IMPORTANCE: Problem adaptation therapy (PATH) is a treatment for older adults with major depression, cognitive impairment (from mild cognitive deficits to moderate dementia), and disability. Antidepressants have limited efficacy in this population and psychosocial interventions are inadequately investigated. OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of 12-week PATH vs supportive therapy for cognitively impaired patients (ST-CI) in reducing depression and disability in 74 older adults with major depression, cognitive impairment, and disability. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized clinical trial at the Weill Cornell Institute of Geriatric Psychiatry from April 1, 2006, to September 31, 2011. Interventions were administered at the participants' homes. Participants included 74 older individuals (age ≥ 65 years) with major depression and cognitive impairment to the level of moderate dementia. They were recruited through collaborating community agencies of Weill Cornell Institute of Geriatric Psychiatry and were randomly assigned to 12 weekly sessions of PATH or ST-CI (14.8% attrition rate). INTERVENTIONS: Home-delivered PATH vs home-delivered ST-CI. Problem adaptation therapy integrates a problem-solving approach with compensatory strategies, environmental adaptations, and caregiver participation to improve patients' emotion regulation. Supportive therapy for cognitively impaired patients focuses on expression of affect, understanding, and empathy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Mixed-effects models for longitudinal data compared the efficacy of PATH with that of ST-CI in reducing depression (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) and disability (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II) during 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Participants in PATH had significantly greater reduction in depression (Cohen d, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.13-1.06; treatment × time, F(1,179) = 8.03; P = .005) and disability (Cohen d, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.20-1.14; treatment × time, F(1,169) = 14.86; P = .001) than ST-CI participants during the 12-week period (primary outcomes). Furthermore, PATH participants had significantly greater depression remission rates than ST-CI participants (37.84% vs 13.51%; χ(2) = 5.74; P = .02; number needed to treat = 4.11) (secondary outcome). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Problem adaptation therapy was more efficacious than ST-CI in reducing depression and disability. Problem adaptation therapy may provide relief to a large group of depressed and cognitively impaired older adults who have few treatment options. TRIALS REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00368940.
RCT Entities:
IMPORTANCE: Problem adaptation therapy (PATH) is a treatment for older adults with major depression, cognitive impairment (from mild cognitive deficits to moderate dementia), and disability. Antidepressants have limited efficacy in this population and psychosocial interventions are inadequately investigated. OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of 12-week PATH vs supportive therapy for cognitively impairedpatients (ST-CI) in reducing depression and disability in 74 older adults with major depression, cognitive impairment, and disability. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized clinical trial at the Weill Cornell Institute of Geriatric Psychiatry from April 1, 2006, to September 31, 2011. Interventions were administered at the participants' homes. Participants included 74 older individuals (age ≥ 65 years) with major depression and cognitive impairment to the level of moderate dementia. They were recruited through collaborating community agencies of Weill Cornell Institute of Geriatric Psychiatry and were randomly assigned to 12 weekly sessions of PATH or ST-CI (14.8% attrition rate). INTERVENTIONS: Home-delivered PATH vs home-delivered ST-CI. Problem adaptation therapy integrates a problem-solving approach with compensatory strategies, environmental adaptations, and caregiver participation to improve patients' emotion regulation. Supportive therapy for cognitively impairedpatients focuses on expression of affect, understanding, and empathy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Mixed-effects models for longitudinal data compared the efficacy of PATH with that of ST-CI in reducing depression (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) and disability (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II) during 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS:Participants in PATH had significantly greater reduction in depression (Cohen d, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.13-1.06; treatment × time, F(1,179) = 8.03; P = .005) and disability (Cohen d, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.20-1.14; treatment × time, F(1,169) = 14.86; P = .001) than ST-CI participants during the 12-week period (primary outcomes). Furthermore, PATH participants had significantly greater depression remission rates than ST-CI participants (37.84% vs 13.51%; χ(2) = 5.74; P = .02; number needed to treat = 4.11) (secondary outcome). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Problem adaptation therapy was more efficacious than ST-CI in reducing depression and disability. Problem adaptation therapy may provide relief to a large group of depressed and cognitively impaired older adults who have few treatment options. TRIALS REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00368940.
Authors: James D Tew; Benoit H Mulsant; Patricia R Houck; Eric J Lenze; Ellen M Whyte; Mark D Miller; Jacqueline A Stack; Salem Bensasi; Charles F Reynolds Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Helen C Kales; Peijun Chen; Frederic C Blow; Deborah E Welsh; Alan M Mellow Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Zvi D Gellis; Jean McGinty; Amy Horowitz; Martha L Bruce; Elizabeth Misener Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2007-09-10 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Ann Kolanowski; Marie Boltz; Elizabeth Galik; Laura N Gitlin; Helen C Kales; Barbara Resnick; Kimberly S Van Haitsma; Amy Knehans; Jane E Sutterlin; Justine S Sefcik; Wen Liu; Darina V Petrovsky; Lauren Massimo; Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi; Margaret MacAndrew; Glenna Brewster; Vycki Nalls; Ying-Ling Jao; Naomi Duffort; Danny Scerpella Journal: Nurs Outlook Date: 2017-06-16 Impact factor: 3.250
Authors: Dora Kanellopoulos; Paul Rosenberg; Lisa D Ravdin; Dalynah Maldonado; Nimra Jamil; Crystal Quinn; Dimitris N Kiosses Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2020-01-08 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: Dimitris N Kiosses; George S Alexopoulos; Greg Hajcak; William Apfeldorf; Paul R Duberstein; David Putrino; James J Gross Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2017-12-27 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Ariel G Gildengers; Meryl A Butters; Steven M Albert; Stewart J Anderson; Mary Amanda Dew; Kirk Erickson; Linda Garand; Jordan F Karp; Michael H Lockovich; Jennifer Morse; Charles F Reynolds Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Dimitris N Kiosses; Paul B Rosenberg; Amanda McGovern; Pasquale Fonzetti; Hana Zaydens; George S Alexopoulos Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2015 Impact factor: 4.472