and jumping, in particular, contributed to this increase. After 2000, an increasing trend in overall suicide rates in both males and females aged 15-24 and 25-44 years was observed, with overdose, gases and hanging contributing to this increasing trend. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings revealed that different suicide methods varied in their contribution to the recent overall suicide transition in Japan. Regarding factors associated with the recent increase in suicides by overdose, gases, hanging and jumping, further research is needed in order to promote and implement effective means restriction strategies.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about whether particular suicide methods have contributed differently to the recent unfavourable suicide mortality trends in Japan. Analysing such trends may shed light on the effect of potentially preventable factors, such as the impact of restricting access to certain popular suicide methods, on overall rates. Therefore, we assessed recent trends in method-specific suicide by gender and age in Japan. METHOD: Suicide mortality and population data between 1990 and 2011 were obtained from the Vital Statistics of Japan and used to calculate method-specific mortality rates. Suicide methods were divided into seven groups: overdose, gases, hanging, drowning, cutting, jumping and other means. Age was divided into four groups: 15-24, 25-44, 45-64 and 65+ years. We applied joinpoint regression to the data and quantified the observed changes. RESULTS: The results of the joinpoint regression analyses showed a sharp increase in overall suicide rates for males and females of all ages until the late 1990s. Suicide from hanging and jumping, in particular, contributed to this increase. After 2000, an increasing trend in overall suicide rates in both males and females aged 15-24 and 25-44 years was observed, with overdose, gases and hanging contributing to this increasing trend. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings revealed that different suicide methods varied in their contribution to the recent overall suicide transition in Japan. Regarding factors associated with the recent increase in suicides by overdose, gases, hanging and jumping, further research is needed in order to promote and implement effective means restriction strategies.
Entities:
Keywords:
Epidemiology; methods; suicide; time trends
Authors: J John Mann; Alan Apter; Jose Bertolote; Annette Beautrais; Dianne Currier; Ann Haas; Ulrich Hegerl; Jouko Lonnqvist; Kevin Malone; Andrej Marusic; Lars Mehlum; George Patton; Michael Phillips; Wolfgang Rutz; Zoltan Rihmer; Armin Schmidtke; David Shaffer; Morton Silverman; Yoshitomo Takahashi; Airi Varnik; Danuta Wasserman; Paul Yip; Herbert Hendin Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-10-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Shu-Sen Chang; David Gunnell; Jonathan A C Sterne; Tsung-Hsueh Lu; Andrew T A Cheng Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2009-02-04 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Jeffrey A Bridge; Joel B Greenhouse; Arielle H Sheftall; Anthony Fabio; John V Campo; Kelly J Kelleher Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2010-01-13 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Chee Hon Chan; Eric D Caine; Shu Sen Chang; Won Jin Lee; Eun Shil Cha; Paul Siu Fai Yip Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-05-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Yolanda Mejías-Martín; Juan de Dios Luna Del Castillo; Candela Rodríguez-Mejías; Celia Martí-García; Juan Pablo Valencia-Quintero; María Paz García-Caro Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 3.390