| Literature DB >> 25371835 |
Yumi Yamamoto1, Akihito Kawashima2, Eri Kashiwagi3, Kiyoyuki Ogata3.
Abstract
Therapy for acute leukemia in Jehovah's Witnesses patients is very challenging because of their refusal to accept blood transfusions, a fundamental supportive therapy for this disease. These patients are often denied treatment for fear of treatment-related death. We present the first Jehovah's Witness patient with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated successfully with azacitidine. After achieving complete remission (CR) with one course of azacitidine therapy, the patient received conventional postremission chemotherapy and remained in CR. In the case of patients who accept blood transfusions, there are reports indicating the treatment of AML patients with azacitidine. In these reports, azacitidine therapy was less toxic, including hematoxicity, compared with conventional chemotherapy. The CR rate in azacitidine-treated patients was inadequate; however, some characteristics could be useful in predicting azacitidine responders. The present case is useful for treating Jehovah's Witnesses patients with AML and provides a clue for anti-AML therapy requiring minimum blood transfusions.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25371835 PMCID: PMC4202254 DOI: 10.1155/2014/141260
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Case Rep Hematol ISSN: 2090-6579
Figure 1Clinical course of the patient during induction therapy with azacitidine. ESA: erythropoiesis-stimulating agent; G-CSF: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.
Azacitidine therapy for AML in the literature.
| Number of CR/number of all cases (CR rate) | Predictor for responsea | Time to responsea | Transfusions given during induction therapy period | Reference number | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Newly diagnosed AML | Relapsed or refractory AML | ||||
| 4/20 (20%) | — | Normal cytogenetics | Median 3 months (range 2–5 months) | No data | [ |
| 8/78 (10%) | No data | No data | No data | [ | |
| 10/55 (18%)b | — | No data | No data | No data | [ |
| 2/20 (10%)c | 0/20 (0%) | Lower BM blast percentages before therapy and day 15 of the therapy | Median 2.5 months (range 1–7 months) | No data | [ |
| 32/114 (28%)d | — | No data | No data | No data | [ |
| 8/35 (23%) | 4/47 (8%) | Leukocyte count < 10 × 109/L, newly diagnosed AML | No data | No data | [ |
| 9/26 (35%) | — | No data | Median 4 months (range 3–7 months) | RBC 2.7 times/month and platelets 0.3 times/month during the first 3 monthse | [ |
| 15/155 (10%) | No data | Median 4 months | No data | [ | |
| 13/55 (24%) | — | No data | Median 4 months (range 1–10 months) | No data | [ |
| 6/34 (18%)f | 0/28 (0%)f | Newly diagnosed AML | Median 3.5 cycles of therapy | No data | [ |
aResponse includes CR, partial remission, and hematological improvement defined in the previous report [6].
bPatients were AML with low bone marrow blast counts (blasts 20%–34%).
cEight de novo AML and 12 AML transformed from MDS.
dPatients were treated with either azacitidine or decitabine and with or without histone deacetylase inhibitor.
eTransfusion requirement during the first course of induction chemotherapy was significantly less in patients treated with azacitidine compared with patients treated with conventional anti-AML chemotherapy (RBC transfusions: median 2.7 versus 7 times per month; platelet transfusions: median 0.3 versus 5 times per month).
fPatients were treated with either azacitidine or decitabine.