Literature DB >> 25373494

A review of finite size effects in quasi-zero dimensional superconductors.

Sangita Bose1, Pushan Ayyub.   

Abstract

Quantum confinement and surface effects (SEs) dramatically modify most solid state phenomena as one approaches the nanometer scale, and superconductivity is no exception. Though we may expect significant modifications from bulk superconducting properties when the system dimensions become smaller than the characteristic length scales for bulk superconductors-such as the coherence length or the penetration depth-it is now established that there is a third length scale which ultimately determines the critical size at which Cooper pairing is destroyed. In quasi-zero-dimensional (0D) superconductors (e.g. nanocrystalline materials, isolated or embedded nanoparticles), one may define a critical particle diameter below which the mean energy level spacing arising from quantum confinement becomes equal to the bulk superconducting energy gap. The so-called Anderson criterion provides a remarkably accurate estimate of the limiting size for the destabilization of superconductivity in nanosystems. This review of size effects in quasi-0D superconductors is organized as follows. A general summary of size effects in nanostructured superconductors (section 1) is followed by a brief overview of their synthesis (section 2) and characterization using a variety of techniques (section 3). Section 4 reviews the size-evolution of important superconducting parameters-the transition temperature, critical fields and critical current-as the Anderson limit is approached from above. We then discuss the effect of thermodynamic fluctuations (section 5), which become significant in confined systems. Improvements in fabrication methods and the increasing feasibility of addressing individual nanoparticles using scanning probe techniques have lately opened up new directions in the study of nanoscale superconductivity. Section 6 reviews both experimental and theoretical aspects of the recently discovered phenomena of 'parity effect' and 'shell effect' that lead to a strong, non-monotonic size dependence of the superconducting energy gap and associated properties. Finally, we discuss in section 7 the properties of ordered heterostructures (bilayers and multilayers of alternating superconducting and normal phases) and disordered heterostructures (nanocomposites consisting of superconducting and normal phases), which are primarily controlled by the proximity effect.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25373494     DOI: 10.1088/0034-4885/77/11/116503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rep Prog Phys        ISSN: 0034-4885


  5 in total

1.  Artificial heavy fermions in a van der Waals heterostructure.

Authors:  Viliam Vaňo; Mohammad Amini; Somesh C Ganguli; Guangze Chen; Jose L Lado; Shawulienu Kezilebieke; Peter Liljeroth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Substrate mediated nitridation of niobium into superconducting Nb2N thin films for phase slip study.

Authors:  Bikash Gajar; Sachin Yadav; Deepika Sawle; Kamlesh K Maurya; Anurag Gupta; R P Aloysius; Sangeeta Sahoo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  The morphologic correlation between vortex transformation and upper critical field line in opal-based nanocomposites.

Authors:  M K Lee; E V Charnaya; S Mühlbauer; U Jeng; L J Chang; Yu A Kumzerov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Confinement-Engineered Superconductor to Correlated-Insulator Transition in a van der Waals Monolayer.

Authors:  Somesh Chandra Ganguli; Viliam Vaňo; Shawulienu Kezilebieke; Jose L Lado; Peter Liljeroth
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 11.189

5.  Phonon limited superconducting correlations in metallic nanograins.

Authors:  M D Croitoru; A A Shanenko; A Vagov; M V Milošević; V M Axt; F M Peeters
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.