Literature DB >> 25371037

Effects of ultraprotective ventilation, extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal, and spontaneous breathing on lung morphofunction and inflammation in experimental severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Andreas Güldner1, Thomas Kiss, Thomas Bluth, Christopher Uhlig, Anja Braune, Nadja Carvalho, Theresa Quast, Ines Rentzsch, Robert Huhle, Peter Spieth, Torsten Richter, Felipe Saddy, Patricia R M Rocco, Michael Kasper, Thea Koch, Paolo Pelosi, Marcelo Gama de Abreu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To investigate the role of ultraprotective mechanical ventilation (UP-MV) and extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal with and without spontaneous breathing (SB) to improve respiratory function and lung protection in experimental severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.
METHODS: Severe acute respiratory distress syndrome was induced by saline lung lavage and mechanical ventilation (MV) with higher tidal volume (VT) in 28 anesthetized pigs (32.8 to 52.5 kg). Animals (n = 7 per group) were randomly assigned to 6 h of MV (airway pressure release ventilation) with: (1) conventional P-MV with VT ≈6 ml/kg (P-MVcontr); (2) UP-MV with VT ≈3 ml/kg (UP-MVcontr); (3) UP-MV with VT ≈3 ml/kg and SB (UP-MVspont); and (4) UP-MV with VT ≈3 ml/kg and pressure supported SB (UP-MVPS). In UP-MV groups, extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal was used.
RESULTS: The authors found that: (1) UP-MVcontr reduced diffuse alveolar damage score in dorsal lung zones (median[interquartile]) (12.0 [7.0 to 16.8] vs. 22.5 [13.8 to 40.8]), but worsened oxygenation and intrapulmonary shunt, compared to P-MVcontr; (2) UP-MVspont and UP-MVPS improved oxygenation and intrapulmonary shunt, and redistributed ventilation towards dorsal areas, as compared to UP-MVcontr; (3) compared to P-MVcontr, UP-MVcontr and UP-MVspont, UP-MVPS yielded higher levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (6.9 [6.5 to 10.1] vs. 2.8 [2.2 to 3.0], 3.6 [3.0 to 4.7] and 4.0 [2.8 to 4.4] pg/mg, respectively) and interleukin-8 (216.8 [113.5 to 343.5] vs. 59.8 [45.3 to 66.7], 37.6 [18.8 to 52.0], and 59.5 [36.1 to 79.7] pg/mg, respectively) in dorsal lung zones.
CONCLUSIONS: In this model of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, MV with VT ≈3 ml/kg and extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal without SB slightly reduced lung histologic damage, but not inflammation, as compared to MV with VT = 4 to 6 ml/kg. During UP-MV, pressure supported SB increased lung inflammation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25371037     DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  7 in total

Review 1.  Recruitment maneuvers in acute respiratory distress syndrome: The safe way is the best way.

Authors:  Raquel S Santos; Pedro L Silva; Paolo Pelosi; Patricia Rm Rocco
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-11-04

2.  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Possible Late Indication for Coronavirus Disease 2019?

Authors:  Thibaud Soumagne; Franck Grillet; Gaël Piton; Hadrien Winiszewski; Gilles Capellier
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2020-10-06

3.  Reduced pulmonary blood flow in regions of injury 2 hours after acid aspiration in rats.

Authors:  Torsten Richter; Ralf Bergmann; Guido Musch; Jens Pietzsch; Thea Koch
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 4.  Mechanical Ventilation during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients with Acute Severe Respiratory Failure.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang; Wan-Jie Gu; Kun Chen; Hongying Ni
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 2.409

5.  Effects of Lung Protective Ventilation on the Cognitive Function Level of Patients with Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Shuming Wei; Shengde Li; He Dong; Wenming Xiao; Mingsheng Li; Haichen Chu
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.429

6.  Ultraprotective versus apneic ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a physiological study.

Authors:  Peter T Graf; Christoph Boesing; Isabel Brumm; Jonas Biehler; Kei Wieland Müller; Manfred Thiel; Paolo Pelosi; Patricia R M Rocco; Thomas Luecke; Joerg Krebs
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2022-03-07

Review 7.  Toward a Long-Term Artificial Lung.

Authors:  Jutta Arens; Oliver Grottke; Axel Haverich; Lars S Maier; Thomas Schmitz-Rode; Ulrich Steinseifer; H P Wendel; Rolf Rossaint
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.826

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.