OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of a series of projects that used a structured self-report screening tool in diverse settings and samples to screen for lifetime history of traumatic brain injury (TBI). SETTING: Diverse community settings. PARTICIPANTS: Homeless persons (n = 111), individuals with HIV seeking vocational rehabilitation (n = 173), youth in the juvenile justice system (n = 271), public schoolchildren (n = 174), substance users (n = 845), intercollegiate athletes (n = 90), and other community-based samples (n = 396). DESIGN: Cross-sectional. MAIN MEASURE: Brain Injury Screening Questionnaire. RESULTS: Screening using the Brain Injury Screening Questionnaire finds that 27% to 54% of those in high-risk populations report a history of TBI with chronic symptoms. Associations between TBI and social, academic, or other problems are evident in several studies. In non-high-risk community samples, 9% to 12% of individuals report TBI with chronic symptoms. CONCLUSION: Systematic TBI screening can be implemented efficiently and inexpensively in a variety of settings. Lifetime TBI history data gathered using a structured self-report instrument can augment existing estimates of the prevalence of TBI, both as an acute event and as a chronic condition. Identification of individuals with TBI can facilitate primary prevention efforts, such as reducing risk for reinjury in high-risk groups, and provide access to appropriate interventions that can reduce the personal and societal costs of TBI (tertiary prevention).
OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of a series of projects that used a structured self-report screening tool in diverse settings and samples to screen for lifetime history of traumatic brain injury (TBI). SETTING: Diverse community settings. PARTICIPANTS: Homeless persons (n = 111), individuals with HIV seeking vocational rehabilitation (n = 173), youth in the juvenile justice system (n = 271), public schoolchildren (n = 174), substance users (n = 845), intercollegiate athletes (n = 90), and other community-based samples (n = 396). DESIGN: Cross-sectional. MAIN MEASURE: Brain Injury Screening Questionnaire. RESULTS: Screening using the Brain Injury Screening Questionnaire finds that 27% to 54% of those in high-risk populations report a history of TBI with chronic symptoms. Associations between TBI and social, academic, or other problems are evident in several studies. In non-high-risk community samples, 9% to 12% of individuals report TBI with chronic symptoms. CONCLUSION: Systematic TBI screening can be implemented efficiently and inexpensively in a variety of settings. Lifetime TBI history data gathered using a structured self-report instrument can augment existing estimates of the prevalence of TBI, both as an acute event and as a chronic condition. Identification of individuals with TBI can facilitate primary prevention efforts, such as reducing risk for reinjury in high-risk groups, and provide access to appropriate interventions that can reduce the personal and societal costs of TBI (tertiary prevention).
Authors: Jennie Ponsford; Anna McLaren; Michael Schönberger; Richard Burke; Dion Rudzki; John Olver; Michael Ponsford Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2011-08-08 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Lisa A Brenner; Beeta Y Homaifar; Jennifer H Olson-Madden; Herbert T Nagamoto; Joe Huggins; Alexandra L Schneider; Jeri E Forster; Bridget Matarazzo; John D Corrigan Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2013 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.710
Authors: Sara M Lippa; Ping-Hong Yeh; Jessica Gill; Louis M French; Tracey A Brickell; Rael T Lange Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2019-04-09 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Brian L Edlow; C Dirk Keene; Daniel P Perl; Diego Iacono; Rebecca D Folkerth; William Stewart; Christine L Mac Donald; Jean Augustinack; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia; Camilo Estrada; Elissa Flannery; Wayne A Gordon; Thomas J Grabowski; Kelly Hansen; Jeanne Hoffman; Christopher Kroenke; Eric B Larson; Patricia Lee; Azma Mareyam; Jennifer A McNab; Jeanne McPhee; Allison L Moreau; Anne Renz; KatieRose Richmire; Allison Stevens; Cheuk Y Tang; Lee S Tirrell; Emily H Trittschuh; Andre van der Kouwe; Ani Varjabedian; Lawrence L Wald; Ona Wu; Anastasia Yendiki; Liza Young; Lilla Zöllei; Bruce Fischl; Paul K Crane; Kristen Dams-O'Connor Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2018-05-03 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Christine L Mac Donald; Jason Barber; Mary Jordan; Ann M Johnson; Sureyya Dikmen; Jesse R Fann; Nancy Temkin Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Raquel C Gardner; Ernesto Rivera; Megan O'Grady; Colin Doherty; Kristine Yaffe; John D Corrigan; Jennifer Bogner; Joel Kramer; Fiona Wilson Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2020 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Carrie Esopenko; Jessica Meyer; Elisabeth A Wilde; Amy D Marshall; David F Tate; Alexander P Lin; Inga K Koerte; Kimberly B Werner; Emily L Dennis; Ashley L Ware; Nicola L de Souza; Deleene S Menefee; Kristen Dams-O'Connor; Dan J Stein; Erin D Bigler; Martha E Shenton; Kathy S Chiou; Judy L Postmus; Kathleen Monahan; Brenda Eagan-Johnson; Paul van Donkelaar; Tricia L Merkley; Carmen Velez; Cooper B Hodges; Hannah M Lindsey; Paula Johnson; Andrei Irimia; Matthew Spruiell; Esther R Bennett; Ashley Bridwell; Glynnis Zieman; Frank G Hillary Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 3.978