Christiane Helling1, Peter Woitke2, Paul B Rimmer3, Inga Kamp4, Wing-Fai Thi5, Rowin Meijerink6. 1. SUPA, School of Physics & Astronomy, University of St Andrews, North Haugh,St Andrews KY16 9SS, UK. ch80@st-and.ac.uk. 2. SUPA, School of Physics & Astronomy, University of St Andrews, North Haugh,St Andrews KY16 9SS, UK. pw31@st-and.ac.uk. 3. SUPA, School of Physics & Astronomy, University of St Andrews, North Haugh,St Andrews KY16 9SS, UK. pr33@st-and.ac.uk. 4. Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, Postbus 800, Groningen 9747 AV, The Netherlands. kamp@astro.rug.nl. 5. Laboratoire d'Astrophisique de Grenoble, CNRS/Université Joseph Fourier (UMR5571) BP 53,Grenoble cedex 9 F-38041, France. wing-fai.thi@obs.ujf-grenoble.fr. 6. Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, Postbus 800, Groningen 9747 AV, The Netherlands. meijerink@astro.rug.nl.
Abstract
We discuss the chemical pre-conditions for planet formation, in terms of gas and ice abundances in a protoplanetary disk, as function of time and position, and the resulting chemical composition and cloud properties in the atmosphere when young gas giant planets form, in particular discussing the effects of unusual, non-solar carbon and oxygen abundances. Large deviations between the abundances of the host star and its gas giants seem likely to occur if the planet formation follows the core-accretion scenario. These deviations stem from the separate evolution of gas and dust in the disk, where the dust forms the planet cores, followed by the final run-away accretion of the left-over gas. This gas will contain only traces of elements like C, N and O, because those elements have frozen out as ices. PRODIMO protoplanetary disk models are used to predict the chemical evolution of gas and ice in the midplane. We find that cosmic rays play a crucial role in slowly un-blocking the CO, where the liberated oxygen forms water, which then freezes out quickly. Therefore, the C/O ratio in the gas phase is found to gradually increase with time, in a region bracketed by the water and CO ice-lines. In this regions, C/O is found to approach unity after about 5 Myrs, scaling with the cosmic ray ionization rate assumed. We then explore how the atmospheric chemistry and cloud properties in young gas giants are affected when the non-solar C/O ratios predicted by the disk models are assumed. The DRIFT cloud formation model is applied to study the formation of atmospheric clouds under the influence of varying premordial element abundances and its feedback onto the local gas. We demonstrate that element depletion by cloud formation plays a crucial role in converting an oxygen-rich atmosphere gas into carbon-rich gas when non-solar, premordial element abundances are considered as suggested by disk models.
We discuss thechemical pre-conditions for planet formation, in terms of gas and ice abundances in a protoplanetary disk, as function of time and position, and the resulting chemicalcomposition and cloud properties in the atmosphere when young gas giant planets form, in particular discussing the effects of unusual, non-solarcarbon and oxygen abundances. Large deviations between the abundances of the host star and its gas giants seem likely to occur if the planet formation follows thecore-accretion scenario. These deviations stem from the separate evolution of gas and dust in the disk, where the dust forms the planet cores, followed by the final run-away accretion of the left-over gas. This gas will contain only traces of elements like C, N and O, because those elements have frozen out as ices. PRODIMOprotoplanetary disk models are used to predict thechemical evolution of gas and ice in the midplane. We find that cosmicrays play a crucial role in slowly un-blocking theCO, where the liberated oxygen forms water, which then freezes out quickly. Therefore, theC/O ratio in the gas phase is found to gradually increase with time, in a region bracketed by thewater and CO ice-lines. In this regions, C/O is found to approach unity after about 5 Myrs, scaling with thecosmic ray ionization rate assumed. We then explore how the atmosphericchemistry and cloud properties in young gas giants are affected when the non-solarC/O ratios predicted by the disk models are assumed. The DRIFT cloud formation model is applied to study the formation of atmosphericclouds under the influence of varying premordial element abundances and its feedback onto the local gas. We demonstrate that element depletion by cloud formation plays a crucial role in converting an oxygen-rich atmosphere gas into carbon-rich gas when non-solar, premordial element abundances are considered as suggested by disk models.
Element abundances are critical parameters to predict the atmosphericcomposition of exoplanets and to understand their formation and evolution, including potentially the emergence of life. Extrasolar gas giants are commonly assumed to have elemental abundances similar to those of their host stars. These stars themselves can be reasonably well measured, for example (in case of the Sun) by high-resolution spectroscopy in combination with time-dependent numericalsimulations of the photosphere, meteorite studies, or astroseismology [1]. However, whenconsidering the process of planet formation in a protoplanetary disk, which involves a segregation of gas, dust and ice phases, the assumption that the element mix of the host star must be the same as in the gas giants’ atmospheres becomes questionable. This has far-reaching consequences for the spectroscopic analysis of planetary spectra, including the search for bio-signatures [2,3,4]. Following the standard core-accretion model of planet formation [5,6], the refractory elements are initially present mostly in form of μm-sized dust particles, which undergo a complex evolution eventually leading to km-sized planetesimals. The planetesimals are gravitationally attracted to each other, and collide to form larger parental bodies that later become planetary cores [7,8].At the end of the evolution from dust to planet cores, the planet feeding zone is expected to be mostly devoid of smaller dust particles [9], and the remaining gas in the planet feeding zone is expected to contain only minor traces of refractory elements. Elements which are able to form ices on the surface of the refractory grains in protoplanetary disks, in particularoxygen, carbon and nitrogen, will also be depleted to an extent, depending on local temperature, though less than the refractory elements. The ices play an essential role in the dust growth process as “glue” or “cement” during planet formation [10]. The dust particles have been in contact with the gas in the disk for > 106 years, which is certainly long enough to cause most of the gaseous oxygen in the disk midplane to form H2O ice outside thewater “ice-line” and for most of the gaseous carbon to form CO ice outside theCO “ice-line” [11]. The elements bound in those ices should then rather follow the dust than the gas dynamical evolution. Only at the very end of the planet formation process, the overwhelming majority of the mass of the gas giant will be accreted onto the proto-planet in a rapid run-away phase [12], using up the remaining gas in the planet feeding zone and possibly forming a gap. Thetimescale for gas accretion onto the proto-planet is about two orders of magnitude shorter than the growth timescale of the solid core [13]. At this late stage, the gas should contain only traces of refractory elements, and possibly also very little amounts of the “ice elements” O, C and N, depending on local temperature, i.e., position in the disk. The resulting planetary atmosphere will hence be extremely metal-poor in the first place. Late bombardment with left-over planetesimals [14,15] will cause an element re-enrichment leading once more to a change of the atmosphericcomposition. The opacity of the atmosphere surrounding the planetary core plays an important role for thecritical mass that inhibits further accretion [16].Thus, the formation of gas giants via core-accretion means that, first, the ice and volatile elements segregate. Then the gas and icy dust evolves separately. Finally, the icy dust and the gas combine in a specific order, forming a planet. It would be a strange coincidence if all these complicated processes would result in gas giant surface element abundances that resemble those of their host stars. We should rather expect a large variety of the atmospheric element abundances of gas giants, depending on when and where the planets form.In this paper, we first study the segregation and evolution of gas and ice in protoplanetary disk models to predict the element abundances of the gas that will finally be accreted onto the proto-planets (Section 2). We show that the resulting carbon-to oxygen ratio (C/O) is expected to be larger than the primordial value, and