Literature DB >> 25371458

Early morbidity after aseptic revision hip arthroplasty in Denmark: a two-year nationwide study.

M Lindberg-Larsen1, C C Jørgensen1, T B Hansen2, S Solgaard3, H Kehlet1.   

Abstract

Data on early morbidity and complications after revision total hip replacement (THR) are limited. The aim of this nationwide study was to describe and quantify early morbidity after aseptic revision THR and relate the morbidity to the extent of the revision surgical procedure. We analysed all aseptic revision THRs from 1st October 2009 to 30th September 2011 using the Danish National Patient Registry, with additional information from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry. There were 1553 procedures (1490 patients) performed in 40 centres and we divided them into total revisions, acetabular component revisions, femoral stem revisions and partial revisions. The mean age of the patients was 70.4 years (25 to 98) and the median hospital stay was five days (interquartile range 3 to 7). Within 90 days of surgery, the readmission rate was 18.3%, mortality rate 1.4%, re-operation rate 6.1%, dislocation rate 7.0% and infection rate 3.0%. There were no differences in these outcomes between high- and low-volume centres. Of all readmissions, 255 (63.9%) were due to 'surgical' complications versus 144 (36.1%) 'medical' complications. Importantly, we found no differences in early morbidity across the surgical subgroups, despite major differences in the extent and complexity of operations. However, dislocations and the resulting morbidity represent the major challenge for improvement in aseptic revision THR. ©2014 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fast-track; Length of stay; Morbidity; Mortality; Nationwide; Readmission; Reoperation; Revision; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25371458     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.33949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  6 in total

1.  Enhanced recovery principles applied to revision hip and knee arthroplasty reduces length of stay and blood transfusion.

Authors:  Michael Kent; Nick Calvert; Kevin Blades; Alex Swann; Piers Yates
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-08-12

2.  Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed for Coxarthrosis Preserves Long-Term Physical Function: A 40-Year Experience.

Authors:  Philip D Wilson; Leslee Wong; Yuo-Yu Lee; Stephen Lyman; Charles N Cornell
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-04-22

3.  Re-revision total hip arthroplasty: Epidemiology and factors associated with outcomes.

Authors:  S Yu; H Saleh; N Bolz; J Buza; R Iorio; P A Rathod; R Schwarzkopf; A J Deshmukh
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-08-28

4.  Peri-prosthetic tissue cells show osteogenic capacity to differentiate into the osteoblastic lineage.

Authors:  Monique A E Schoeman; Angela E Oostlander; Karien Ede Rooij; Edward R Valstar; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Fast-track revision hip arthroplasty: a multicenter cohort study on 1,345 elective aseptic major component revision hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  Martin Lindberg-Larsen; Pelle Baggesgaard Petersen; Yasemin Corap; Kirill Gromov; Christoffer Calov Jørgensen; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Patient safety in distal femoral resection knee arthroplasty for non-tumor indications: a single-center consecutive cohort study of 45 patients.

Authors:  Yasemin Corap; Michael Brix; Claus Emmeluth; Martin Lindberg-Larsen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.