| Literature DB >> 25372406 |
Gia Khuong Hoang Hua1, Lien Bertier1, Saman Soltaninejad1, Monica Höfte1.
Abstract
Ninety seven Rhizoctonia isolates were collected from different Brassica species with typical Rhizoctonia symptoms in different provinces of Vietnam. The isolates were identified using staining of nuclei and sequencing of the rDNA-ITS barcoding gene. The majority of the isolates were multinucleate R. solani and four isolates were binucleate Rhizoctonia belonging to anastomosis groups (AGs) AG-A and a new subgroup of A-F that we introduce here as AG-Fc on the basis of differences in rDNA-ITS sequence. The most prevalent multinucleate AG was AG 1-IA (45.4% of isolates), followed by AG 1-ID (17.5%), AG 1-IB (13.4%), AG 4-HGI (12.4%), AG 2-2 (5.2%), AG 7 (1.0%) and an unknown AG related to AG 1-IA and AG 1-IE that we introduce here as AG 1-IG (1.0%) on the basis of differences in rDNA-ITS sequence. AG 1-IA and AG 1-ID have not been reported before on Brassica spp. Pathogenicity tests revealed that isolates from all AGs, except AG-A, induced symptoms on detached leaves of several cabbage species. In in vitro tests on white cabbage and Chinese cabbage, both hosts were severely infected by AG 1-IB, AG 2-2, AG 4-HGI, AG 1-IG and AG-Fc isolates, while under greenhouse conditions, only AG 4-HGI, AG 2-2 and AG-Fc isolates could cause severe disease symptoms. The occurrence of the different AGs seems to be correlated with the cropping systems and cultural practices in different sampling areas suggesting that agricultural practices determine the AGs associated with Brassica plants in Vietnam.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25372406 PMCID: PMC4221111 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111750
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Location of sites for collection of Rhizoctonia isolates from Brassica spp. in Vietnam.
The seven provinces sampled are: Ha Noi (districts of Gia Lam, Thanh Tri and Dong Anh), Lam Dong (Da Lat city and Duc Trong district), Dong Nai (Bien Hoa city), Vinh Long (Binh Tan district), Can Tho (Cai Rang district), Hau Giang (Phung Hiep district) and Soc Trang (Soc Trang city and My Xuyen district). In each city or district of one province, one to two wards were surveyed and these wards are marked with a start. Different colors are used to highlight the most important AGs found in our survey including AG 1-IA, AG 1-IB, AG 1-ID and AG 4-HGI.
Sampling locations and their relevant characteristics [53]–[59].
| Sampling location | Agricultural area (1000 ha) | Average temperature (°C) | Main crop |
|
| |||
| Ha Noi | 152.24 | 24 | - Cabbage, tomato, cucumber, radish |
| - Rice | |||
|
| |||
| Lam Dong | 279.00 | High land: 14 | - Lettuce, cabbage, carrot, potato |
| Low land: 21 | - Coffee, tea, cashew-nut tree, cotton | ||
|
| |||
| Dong Nai | 289.02 | 27 | - Coffee, cotton, black pepper |
| - Durian, grapefruit, mango | |||
|
| |||
| Vinh Long | 116.18 | 27 | - Rice |
| - Mango, orange, grapefruit, durian | |||
| - Cabbage, cucumber, bean | |||
| Can Tho | 115.00 | 27 | - Rice |
| - Cabbage, cucumber | |||
| Hau Giang | 139.07 | 27 | - Durian, pineapple, grapefruit |
| - Rice | |||
| Soc Trang | 278.15 | 27 | - Rice |
| - Grapefruit, mango, durian |
Characterization of Rhizoctonia isolates collected from diseased Brassica crops grown in Vietnam by sequencing the ITS-region.