increase further with time, in particular between thewater snowline (≈150 K) and theCO ice-line (≈20 K), where mostly water freezes out. Similar results have been recently obtained in [17], who schematically discussed the relative segregation of carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen in the disk, causing theC/O and C/H ratios to differ significantly from those of the host stars. Gaseous C/O ratios close to unity between thewater and CO ice-lines, mainly driven by the formation of water, CO and CO2 ices [17]. Thetime-dependent ice composition in the midplane of T Tauri disks has been studied by [11,18], who found agreement with measured chemicalcompositions of comets in their model, after long integrationtimes (10 Myrs) at 10 AU, using a relatively high cosmic ray ionization rate of 5 × 10−17 s−1 and a sophisticated treatment of the secondary cosmic ray induced photo reactions, the rates of which are enhanced due to an increased ratio of UV gas absorption with respect to dust absorption, driven by dust growth with respect to interstellarconditions.We expect themetal-poor gas in protoplanetary disks to lead to unusual element abundances in planets, in particular the element abundances in gas giant atmospheres, although the dynamical details of the actual planet formation process need further investigation [16]. Tentative detections of carbon-rich planets have been announced, concerning the planets WASP 12b and 55 Cancri e, respectively [19,20]. However, 65 orbits of WFC3-IR grism observations could not find any evidence for C/O > 1 in the atmosphere of WASP 12b [21], as was reported [19]. And in thecase of 55 Cancri e, is was shown that the abundance analysis of the host star 55 Cancri [22] (used in [20]) was probably erroneous due to a unsuitable choice of a zero-excitationoxygen line [23].Most of the presently known extrasolar planets orbit somewhat metal-rich host stars [24]. However, this simple relation holds only for giant gas planets, but not for Neptune-sized planets. It was argued that the Sun has a depletion of refractory to volatile elements of about 20% with respect to planet-free solar twins [25]. This abundance deficit roughly matches the mass of the terrestrial planets. One possible explanation for these deficiencies is to assume an early formation of ∼10 km bodies, which later formed the terrestrial planets before the majority of the Sun’s mass (excluding the ∼10 km bodies) was accreted from the proto-solar disk. The abundance peculiarities can also be found in solar-like stars that are known to have close-in giant planets [25].Our knowledge about thechemicalcomposition of exoplanet atmospheres is prompted by transit observations of close-in planets, e.g., [26,27,28], or by bulk properties like global density estimates, e.g., [29]. Recent observation of the four directly imaged HD 8788 planets, however, suggest spectral diversity amongst co-eval objects of similar luminosity. The authors report on tentative detections of CH4, C2H2, CO2 and HCN [30]. A more complete understanding of exoplanet atmospheres hinges on the detailed atmosphere modeling that must include cloud formation, photochemistry and globalcirculation. The element abundances are essential parameters to all those models, and a simple scaling of a metallicity parameter, e.g., from [26,31], is far from realistic, as we will demonstrate in Section 3 of this paper. Planetary atmosphere chemistry does not only depend on the initial element abundances but also on thecloud formation process that depletes condensable elements and hence determines the remaining gas composition and radiative cooling processes. Cloud formation will impact all elements involved (Fe, Ti, Al, O, . . . [2,3]) and thereby change theC/O-ratio in such atmospheres (see Figure 2 and Figure 3 in [4]). Cloud layers have a large impact on the atmospheric structure and the spectral appearance of ultra-cool low-mass objects, like brown dwarfs and planets. Thus, a direct abundance analysis of exoplanets like WASP 12b, possibly with future instruments like JWST, must take these effects into account carefully. Different cloud models make different predictions for the remaining gas-phase abundances resulting in different molecular abundances [32]. Clouds are expected to occur in a variety of physical phases and chemicalcompositions, depending on temperature and pressure, from cold icy hazes, over liquid droplets, to hot solid gemstones. Beside temperature and pressure, thecloud formation process is controlled by the elementalcomposition of the atmospheric gas, which in turn is drastically reduced by theconsumption of condensable elements into cloud particles and subsequent rain-out [2].
Figure 2
Same as Figure 1, but for the ProDiMo model based on the OSU-2010 rates.
Figure 3
Destruction of molecular oxygen and formation of water ice, after 1 Myr in the midplane of the UMIST-2012 model at 2.5 AU, where temperature and density are 75 K and 3 × 1013 cm−3, respectively. “#” denotes ice species. The red species indicate the reaction partners, and the blue numbers are the reaction rates in s−1cm−3.
Section 2 summarizes the disk chemistry model that we use to predict gas and ice elemental abundances in proto-planetary disks. Section 3 introduces our model for planetary atmospheres and cloud formation. Inspired by the results of the disk models, we consider unusual element abundances, in particular large ratios C/O ≲ 1 in young gas giant atmospheres. In Section 4, we demonstrate that such non-standard oxygen abundances have a strong impact on the atmospheric structure and cloud properties in the atmosphere, like thecloud base, cloud particle number densities, and mean grain sizes. We further show that condensation of oxygen-rich dust may cause theC/O ratio to tip over locally, C/O>1, and we show that the abundances of astrobiologically interesting molecules like H2O, CH4, NH3, C2H2, C2H6 may increase near thecloud top.
Gas and Ice Abundances in Protoplanetary Disks
In order to model thechemicalcomposition of the gas and ice in the disk as function of time, we follow a two-stage modeling strategy. In disk modeling stage 1, we simulate thechemistry in the dark cores of molecularclouds by advancing our chemical rate network under thecorresponding temperature, density, and radiation field conditions for an assumed lifetime of the dark core. The resulting concentrations are then taken as initialconditions for the disk simulations in disk modeling stage 2. This is a very much simplified approach which ignores thecomplicated hydrodynamical star and disk formation processes itself, as well as thechanging conditions in the disk during class-0 and class-I, although these phases are relatively short. Instead, we reset our clock at the beginning of stage 2, and then advance our chemistry further under the local temperature, density, dust, and radiation field conditions in the disk.More sophisticated models for the early disk phases, which evolve thechemistry along streamlines from hydro-models for star and disk formation, have been carried out by [33]. In this paper, we are interested in the long-term evolution of thechemistry, and hence concentrate on class-II disks. Protoplanetary disksare observed to survive for about 3–10 Myrs before they disperse [34,35]. We evolve the disk chemistry for 10 Myrs, and even beyond, to study the asymptotic behavior towards kineticchemical equilibrium which provides an interesting specialcase, providing additional understanding of thecomplete chemical paths for disk midplane evolution.For our chemicalsimulations, we apply the radiation thermo-chemical disk code ProDiMo [36]. The 2D code consistently solves the dust continuum radiative transfer, with the dust component in radiative equilibrium, the gas heating and cooling balance (70 heating processes, 64 cooling processes), the gas phase and ice chemistry, and the non-LTE line transfer in class-II protoplanetary disks, with recent updates described by [37,38]. Thechemical model consists of 12 elements (H, He, C, N, O, Mg, Si, S, Fe, Ne, Ar, PAH) and 166 species, including vibrationally excited H2, 30 ice species with adsorption energies assumed as listed in Table 1, and 5 charging states of PAHs. Concerning the reaction rates, we have experimented with two networks: the UMIST-2012 rates [39] and theOSU-2010 rates with 2012 erratum [40,41]. In both cases, we select all reactions among our selected species, and add the same set of additional reactions for vibrationally excited H2, UV ionization and photo-dissociation (based on detailed UV cross sections from the Leiden database [42], coupled to the radiative transfer), X-ray reactions [43], PAHcharging reactions, and ice formation (adsorption, thermal desorption, UV desorption, cosmic ray desorption), as well as H2 formation on grains and some surface chemistry, see [38].
