Literature DB >> 25370964

Diagnostic performance of quantitative fluorescence PCR analysis in high-risk pregnancies after combined first-trimester screening.

Dorte Launholt Lildballe1, Ida Vogel, Olav Bjørn Petersen, Else Marie Vestergaard.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to determine the diagnostic efficiency of quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) in a clinical setting where most of the analyses are performed on chorion villus samples from high-risk pregnancies as determined by combined first-trimester screening.
METHODS: A retrospective study on QF-PCR data from all pregnancies in the Central and North Denmark Regions over a four-year period (n = 2,550) with invasive prenatal testing carried out due to a high risk of carrying a foetus with Down's syndrome. Results of QF-PCR were compared with those obtained by karyotyping. Other supplementary data were obtained from the Danish Foetal Medicine Database and the Danish Cytogenetic Central Register.
RESULTS: QF-PCR for common aneuploidies is fast, has a low failure rate, and is associated with high positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) (> 99.8%) for all analysed abnormal karyotypes except for mosaicism for trisomy 13 (PPV = 20%) and sex chromosome mosaic cases (PPV = 40%; NPV = 99.7%)). In 25 (1%) cases, clinically significant chromosome abnormalities other than chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y were identified by karyotyping.
CONCLUSION: QF-PCR is a rapid and accurate diagnostic method to detect common aneuploidies in high-risk pregnancies. However, the rapid test cannot stand alone as several clinically significant abnormal karyotypes would be overlooked. FUNDING: not relevant. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25370964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dan Med J        ISSN: 2245-1919            Impact factor:   1.240


  3 in total

1.  Validation of QF-PCR for prenatal diagnoses in a Brazilian population.

Authors:  Renata Wendel de Moraes; Mario Henrique Burlacchini de Carvalho; Antonio Gomes de Amorim-Filho; Rossana Pulcineli Vieira Francisco; Renata Moscolini Romão; José Eduardo Levi; Marcelo Zugaib
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.365

2.  Factors influencing harmonized health data collection, sharing and linkage in Denmark and Switzerland: A systematic review.

Authors:  Lester Darryl Geneviève; Andrea Martani; Maria Christina Mallet; Tenzin Wangmo; Bernice Simone Elger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  PCR vs karyotype for CVS and amniocentesis-the experience at one tertiary fetal medicine unit.

Authors:  Catherine Finnegan; Suzanne Smyth; Orla Smith; Karen Flood; Jane Dalrymple; Fionnuala M Breathnach; Fergal D Malone
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 2.089

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.