| AG/Subgroup | Host plant | Isolateab | Genbank accession numbers |
| 1-IA |
| STST03-1, STST03-3, STST03-4, STST04-2, | KF907702, KF907703, KF907704, KF907705 |
|
| DNBH01-1, DNBH01-2, DNBH01-3, DNBH02-2, DNBH02-3 | ||
| HNGL01-1, HNGL01-2, | KF907706 | ||
| STST02-1, STST02-2 | |||
| VLBT01-1, VLBT01-2, VLBT01-3, VLBT01-4 | |||
|
|
| KF907707, KF907708, KF907709, KF907710, KF907711 | |
|
| HNDD01-1, HNDD01-2, | KF907712 | |
|
| CTCR01-1, CTCR01-2, | KF907713, KF907714, KF907715 | |
| 1-IB |
| LDDT03-1 | |
|
| LDDL01-1, | KF907716 | |
|
|
| KF907717, KF907718, KF907719 | |
| 1-ID |
|
| KF907720, KF907721, KF907722, KF907723, KF907724 |
| STST04-1, STST04-3 | |||
|
| HGPH01-1, HGPH01-2, | KF907725 | |
| STST02-3 | |||
| 1-IG |
|
| KF907730 |
| 2-2 |
|
| KF907726 |
|
|
| KF907727, KF907728, KF907729 | |
| 4-HGI |
| LDDT01-1, LDDT01-2, LDDL02-2 | KF907731 |
|
| DNBH05-2-1, DNBH05-3-2 | ||
| STST01-1, | KF907732 | ||
|
| DNBH02-1 | ||
|
|
| KF907733 | |
|
| LDDT02-1, LDDT02-2, LDDT02-3 | ||
| 7 |
|
| KF907734 |
| A |
| STMX01-3 | |
|
|
| KF907735 | |
| Fc |
|
| KF907736 |
The first two letters represent provinces in which the samples were collected (i.e. CT: Can Tho, VL: Vinh Long, HG: Hau Giang, ST: Soc Trang, DN: Dong Nai, LD: Lam Dong and HN: Ha Noi).
Isolates in bold (unique sequences) are submitted to Genbank.
Multinucleate and binucleate Rhizoctonia isolates derived from Genbank included in the phylogenetic analysis for comparison.
| AG/Subgroup | Isolate | Host plant | Origin | Genbank accession number | Reference |
| 1-IA | L31-1, L66-1, L73, L59, L38, L52, L62-1 | Rice | Vietnam | EF206342, EF429208, EF429211, EF429212, EF429210, EF429209, EF429207 | unpublished |
| RM61 | Water spinach | Vietnam | EF429216 | unpublished | |
| LB71 | Water hyacinth | Vietnam | EF429215 | unpublished | |
| DP38 | Peanut | Vietnam | EF429214 | unpublished | |
| CLV72-2 | Barnyard grass | Vietnam | EF429213 | unpublished | |
| BV71-2, BV61-2, BV50-1 | Cotton | Vietnam | EF429206, EF429205, EF206341 | unpublished | |
| CC72 | Bermuda grass | Vietnam | EF429204 | unpublished | |
| B34-1 | Corn | Vietnam | EF429203 | unpublished | |
| 1-IG | RMPG28 | Chickpea | India | JF701750 |
|
| 1-ID | BV62-1, BV61-6, BV61-5, BV61-4, BV61-1 | Cotton | Vietnam | EF197803, EF197804, EF197802, EF197801, EF197800 | unpublished |
| SR61, SR650 | Durian | Vietnam | EF197798, EF197797 |
| |
| B61-1 | Corn | Vietnam | EF197796 | unpublished | |
| CCD61-1 | Sugar beet | Vietnam | EF197799 | unpublished | |
| 4-HGI | XL4 | Cauliflower | Vietnam | EF203247 | unpublished |
| CB63, CB34-2 | Cabbage | Vietnam | EF203251, EF203245 | unpublished | |
| CP50-2 | Coffee | Vietnam | EF203250 | unpublished | |
| BV68-1, BV68-2 | Cotton | Vietnam | EF203249, EF203248 | unpublished | |
| KT63-1 | Potato | Vietnam | EF203246 | unpublished | |
| Fc | BS-YT-06-5-14, YT, BS-J-06-6-3, DL-jiang-06-2-4, DL-YT-06-4-10, DL-YT-06-4-9, DL-YT-06-3-4 | Taro, Ginger | China | HM623619, HM623631, HM623615, HM623622, HM623625, HM623624, HM623623 | unpublished |
Figure 2Aggressiveness of Rhizoctonia isolates towards detached leaves of white cabbage, Chinese cabbage, pak choi, mustard cabbage, Chinese flower cabbage, rice and water spinach.
Leaves were scored using a scale ranging from 0 (no disease symptoms) to 4 (lesions covered more than 75% of leaf surface or dead leaf). For rapid visual evaluation of the data, a coloring scale with green (0
Figure 3Pathogenic potential of Rhizoctonia isolates on seedlings of white cabbage and Chinese cabbage in in vitro bio-assays.
Disease severity was assessed on a scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (lesions covering more than 75% of root, hypocotyl or leaf surface or dead plant). For rapid visual evaluation of the data, a coloring scale with green (0
Figure 4Pathogenic potential of Rhizoctonia isolates on roots and hypocotyls of white cabbage and Chinese cabbage in in vivo experiment.