Table 1
Assumed adsorption energies for some important ices, after [39].
Ice species
O
OH
H2O
O2
CO
CO2
CH3CO
C2H2
CH3
CH4
N
N2
NH3
Eads [K]
800
2850
4800
1000
1150
2990
4930
1400
1175
1090
800
790
5534
Assumed adsorption energies for some important ices, after [39].
Stage 1: The Dense Core Simulations
Stage 1 of our simulation is a simple one-point model for the dense cores of molecularclouds, where we advance our chemical rate network for a certain time, from initial atomic abundances typical for the diffuse interstellar medium.For the dense core conditions we adopt the following values as recommended for TMC-1 by [39]: temperatures Tgas = Tdust = 10 K, density n〈H〉 = 104 cm−3, extinction A = 10, dust particle density ndust = 1.8 × 10−8 cm−3 and dust size a = 0.1 μm. We assume large gas column densities in order to switch off the X-rays and have large molecular shielding factors. The integrationtime is chosen to be 1.7 × 105 years, the assumed lifetime of TMC-1 according to [39]. We note that these parameters are debated in the literature, see e.g., [44,45], where the resulting abundance of O2 is crucial, because O2 is not detected (observed concentration is <8×10−8 in TMC-1 [39]). Very recently, however, [46] reported on a 4.5σ detection of O2 from the molecularcloud surrounding the deeply embedded low-mass class-0 protostar NGC 1333-IRAS 4A. For the initial atomic abundances, we adopt the values from [39], see their Table 3.
Table 3
Parameters of the T Tauri type, class-II protoplanetary disk model.
Quantity
Symbol
Value
stellar mass
M⋆
0.7 M⊙
stellar luminosity
L⋆
1.0 L⊙
effective temperature
Teff
4000 K
UV luminosity
LUV
0.01 L⊙
X-ray luminosity
LX
1030 erg/s
minimum dust particle radius
amin
0.05 μm
maximum dust particle radius
amax
3 mm
dust size dist. power index
apow
3.5
dust settling turbulence parameter
α
0.001
max. hollow-sphere volume ratio
Vmax,HS
0.8
dust composition
Mg0.7Fe0.3SiO3
60%
(volume fractions)
amorph. carbon
15%
vacuum
25%
disk gas mass
Mgas
3 × 10−2M⊙
disk dust mass
Mdust
3 × 10−4M⊙
inner disk radius
Rin
0.07 AU
tapering-off radius
Rtap
50 AU
outer disk radius
Rout
200 AU
column density power index
∊
1.0
reference scale height
H0
10 AU
reference radius
r0
100 AU
flaring power index
β
1.12
cosmic ray ionization rate
ζCR
1.3 × 10−17 s−1 (⋆)
PAH abundance rel. to ISM
fPAH
0.01
chemical heating efficiency
γchem
0.2
(⋆) Standard value according to [39,40].
Assumed atomic and calculated abundances for dense core conditions. The latter are taken as initial values for the disk simulations in modeling stage 2. Numbers are particle concentrations with respect to hydrogen nuclei, “#” denote ice species, notation x(−y) means x × 10−. We only list a few species here, that are either abundant in the initial atomic (column “atomic”) or in the resultant chemical state.⋆ Reactions among our selection of species, and combined with other reactions, see text.The results of the dark core simulations are summarized in Table 2. We get an oxygen-rich gas where oxygen and nitrogenare mostly present in form of neutral atoms, and carbon in form of CO, with smaller quantities already frozen out as O#, OH#, H2O#, C#, CO#, N# and N2# ices. The low density and short lifetime assumed for TMC-1 avoid large concentrations of O2, and favor the formation of simple (e.g., atomic) ices, which have abundant atomic/molecularcounterparts in the gas phase, according to our simple ice chemistry. However, it must be noted that if we integrated our reaction network for slightly longer times, or higher densities, theO2concentration would increase rapidly, as is true in the original, pure gas-phase, UMIST-2012 network see [39]. Adding all gaseous concentrations together,
where, for example,
is the stoichiometriccoefficient of oxygen in molecule i, we get ∊O = 12 + log10〈Ogas〉 = 8.380 (8.381), ∊C = 8.030 (8.037), and ∊N = 7.754 (7.755), where the numbers in brackets refer to the model with theOSU rates. These values are close to the atomic abundances assumed in the first place, ∊O = 8.505, ∊C = 8.146 and ∊N = 7.875.
Table 2
Assumed atomic and calculated abundances for dense core conditions. The latter are taken as initial values for the disk simulations in modeling stage 2. Numbers are particle concentrations with respect to hydrogen nuclei, “#” denote ice species, notation x(−y) means x × 10−. We only list a few species here, that are either abundant in the initial atomic (column “atomic”) or in the resultant chemical state.
Atomic
UMIST 2012 ⋆
OSU 2010 ⋆
H
5 (−5)
2.6 (−4)
2.2 (−4)
H2
0.5
0.5
0.5
He
0.09
0.09
0.09
C+
1.4 (−4)
3.0 (−8)
1.5 (−8)
CO
0
5.9 (−5)
5.1 (−5)
C
0
4.1 (−5)
4.0 (−5)
C#
0
2.2 (−5)
2.3 (−5)
CO#
0
1.1 (−5)
8.1 (−6)
N
7.5 (−5)
4.9 (−5)
4.3 (−5)
N#
0
1.7 (−5)
1.6 (−5)
N2
0
3.9 (−6)
7.0 (−6)
N2#
0
5.8 (−7)
8.9 (−7)
HCN
0
1.1 (−7)
1.4 (−7)
HNC
0
1.0 (−7)
1.2 (−7)
O
3.2 (−4)
1.8 (−4)
1.9 (−4)
O#
0
4.1 (−5)
4.6 (−6)
OH#
0
1.9 (−5)
1.8 (−5)
H2O#
0
1.1 (−5)
7.6 (−6)
H2O
0
3.0 (−7)
7.6 (−7)
O2
0
1.3 (−8)
1.2 (−8)
S+
8 (−8)
7.4 (−10)
2.4 (−9)
S
0
6.1 (−8)
5.9 (−8)
S#
0
1.6 (−8)
1.2 (−8)
CS
0
2.0 (−9)
4.8 (−9)
CS#
0
6.1 (−10)
1.9 (−9)
Si+
8 (−9)
1.0 (−9)
7.6 (−11)
Si
0
3.9 (−9)
5.7 (−9)
SiO
0
1.9 (−9)
6.6 (−10)
Si#
0
8.9 (−10)
1.5 (−9)
SiO#
0
3.3 (−10)
1.3 (−10)
Mg+
7 (−9)
5.2 (−9)
4.9 (−9)
Mg
0
1.5 (−9)
1.7 (−9)
Mg#
0
3.6 (−10)
4.1 (−10)
Fe+
3 (−9)
2.3 (−9)
2.2 (−9)
Fe
0
5.9 (−10)
7.5 (−10)
Fe#
0
7.8 (−11)
8.3 (−11)
Ne
6.9 (−5)
6.9 (−5)
6.9 (−5)
Ar
1.5 (−6)
1.5 (−6)
1.5 (−6)
PAH
2.8 (−9)
8.1 (−10)
6.4 (−10)
PAH−
0
2.0 (−9)
2.1 (−9)
⋆ Reactions among our selection of species, and combined with other reactions, see text.
