Literature DB >> 25372701

Developmental immunotoxicity of chemicals in rodents and its possible regulatory impact.

Ellen V S Hessel1, Elisa C M Tonk, Peter M J Bos, Henk van Loveren, Aldert H Piersma.   

Abstract

Around 25% of the children in developed countries are affected with immune-based diseases. Juvenile onset diseases such as allergic, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases have shown increasing prevalences in the last decades. The role of chemical exposures in these phenomena is unclear. It is thought that the developmental immune system is more susceptible to toxicants than the mature situation. Developmental immunotoxicity (DIT) testing is nowadays not or minimally included in regulatory toxicology requirements. We reviewed whether developmental immune parameters in rodents would provide relatively sensitive endpoints of toxicity, whose inclusion in regulatory toxicity testing might improve hazard identification and risk assessment of chemicals. For each of the nine reviewed toxicants, the developing immune system was found to be at least as sensitive or more sensitive than the general (developmental) toxicity parameters. Functional immune (antigen-challenged) parameters appear more affected than structural (non-challenged) immune parameters. Especially, antibody responses to immune challenges with keyhole limpet hemocyanine or sheep red blood cells and delayed-type hypersensitivity responses appear to provide sensitive parameters of developmental immune toxicity. Comparison with current tolerable daily intakes (TDI) and their underlying overall no observed adverse effect levels showed that for some of the compounds reviewed, the TDI may need reconsideration based on developmental immune parameters. From these data, it can be concluded that the developing immune system is very sensitive to the disruption of toxicants independent of study design. Consideration of including functional DIT parameters in current hazard identification guidelines and wider application of relevant study protocols is warranted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DEHP; DOTC; EOGRTS; Ethanol; MeHg; OECD 443; allergy; developmental immunotoxicity; immune system; juvenile; rat

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25372701     DOI: 10.3109/10408444.2014.959163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol        ISSN: 1040-8444            Impact factor:   5.635


  4 in total

1.  Assessment of recent developmental immunotoxicity studies with bisphenol A in the context of the 2015 EFSA t-TDI.

Authors:  Ellen V S Hessel; Janine Ezendam; Fleur A van Broekhuizen; Betty Hakkert; Jamie DeWitt; Berit Granum; Laurence Guzylack; B Paige Lawrence; Andre Penninks; Andrew A Rooney; Aldert H Piersma; Henk van Loveren
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 3.143

Review 2.  Immunomodulation and exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances: an overview of the current evidence from animal and human studies.

Authors:  Evangelia Antoniou; Thomas Colnot; Maurice Zeegers; Wolfgang Dekant
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 6.168

3.  Analysis of Lipid Metabolism, Immune Function, and Neurobehavior in Adult C57BL/6JxFVB Mice After Developmental Exposure to di (2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate.

Authors:  Liana Bastos Sales; Joantine C J van Esterik; Hennie M Hodemaekers; Marja H Lamoree; Timo Hamers; Leo T M van der Ven; Juliette Legler
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 5.555

4.  Investigating Molecular Mechanisms of Immunotoxicity and the Utility of ToxCast for Immunotoxicity Screening of Chemicals Added to Food.

Authors:  Olga V Naidenko; David Q Andrews; Alexis M Temkin; Tasha Stoiber; Uloma Igara Uche; Sydney Evans; Sean Perrone-Gray
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.