Disease severity on roots was assessed on a scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (seedling dead). For rapid visual evaluation of the data, a coloring scale with green (0
Pairwise sequence similarities of unknown isolates LDDL02-1 and DNBH05-1-2 to all known AGs from the curated database in Table S2 in File S2.
| LDDL02-1 | DNBH05-1-2 | |
|
| 0.88 | 0.92 |
|
| 0.84–0.87 | 0.84–0.87 |
|
| 0.89–0.90 | 0.89–0.90 |
|
| 0.85–0.86 | 0.85 |
|
| 0.89 | 0.94 |
|
| 0.84 | 0.85 |
|
| 0.87–0.90 | 0.82–0.85 |
|
| 0.86–0.87 | 0.84–0.85 |
|
| 0.89–0.90 | 0.85 |
|
| 0.89–0.90 | 0.84–0.85 |
|
| 0.86–0.88 | 0.85–0.88 |
|
| 0.91 | 0.86–0.87 |
|
| 0.89–0.94 | 0.88–0.90 |
|
| 0.91 | 0.89 |
|
| 0.92–0.93 | 0.89–0.90 |
|
| 0.9 | 0.86 |
|
| 0.89–0.90 | 0.84–0.85 |
|
| 0.88–0.89 | 0.84 |
|
| 0.89–0.90 | 0.87–0.88 |
|
| 0.90 | 0.90 |
|
| 0.85–0.86 | 0.81–0.82 |
|
| 0.84 | 0.84 |
|
| 0.84 | 0.84 |
|
| 0.79–0.80 | 0.78–0.79 |
|
| 0.80 | 0.79 |
|
| 0.83 | 0.83 |
|
| 0.83–0.84 | 0.83–0.84 |
|
| 0.80–0.82 | 0.82 |
|
| 0.81–0.82 | 0.81 |
|
| 0.81 | 0.80–0.81 |
|
| 0.78–0.81 | 0.77–0.79 |
|
| 0.85 | 0.85 |
|
| 0.85 | 0.85–0.86 |
|
| 0.86 | 0.86 |
|
| 0.93 | 0.89 |
|
| 0.86–0.89 | 0.86–0.90 |
|
| 0.88 | 0.85 |
|
| 0.88 | 0.88 |
|
| 0.91 | 0.91 |
|
| 0.90–0.91 | 0.89 |
|
| 0.82–0.83 | 0.84 |
|
| 0.80 | 0.82 |
|
| 0.67 | 0.66 |
|
| 0.66–0.67 | 0.64–0.66 |
LDDL02-1 shows most similarity to AG 6 and AG-Fb. DNBH05-1-2 shows highest pairwise sequence similarity to AG 1-IA and AG 1-IE.
Figure 5rDNA-ITS phylogeny of binucleate Rhizoctonia spp. sampled from Brassica spp. in Vietnam.
Neighbour joining tree derived from the alignment of 31 binucleate Rhizoctonia isolates and the outgroup Athelia rolfsii (AY684917). Isolates in bold are the 4 isolates derived from Brassica spp. in Vietnam during this study. For each known binucleate Rhizoctonia AG, a representative isolate (in italics) from the curated database (Table S2 in File S2) is included. Bootstraps are only given for those branches with bootstrap support higher than 70. The tree was made using only isolates with unique sequences. Isolates with identical sequences were added afterwards on the same line.
Figure 6rDNA-ITS phylogeny of multinucleate Rhizoctonia spp. sampled from Brassica spp. in Vietnam.
Neighbour joining tree derived from the alignment of 128 multinucleate Rhizoctonia isolates and the outgroup Athelia rolfsii (AY684917). Isolates in bold are the isolates derived from Brassica spp. in Vietnam during this study. For each of the multinucleate Rhizoctonia AG subgroups present in our sampling, representative isolates (in italics) from the curated database (Table S2 in File S2) are included. Bootstraps are only given for those branches with bootstrap support higher than 70. The tree was made using only isolates with unique sequences. Isolates with identical sequences were added afterwards on the same line. Only half of the length of the outgroup branch is shown to increase clarity.