Stage 2: The Disk Simulations
We consider an example class-II protoplanetary disk with parameters as listed in Table 3. The parameters have been carefully chosen to match various continuum and line observations of class-II T Tauri stars concerning SED shape (clearly visible 10 μm and 20 μm silicate emissionfeatures, decreasing SED-slope beyond 20 μm, typical for non-transitional disks), near-IR excess (0.15 L⊙ between 2 μm and 7 μm), mm-flux (130 mJy at 140 pc), mm-slope β = −Δ log(F)/Δlog(λ) − 2 = 0.3, [OI] 63 μm line flux (4 × 10−17 W/m2 at 140 pc) and various CO sub-mm line fluxes. The stellar parameters describe a T Tauri star of spectral type K7 with an age of about 1.6 Myrs. The disk extends radially from 0.07 AU to 200 AU, and has an assumed radial surface density profile as
. The resulting densities in the midplane are n ≈ (1016
− 106) cm−3, depending on r, and the midplane temperatures are as low as T ≈ (300 − 5) K, encompassing radii r =0.15−200 AU (disregarding the hot inner rim with temperature ≈ 1500 K here). Dust settling is included according to [47], assuming an equilibrium between upward turbulent mixing and downward gravitational settling, which leads to higher dust/gas ratios in the midplane, in particular in the outer midplane. The midplane regions are entirely shielded from the stellar UV and even from the stellar X-rays. The vertical extinction of the midplane is A ≈ 1500 at 1 AU and still A ≈ 15 at r = 50 AU. The radial A are much larger.The above described conditions are typical for the midplane only, and we will entirely focus on thecentral midplane results in this paper, where planet formation occurs. Since stellar UV and X-rayscan penetrate the upper, thinner disk layers, these layers have a very different chemistry. The upper layers are much warmer, and the high-energy photons drive an active X-ray/photo-chemistry producing most of the observable line emissions. In these layers, thechemical relaxationtimescales are short, and the application of kineticchemical equilibrium is justified [36]. Therefore, it would be an error to generalize thechemical midplane results as described in this paper to the entire disk, or to the line-emitting regions.We use the dense core concentrations from Table 2 as initial values, reset theclock, and integrate forward our chemical rate network in disk configuration, using a well-iterated spatial density, temperature and radiation field structure of the disk obtained before with a standard model, where kineticchemical equilibrium is assumed. The physicalconditions in the 2D disk are hence kept constant in time during modeling stage 2.Parameters of the T Tauri type, class-II protoplanetary disk model.(⋆) Standard value according to [39,40].
Results
Thetime-dependent segregation of carbon, nitrogen and oxygen into gas and ice in the midplane is shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2, based on the models with the UMIST-2012 and theOSU-2010 rates, respectively. According to the model, the midplane is chemically subdivided into three different radial zones, separated by theH2O and CO ice-lines. The innermost zone (r < 0.6 AU, T < 150 K, n〈H〉
> 5 × 1014 cm−3) is too hot for any stable ices, hence the gas abundances are equal to the assumed total element abundances. The sum of gas and ice abundances is prescribed by the “element abundances” in the model. Abundant molecules here are H2O, CO, CO2, HCN, HNC, CH4 and NH3, similar to the ultra-cool atmospheres of brown dwarfs or giant gas planets (compare Figure 10).
Figure 1
Time evolution of total gas (solid) and total ice (dotted) abundances of oxygen (blue), carbon (black), and nitrogen (red) in the midplane, according to a time-dependent ProDiMo model, based on the UMIST-2012 rates, for a T Tauri type protoplanetary disk. The y-axis shows the concentration with respect to hydrogen nuclei, take this value +12 to get the usual element abundances ∊ (i.e., ∊ =12).
Figure 10
Atmospheric molecular number densities in chemical equilibrium for the planetary model atmosphere in Figure 8. Left: No element depletion by dust formation (C/Oinit = 0.99), Right: With element depletion by dust formation (O, Si, Mg, Fe, Ti, Ca, Al) resulting in the C/O ratio depicted in Figure 9 (C/O > 1 . . . 2).
Time evolution of total gas (solid) and total ice (dotted) abundances of oxygen (blue), carbon (black), and nitrogen (red) in the midplane, according to a time-dependent ProDiMo model, based on the UMIST-2012 rates, for a T Tauri type protoplanetary disk. The y-axis shows theconcentration with respect to hydrogen nuclei, take this value +12 to get the usual element abundances ∊ (i.e., ∊ =12).In the outer zone, beyond theCO ice-line (r > 13 AU, T < 25 K, n〈H〉
< 5 × 1011 cm−3), oxygen and carbonare quickly converted to ices (mainly H2O# and CO#). Nitrogen freezes out in form of N# and N2# a bit further out (r > 20 AU), because of the slightly lower adsorption energies. These statements are valid already after some 100 years. The initial freeze-out of condensable molecules is actually a very fast process (see Table 4). The adsorptiontimescale τads, i.e., thetimescale for a molecule to hit and stick to the surface of a grain is
where α ≈ 1 is the sticking coefficient, ndust [cm−3] the local dust particle density, 〈a2〉 the mean of the squared dust particle radii, averaged over thesize distribution, and
the thermal velocity of a molecule with mass m. In the disk model, for a molecule like water (m = 18 amu), this timescale is as short as 1 sec at the inner rim, and 100 years at the outer radius, despite the tapering-off surface density assumed. What turns the ice formation actually into a slow process is thechemicalconversion of the gas phase into condensable molecules prior to freeze-out.
Table 4
Carbon, nitrogen and oxygen gas abundances at selected times and locations in the disk, according to disk models using the UMIST-2012 and OSU-2010 chemical rates.
