Literature DB >> 25370420

Double-blind peer review.

.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 25370420     DOI： 10.1038/nnano.2014.273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol        ISSN： 1748-3387            Impact factor:   39.213


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Working double-blind.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial.

Authors:  S van Rooyen; F Godlee; S Evans; N Black; R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-01-02

3.  Double-blind under review.

Authors:  Alastair Brown
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 39.213

4.  Use of double-blind peer review to increase author diversity.

Authors:  E S Darling
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 6.560

5.  Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students.

Authors:  Corinne A Moss-Racusin; John F Dovidio; Victoria L Brescoll; Mark J Graham; Jo Handelsman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.