Contingency table with observed and expected frequencies of anastomosis groups (AGs) of Rhizoctonia spp. obtained from Brassica fields in different provinces of Vietnam.
| Province | AG/Subset | Total/province | ||||||||
| Multinucleate | Binucleate | |||||||||
| 1-IA | 1-IB | 1-ID | 2-2 | 1-IG | 4-HGI | 7 | A | Fc | ||
|
| 6 (5.90) | 0 (1.74) | 0 (2.28) | 5 (0.67) | 0 (0.13) | 1 (1.61) | 1 (0.13) | 0 (0.40) | 0 (0.13) | 13 |
|
| 0 (9.98)* | 13 (2.95)* | 0 (3.86) | 0 (1.13) | 0 (0.45) | 6 (2.72)* | 0 (0.23) | 2 (0.68) | 1 (0.23) | 22 |
|
| 5 (8.62) | 0 (2.55) | 10 (3.33)* | 0 (0.98) | 1 (0.20) | 3 (2.35) | 0 (0.20) | 0 (0.59) | 0 (0.20) | 19 |
|
| 4 (1.81) | 0 (0.54) | 0 (0.70) | 0 (0.21) | 0 (0.04) | 0 (0.49) | 0 (0.04) | 0 (0.12) | 0 (0.04) | 4 |
|
| 8 (3.63) | 0 (1.07) | 0 (1.40) | 0 (0.41) | 0 (0.08) | 0 (0.99) | 0 (0.08) | 0 (0.25) | 0 (0.08) | 8 |
|
| 0 (1.81) | 0 (0.54) | 4 (0.70)* | 0 (0.21) | 0 (0.04) | 0 (0.49) | 0 (0.04) | 0 (0.12) | 0 (0.04) | 4 |
|
| 21 (12.25)* | 0 (3.62) | 3 (4.73) | 0 (1.39) | 0 (0.28) | 2 (3.34) | 0 (0.28) | 1 (0.84) | 0 (0.28) | 27 |
|
| 44 | 13 | 17 | 5 | 1 | 12 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 97 |
Data show actual numbers of isolates collected among the different provinces. According to Fisher's exact test (p = 0.05), the AGs found are related to the sampling locations. An asterisk* indicates significant differences between observed and expected numbers. Values in parentheses represent the expected numbers.
Contingency table with observed and expected frequencies of anastomosis groups (AGs) of Rhizoctonia spp. obtained from field-grown Brassica crops in Vietnam.
| Host plant | AG/Subseta | Total/host plant | ||||||||
| Multinucleate | Binucleate | |||||||||
| 1-IA | 1-IB | 1-ID | 2-2 | 1-IG | 4-HGI | 7 | A | Fc | ||
|
| 14 (9.07) | 0 (2.68) | 5 (3.51) | 0 (1.03) | 0 (0.21) | 1 (2.47) | 0 (0.21) | 1 (0.62) | 0 (0.21) | 20 |
|
| 8 (9.53) | 8 (2.81)* | 0 (3.68) | 0 (1.08) | 0 (0.22) | 3 (2.60) | 0 (0.22) | 2 (0.65) | 0 (0.22) | 21 |
|
| 9 (12.25) | 0 (3.62) | 12 (4.73)* | 1 (1.39) | 1 (0.28) | 4 (3.34) | 0 (0.28) | 0 (0.84) | 0 (0.28) | 27 |
|
| 0 (2.27) | 1 (0.67) | 0 (0.88) | 0 (0.26) | 0 (0.05) | 3 (0.62) | 0 (0.05) | 0 (0.15) | 1 (0.05) | 5 |
|
| 10 (4.99) | 0 (1.47) | 0 (1.93) | 0 (0.57) | 0 (0.11) | 0 (1.36) | 0 (0.11) | 1 (0.34) | 0 (0.11) | 11 |
|
| 0 (1.81) | 4 (0.54)* | 0 (0.70) | 0 (0.21) | 0 (0.04) | 0 (0.49) | 0 (0.04) | 0 (0.12) | 0 (0.04) | 4 |
|
| 3 (4.08) | 0 (1.21) | 0 (1.58) | 4 (0.46)* | 0 (0.09) | 1 (1.11) | 1 (0.09) | 0 (0.28) | 0 (0.09) | 9 |
|
| 44 | 13 | 17 | 5 | 1 | 12 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 97 |
Data show actual numbers of isolates collected among the different Brassica crops. According to Fisher's exact test (p = 0.05), the AGs found are related to the crops. An asterisk* indicates significant differences between observed and expected numbers. Values in parentheses represent the expected numbers.
Figure 7Rhizoctonia-infected water hyacinth is introduced as cover material to a white cabbage field in Vietnam.
Rhizoctonia-infected water hyacinth is taken from a nearby water ditch and used as cover material on the white cabbage field. Via this common practice, Vietnamese farmers unintentionally introduce the Rhizoctonia fungus to their crops.