UMIST-2012
OSU-2010
0.3 AU
1 AU
3 AU
10 AU
30 AU
0.3 AU
1 AU
3 AU
10 AU
30 AU
t=0
∊(O)
8.38
8.38
8.38
8.38
8.38
8.38
8.38
8.38
8.38
8.38
∊(C)
8.03
8.03
8.03
8.03
8.03
8.04
8.04
8.04
8.04
8.04
∊(N)
7.75
7.75
7.75
7.75
7.75
7.75
7.75
7.75
7.75
7.75
t=100 years
∊(O)
8.51
8.49
8.46
8.35
2.41
8.51
8.49
8.47
8.36
4.47
∊(C)
8.15
8.15
8.14
7.83
5.56
8.15
8.15
8.14
7.84
4.63
∊(N)
7.88
7.87
7.87
7.86
5.03
7.88
7.88
7.87
7.87
2.55
t=1 Myr
∊(O)
8.51
8.46
8.42
8.12
1.37
8.51
8.32
8.45
8.26
1.43
∊(C)
8.15
8.15
8.14
7.70
1.24
8.15
8.15
8.14
7.76
1.33
∊(N)
7.88
7.88
7.87
7.85
1.75
7.88
7.88
7.87
7.86
1.95
t=3 Myrs
∊(O)
8.51
8.42
8.33
7.65
0.24
8.51
8.14
8.42
8.08
0.37
∊(C)
8.15
8.15
8.14
7.57
0.83
8.15
8.15
8.14
7.68
0.93
∊(N)
7.88
7.88
7.85
7.80
1.77
7.88
7.87
7.86
7.82
2.04
t=10 Myrs
∊(O)
8.51
8.27
8.09
6.80
−1.53
8.51
8.13
8.30
7.61
−1.53
∊(C)
8.15
8.15
8.09
6.79
−0.25
8.15
8.15
8.14
7.60
−0.12
∊(N)
7.88
7.87
7.80
7.37
1.73
7.88
7.84
7.82
7.71
2.02
t=30 Myrs
∊(O)
8.51
8.15
7.29
1.83
−1.53
8.51
8.13
8.06
7.18
−1.54
∊(C)
8.15
8.15
7.30
2.09
−0.39
8.15
8.15
8.06
7.19
−0.26
∊(N)
7.88
7.87
6.78
1.64
1.68
7.88
7.83
7.61
6.82
1.96
t=∞
∊(O)
8.51
8.15
−7.62
−24.8
−13.8
8.51
5.12
−5.18
−24.8
−13.8
∊(C)
8.15
8.15
6.73
−3.23
−2.38
8.15
7.93
8.03
−2.95
−2.02
∊(N)
7.88
7.87
−4.92
−29.3
−14.6
7.88
1.92
−12.9
−29.6
−14.5
Same as Figure 1, but for theProDiMo model based on theOSU-2010 rates.Thus, already after 1 Myrs, the distant midplane gas contains practically no molecules other than H2. The atmosphere of a Uranus or Neptune-like planets, if composed of such gas alone, would contain practically no oxygen, carbon or nitrogen.In the sandwich zone between theH2O and theCO ice-lines, that is between 0.6 AU and 13 AU in the particular model, the results are time-dependent. The earlier epochs (t ≲ 3 Myrs) are characterized by the slow build up of additionalH2O# from the abundant gas phase molecules CO, CO2, O2, N and N2. The slow formation of water ice is what makes our results differ from [17]. This is because of the initial formation of O2 parallel to H2O, and the temperatures being too warm for O2 to freeze out. This way, most of the gaseous oxygen in the midplane is soon locked into the stable and chemically inert O2. In order to form additionalH2O# under those circumstances, theO2 must be dissociated first, and this proceeds in the model either by cosmic ray ionizations or by reactions with C+, which are both slow processes.Figure 3 shows some details of thechemical paths involved. Initially, a helium atom is ionized by cosmicrays, and theHe+ collides with a CO molecule to dissociate it into C+ and O. TheC+ then attacks O2. If O2 is dissociated into neutral O atoms, quick radiative association reactions with other O atoms will re-form O2. However, when O+ is produced, there is a quick linear reactionchain which stepwise adds hydrogen atoms via reactions with H2 to form H3O+, and H3O+ then recombines at the surface of PAH molecules to form H2O, which then freezes out. Simplistically speaking, for every CO molecule un-blocked by cosmicrays, there will be one O2 molecule destroyed, and one new H2O# ice unit formed. The effective destructiontimescale for O2, in the example shown, is
in the UMIST-2012 model, and ≈ 6 Myrs in theOSU-2010 model. The difference between the two models can be traced back to theCR induced secondary UV reactionHe + CRphot → He+ + e, in addition to the primary reactionHe + CRP → He+ + e. The secondary reaction, which about doubles theionization rate of He, seems new in UMIST-2012 (compared to UMIST-2006), and was apparently not incorporated into theOSU-2010 reaction rates either. Consequently, our OSU-2010 model has about a factor of two less He+, and accordingly less C+, both required to form ionizedoxygen, the main precursor of water.Destruction of molecularoxygen and formation of water ice, after 1 Myr in the midplane of the UMIST-2012 model at 2.5 AU, where temperature and density are 75 K and 3 × 1013 cm−3, respectively. “#” denotes ice species. The red species indicate the reaction partners, and the blue numbers are the reaction rates in s−1cm−3.As O2 is slowly consumed and converted into H2O#, the gaseous C/O-ratio increases and reaches unity after about 5 Myrs, but thenC/O does not increase further. All timescales mentioned in the remainder of the text belong to the UMIST-2012 model, and scale with the assumed cosmic ray ionization rate. Although CO is continuously dissociated by cosmicrays (timescale about ∼ 6 Myrs in the UMIST-2012 model, ∼ 14 Myrs in theOSU-2010 model), the liberated O rather reacts with other molecules like CS and CN to reform CO. Some tiny amounts of H2O# do actually form via OH, but the associated timescale to convert CO into H2O#, in case C/O≈1, is huge, larger than 100 Myrs.Carbon, nitrogen and oxygen gas abundances at selected times and locations in the disk, according to disk models using the UMIST-2012 and OSU-2010 chemical rates.At later epochs (t ≳ 10 Myrs) additional, very stable ices with rare gaseous counterparts are formed, in particular NH2#, NH3#, C2H2#, CH3OH#, CH3# and CH4#. In fact, thesimple ices formed in the first place are now slowly converted into these “late ices” (see also [11,18]). Since our model has only very limited surface chemistry [38], this conversion requires to temporarily evaporate thesimple ices (by cosmic ray desorption), to convert the respective molecules in the gas phase into different ones by cosmic-ray chemistry, and then to freeze out the new molecules. These processes are extremely slow.At an age of about 10 Myrs, considerable fractions of the late ices have built up, and the sandwich zone starts to shrink from the outside in. The outer part of the former sandwich zone joins the outer disk in becoming virtually molecule-free (except for H2), while thesimple ices are steadily converted into their most stable, complex forms. The lower right plots in Figure 1 and Figure 2 shows the “fictive end stadium”, calculated in kineticchemical equilibrium, where nitrogen disappears from the gas phase at about 1.5 AU, triggered by NH3condensation, and gaseous carbon disappears at r ≳ 3 AU, due to thecondensation of C2H2 and CH3OH ices. Thechemical equilibrium model is also featured by C/O≫1 outside of about 1.5 AU where the remaining gas is devoid of CO. Instead, organic molecules are abundant, in form of small hydro-carbonchain molecules like C2, C3, C3H, C2H2 and C3H2.Because all chemical processes described above are driven by cosmic ray ionization, the associated timescales are density-independent, i.e., the whole disk will undergo thechemicalconversionC/O → 1 in a coherent way, between theH2O and CO ice-lines. However, the initial formation of the stable gases CO, O2, CO2, N2, etc., depends on localconditions and that explains the differences at one particulartime in Figure 1 and Figure 2. Thus, cosmicrays provide a “clock” for thechemicalconversionC/O → 1, driven by water ice formation, in the middle sections of protoplanetary disk midplanes (see Table 4).
Discussion
In this paper, we have investigated thechemical pre-conditions for planet formation, in terms of gas and ice abundances as function of time and position in the midplane of a protoplanetary disk. Under the dense and shielded conditions, thechemicalcomposition in the disk midplane soon becomes quite simple. Only the most stable, almost inert, neutral molecules like H2O, O2, CO, CO2, CH4, N2 and NH3 will soon contain the vast majority of the elements, similar as in brown dwarf atmospheres. At radii where the disk midplane is cold enough for thecorresponding ice phases to be thermally stable, those molecules freeze out after short times (≪ 103 year). After that initial short period of relaxation, thechemistry then “comes to a halt”, meaning that almost no chemical processes occur anymore in the disk midplane – thechemicaltimescales increase towards millions of years.All remaining chemical activity is then entirely due to cosmic ray (CR) hits, and we have applied a standard CR ionization rate of H2 of 1.3×10−17 s−1 [39] throughout the disk, which provides a slowly ticking clock, as with every dissociated O2 and CO molecule, there are opportunities to form other molecules which can freeze out, like water. The selective freeze-out of molecules containing oxygen leads to C/O → 1 in the gas phase inward of theCO ice-line (≈ 20 K), on timescales of several Myrs. The questionarises what happens if cosmicrays do not even reach the disk, but are shielded by magnetic fields or by inelasticcollisions with the surrounding gas, see e.g., [48]. In that case, the midplane ionization might be dominated by the decay of 26Al, resulting in a much lower midplane ionization rate of 4 × 10−19s−1 [49]. The results of this paper are still valid then, but with thetime-axis re-scaled. If theionization rate is indeed as low as 4 × 10−19s−1, there will be indeed no further chemical activity in the midplane during the lifetime of theprotoplanetary disk. If, however, theionization rate is 10× or 100× larger, for example if the star formation region has produced nearby supernova explosions, which produce new cosmicrays locally, theconversion to C/O → 1 might take only several 105 or 104 years, respectively.The large initial quantities of O2 predicted by our disk model may not be a reliable result. Molecularoxygen remains undetected in a small number of observed interstellarclouds of varying ages [50,51]. These observational findings by the SWAS/Odin missions have triggered new world-wide efforts to refine thechemical rate networks, and to include additionalcomplicated surface chemical processes. Different groups have presented different solutions how to keep theO2concentration within the observed limits under dark cloud conditions [44,45]. Assuming quite young ages for theclouds seems to provide the easiest solution [39], but typically results in an overabundance of gaseous H2O [52]. We, too, can avoid the over-prediction of O2 in the dark cloud model by assuming low densities and young cloud ages, but we cannot avoid the formation of massive amounts of O2 in the disk model during the first ∼105 years under the high-density conditions in the disk, neither with the UMIST-2012, nor with theOSU-2010 reaction rates. We are possibly missing some complicated surface-chemical processes which convert O2 on contact with dust grain surfaces.An alternative idea how to resolve theO2 mystery is to consider discharge processes (lightning) like in substellar atmospheres. The degree of ionization of the disk midplane can be altered, at least temporarily, by small-scale or large-scale discharge processes between single grains or ensembles of grains that undergo collisionalionization due to the turbulent character of the midplane disk material [53,54,55]. Such processes might trigger Alfvénionization of theO2 and other molecules in a weakly magnetized disk [56] potentially increasing thechemical activity in the disk midplane.Another effect, that has been disregarded in this paper, is that large planetesimals, especially the large parental bodies that form during oligarchic growth, may heat up internally due to theheating provided by radioactive decay of 26Al [57]. The questionarises then to what degree planet cores lose their ices, or even the more volatile constituents of their refractory material, just like comets do when they come too close to the sun, prior to the run-away gas accretion. These questions, however, go beyond the scope of this paper. If the ice elements C, N and O are completely returned to the gas phase, just prior to the rapid phase of gas accretion, the gas might re-gain its primordialC/N/O element composition, or may even locally exceed it, if the dust/gas ratio was locally enhanced, for example due to gravitational settling.
Cloud Formation Processes in Extrasolar Planets
Inspired by thecomplexity of thechanging carbon and oxygen abundances during the evolution of a protoplanetary disk, we present first tests of the impact of changing oxygen and carbon abundances on thecloud formation in ultra-cool, planetary atmospheres as one of the essential modeling complexes.All solar system planets with an atmospheres have clouds of various compositions. Only our Earth has exactly the right amount of clouds to allow vegetation to grow by letting the Sun-light pass through while still protecting the surface from too much Sun-light, and by transporting and releasing water over thecontinents. Extrasolar planets should also have clouds because their atmospheres are sufficiently cool, but their composition will be very different from what we know from Earth and the solar system; they are made of various kinds of minerals in giant gas planets or in warm atmosphere portions of cooler planets [2,3]. Transit observations of the exo-planet HD189733b [58,59] support these results by suggesting the presence of small silicate grains (haze) in the upper layers. Sub-micron size aerosol particles were suggested in the upper atmosphere of WASP-12b [60]. To complicate things, we cannot take cloud measurements of these exoplanets like we do for Earth and, to some extant, for Venus and Jupiter. This situation requires us to think carefully about thecloud formation processes and their consistent modeling in much more detail than needed for the solar system. The emphasis is here on thecoupling and simultaneous treatment of all possible processes as localsituations can vastly change from exo-planet to exo-planet. We will summaries the processes that lead to and are involved in the formation of atmosphericclouds in ultra-cool, planetary objects in the next section, and discuss relevant results of our cloud formation model for illustration. A comprehensive outline of the body of equations of our kinetic approach to cloud formation is given in [61].Approach used: All following results were obtained by solving a set of moment and element conservation equations (see [2,62,63]) for a prescribed model atmosphere structure. The moment equations describe the seed formation, growth/evaporation and gravitational settling for mixed grains made of 12 material species that form by 60 surface reactions. We use a Drift-Phoenix model structure for gas temperature, gas pressure and convective velocity as input [3]. Drift-Phoenix models use the same set of cloud model equations, only the number of condensing materials in lower than considered in this paper. The initial values for the element abundances were solar [1] but do change due to cloud formation as shown in Figure 5. We will depart from this assumption in Section 4. We note that the Drift-Phoenix model structure are calculated without the effect of an external radiation source.
Figure 5
Element abundances changing through mineral cloud formation in the atmosphere of a planet for the same model like in Figure 4. Plotted are the initial solar abundances (thin solid line), the actual gas-phase element abundances (dashed line), and the element abundances locked into the dust (thick solid line). The dust-to-gas ratio, ρd/ρg, is depicted for comparison (lowest panel).
Cloud Formation Processes
Cloud formation is an intrinsic non-equilibrium process during which the gas-phase constituents participate in a phase-transition from which thecloud particles emerge. No cloud particle can form in phase-equilibrium as the very nature of an equilibrium is to be the minimum energy state of a system where the system feels very comfortable in.Cloud formation in extrasolar atmospheres necessarily starts with the formation of seed particles because we cannot assume that the planetary object has a crust from which sand or ash particles are diffused upwards or injected into the atmosphere by volcanic eruptions. In terrestrial atmospheric literature, seed particles are referred to as cloud condensation nuclei. These are particles able to promote droplet formation at terrestrial atmosphericwater supersaturation levels. In more general terms, such seeds provide a surface onto which other materialcan condense more easily as surface reactions are considerably more efficient than the sum of chemical reactions leading to the formation of the seed. Figure 4 summarizes the results of our cloud model for one example atmosphere model.
Formation of seed particles: The formation of the first surface out of the gas phase proceeds by a number of subsequent chemical reactions that eventually result in small seed particles. Such a chain of chemical reactions can proceed by adding the same molecular unit (=monomer) during each reaction step (e.g., [64]) which is referred to as homogeneous nucleation. Heterogeneous nucleation occurs if different monomer units participate in different reaction steps to form larger molecules and eventually clusters (e.g., [65,66]). We apply theconcept of homogeneous nucleation to the formation of TiO2 seed particles. Figure 4 (2nd panel, left) shows that the nucleation rate (J*) peaks rather high in the atmosphere and falls off towards higher gas temperature (1st panel, left). The peak of thecloud particle number density (nd) coincides with the peak of the nucleation rate but the number density remains high towards higher temperature. This is a clearsign that cloud particles fall into the atmosphere and therefore do exist below the seed formation region.Growth, evaporation: Growth and evaporationare surface reaction onto a surface or off a surface, respectively. They are determined by thecomposition of the gas phase that provides the number density for surface reactions and leads to the formation of a substantial mantle of a grain or droplet on top of the seed. This mantle determines the mass, volume and main chemicalcomposition of thecloud particles. Many materials can be simultaneously thermally stable in a gas but these materials change depending on thecarbon-to-oxygen ratio and the abundance ratios of other elements. In principle, all stable and supersaturated materialcan grow simultaneously on a seed particle. Figure 4 (5th panel) shows the effective supersaturation ratios (Seff, [2]) for all materials involved here (TiO2[s], SiO[s], SiO2[s], Fe[s], FeO[s], Fe2O3[s], FeS[s], MgO[s], MgSiO3[s], Mg2SiO4[s], Al2O3[s], CaTiO3[s] with thecorresponding surface reactions as in Table 1 in [2]). This demonstrates that all materials are supersaturated at high atmospheric layers and subsequently achieve phase equilibrium deeper in thecloud: They grow until the gas-phase has reached phase-equilibrium for these particular materials. High-temperature condensates like Al2O3[s] (light blue), TiO2[s] (dark blue) and CaTiO3[s] (magenta) reach S = 1 at considerably higher temperatures where they under-saturated eventually and evaporate. This is particularly interesting if solid particles form from the gas-phase as thecomposing materials comprise silicates, oxides, and ironcompounds leading to the formation of grains of mixed materials [2,3,61,67]. The materialcomposition is shown in 4th panel in Figure 4 which only depicts silicates in orange/brown colors, Fe[s] and Fe-compounds in green, Al2O3[s] in light blue, TiO2[s] in dark blue, and CaTiO3[s] in magenta.Gravitational settling (rain-out): The equilibrium between friction and gravity determine how fast thecloud particles fall through the atmosphere ([62]). Thecloud particles will continue to grow and to change their materialcomposition during their way into denser and warmer atmospheric layers (Figure 4, 4th panel). Panel 2 of the same figure shows that thecloud expands well blow the region of efficient nucleation, hence, these particle fall in from above. The mean grain size (6th panel) is determined by the different dust formation processes that govern the dust formation at different sites in the atmosphere: The upper part of thecloud is governed by the nucleation process. Growth is very inefficient due to the low density of the ambient gas, hence, thecloud particles remain very small and haze-like. Once the particles sink into deeper layers, the surface growth process dominates, resulting in strongly increasing grain sizes, until pgas ∼ 0.001 bar in the model depicted. It follows a small minimum where all thesilicates evaporate (compare 4th panel). Fe[s]-growth picks up but the grain size does not change considerably during their remaining path through the atmosphere. A comparison with the drift velocity (6th panel, right) shows that the grains fall with almost constant speed through the atmosphere until they evaporate at the bottom of thecloud.Structure and physical properties of a mineralcloud in the atmosphere of a planet with Teff = 1300 K, log(g) = 3.0 and solar element abundances. The model atmosphere structure is taken from the Drift-Phoenix grid [3]. The solar Drift-Phoenix grid spans Teff = 1000. . . 3000 K, log(g) = 3.0. . . 6.0. 1st panel: left—gas phase temperature Tgas [K], right—time scale of convective up-mixing τmix [s]; 2nd panel: left—nucleation rate J* [cm−3 s−1], right—number density of dust particles nd [cm−3]; 3rd panel: growth velocity of different materials χ [cm/s]; 4th panel: particle materialcomposition in volume fraction V/Vs (∑s
Vs—total dust volume); 5th panel: effective supersaturation ratio for each material Seff; 6th panel: left—cloud particle mean size [μm], right—mean drift velocity vdr [cm/s]. Thecolor/line coding is the same for all panels and plots: TiO2[s]—solid blue, Mg2SiO4[s]—orange long-dash, MgO[s]—dark orange dot dash, SiO[s]—brown dost short dash, SiO2[s]—brown dot dash; Fe[s]—green dot long dash ; Al2O3[s]—cyan dotted, CaTiO33[s]—magenta dashed. Only a subset of all 12 materials is depicted.Element abundances changing through mineralcloud formation in the atmosphere of a planet for the same model like in Figure 4. Plotted are the initial solar abundances (thin solid line), the actual gas-phase element abundances (dashed line), and the element abundances locked into the dust (thick solid line). The dust-to-gas ratio, ρd/ρg, is depicted for comparison (lowest panel).Element depletion due to cloud formation: We have summarized thecloud formation processes above. Thecloud formation has a strong impact on the localchemistry by depleting those elements that participate in the formation of thecloud particles. Figure 5 demonstrates how the gas-phase element abundances change compared to the initial, canonical solar value for all elements that participate in thecloud particle formation in our model. Thecomparison with the dust-to-gas ratio (ρd/ρg, lowest panel) shows that most of the dust is present when most of the elements Mg, Si and O are locked in dust. Figure 5 also emphasises that a C/O ratioalone is not sufficient to characterise the element abundances of an objects as elements change their abundances individually according to their involvement in cloud formation (or ice condensation in theprotoplanetary disk to start with).
Changing Cloud Properties in Atmospheres with Non-solar Abundances
Cloud formation is determined by the local atmospheric properties, Tgas and ρgas, and the local element abundances, ∊i. Cloud formation has a strong feedback on ∊i due to element-dependent lock-up in thecloud particles, and on Tgas due to the dust opacity and due to element depletion that changes the gas opacity. Studying cloud formation in atmospheres with non-solar abundances affords us a first assessment of how different the localchemistry might be in newly forming planets that are exposed to changing element abundances with distance from the star and during the history of disk evolution itself. It is of importance to understand to which extent element abundances influence the results of our cloud modeling and/or the local gas-phase chemistry, and how this might require a re-interpretation of, for example, the tentative detection of carbon planets or theconclusions draw from accumulating uncertainties in element depletion by phase-equilibrium cloud models, initial element abundances, mixing ratios and quenching heights [4,31,32]. We concentrate on the effect of element abundances only and do not consider irradiation, photo- or ion-chemistry, nor atmosphericcirculation. Our results will therefore be directly applicable to planets in the outer portion of the disk where the host star’s radiation field does not play a significant role. Here, thechemicalcomposition in upper atmosphere above thecloud layer will be influences by cosmic ray chemistry [68]. Atmosphere models that take into account the presence of clouds in irradiated planets [69] consider a host star distance of <0.05 AU which is in theoxygen-rich part of our disk models where oxygen-reducing ice formation does not play a role (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The following study is applicable to directly imaged planets [30,70,71,72,73,74,75] and free-floating planets, e.g., [76,77]. The issue of non-solar element abundances is also relevant for the large number of close-in, irradiated planets as the element abundances are an essential input and output quantity.
Sub- and Super-solar Oxygen and Carbon Abundances
After presenting thecanonical result of our cloud formation model for a planetary atmosphere with the solar element abundances as initial values (Section 3), we manipulate the initial values for theoxygen and carbon abundances guided by theProDiMo disk model results (Section 2). Our aim is to present a first study of how much thecloud formation processes in a planetary atmosphere would change for different C/O ratios as to be expected in a protoplanetary disk. As pointed out in Section 2.3, all other elements can change too, but oxygen and carbon will dominate the remaining disk chemistry. Figure 1 and Figure 2 suggest that theC/O ratiochanges with disk age and with increasing radial distance from the star. The reason is the formation of water ice (H2O#) and CO-ice (CO#) at different radial distances >0.5 AU (ice lines). An almost pure H2/He gas is left already in young disks at radial distances beyond theCO2-ice line, hence, young planets forming at such distances would have an extremely metal-poor atmosphere in contrast to their host star’s element composition. At smaller radial distances from the star <13 AU, theoxygen and carbon abundances change time-dependently in the sandwich zone between theH2O-ice and theCO2-ice lines.In order to understand which effects changing C/O ratios have on thecloud structure, we consider lower (log ∊O = 8.6, log ∊C = 8.4) and higher (log ∊O = 8.9, log ∊C = 8.8) oxygen and carbon abundances compared to the solar values (log
= 8.87, log
= 8.55) that are commonly used in model atmosphere simulations. All other input quantities are kept the same. Element abundances are given relative to thehydrogen abundance (log ∊H = 12).Figure 6 shows that fundamentalcloud properties change due only to a change in oxygen/carbon abundance: The seed formation rate (top panel, TiO2 seeds) decreases with decreasing oxygen abundance and increasing carbon abundance, and this has fundamental implications for thecloud opacity as it changes the mean grain size (bottom panel). Decreasing oxygen and increasing carbon abundance have the same net effect of decreasing the amount of oxygen available for TiO2 molecules (seed monomer) to be formed. If more carbon is available, more oxygen will be locked in carbon-monoxide (CO). Hence, already small changes in ∊O and ∊C affect theTi-chemistry because Ti has a very low element abundance (see [63] Figure 5).
Figure 6
Cloud properties for different oxygen (∊ (O)) or carbon ∊ (C)) abundances for a pre-scribed Drift-Phoenix planetary model atmospheres (Teff =1300K, log(g)=3.0). Top: nucleation rate, J* [cm−3 s−1]; Middle: number of cloud particles, nd [cm−3]; Bottom: mean size of cloud particles, [μm].
The lower rate of seed formation results in less cloud particles being formed (middle panel, Figure 6). Clouds in a low-oxygen abundance gas (but still C/O<1; dashed and long-dashed line) do have fewer cloud particles, suggesting a more transparent haze layer. These particles will rain into the denser atmosphere and grow to bigger sizes than in the solar abundance case (solid line). The maximum grain size increases from 0.4μm in the solarcase to about 1μm due solely to a moderate decrease of theoxygen abundance (or increase of ∊C). We note that an increase of ∊O to values larger than the solar values and a decrease of ∊C below the solar value does not have any effect on thecloud properties. The reason is that all possible binding partners (Si, Fe, Mg, Al) to O have much lower element abundances and are already locked up in molecules. TheCO molecule acts as an oxygen-sink and no increase of carboncould change this under theconditions of gas-phase chemical equilibrium applied here. This leads to theconclusion that thecloud properties would change further if theSi, Fe, Mg, Al abundances would change too. At a first glance, this would mean that less materialcould grow onto seed particles. However, the gas-phase chemistry may offer other surface reactions than those used in our cloud formation model (Table 1, [2]).We test the implication of thechanging effective oxygen abundance on the dust-to-gas ratio, ρd/ρg, in planetary atmospheres (Figure 7). The largest change of about a factor of 10 occurs for a decreasing oxygen abundance which supports our conclusions from Figure 1 and Figure 2 above.
Figure 7
Changing atmospheric dust-to-gas ratio with changing initial element abundances for models depicted in Figure 6. Shown are the solar case (solid line) and the sub-solar case for ∊O = 8.6 (dashed line). No differences in the ρd/ρg ratio were found for the other cases.
Cloud properties for different oxygen (∊ (O)) or carbon ∊ (C)) abundances for a pre-scribed Drift-Phoenix planetary model atmospheres (Teff =1300K, log(g)=3.0). Top: nucleation rate, J* [cm−3 s−1]; Middle: number of cloud particles, nd [cm−3]; Bottom: mean size of cloud particles, [μm].Changing atmospheric dust-to-gas ratio with changing initial element abundances for models depicted in Figure 6. Shown are the solarcase (solid line) and the sub-solarcase for ∊O = 8.6 (dashed line). No differences in the ρd/ρg ratio were found for the other cases.
Sub-solar Oxygen and Carbon Abundances at the Extreme: C/O = 0.99
The outstanding question is if carbon-rich planets could exist around oxygen-rich host stars. Thecore-accretion scenario for planet formation does not presently suggest the in-situ formation of carbon-rich planets, unless models are very much simplified to match the observations. We have shown that cloud formation might play a crucial role in tipping over an oxygen-rich atmospheric gas composition locally towards a carbon-rich atmospheric gas, due to the additional formation of oxygen-rich dust in the atmosphere. We have tested this hypothesis by decreasing theoxygen abundances in our cloud formation Drift code to values as low as suggested by ProDiMo (∊O = 8.07, ∊C = 8.06) approaching C/O ≈ 1. Figure 8 shows the results for thecloud structure (left) and the element abundances (right): The seed formation rate is very low compared to all results from the previous sections due to the much lower oxygen abundance. TiO2-seed formation is still possible due to a small surplus of oxygen that is not locked by CO. But considerably less particles are formed and two detached nucleation maxima determine the number of cloud particles. The upper most nucleation event is killed off by theoxygen-consumption during the growth process involving TiO-molecules. Nucleation resumes only where the atmospheric density is sufficiently high and the temperature sufficiently low. Note that Figure 8 (left) shows the peak values of the nucleation rate, and that the atmospheric range affected by nucleation and growth extends towards considerably lower pressures (compare Figure 8, right).
Figure 8
Cloud structure results for a gas of C/Oinit=0.99 ∊O = 8.07, ∊C = 8.06) for the same Drift-Phoenix atmosphere model as in the previous figures. Left: Cloud structure and physical properties. Right: Element abundances changing through mineral cloud formation. In both figures, the same line coding is used as in Figure 4 and Figure 5.
Thecompetition for condensable material become apparent from the double-peaked nucleation rate J*: The growth of silicatesconsumed oxygen which decreases the number of TiO2 molecules in the gas, causing the nucleation process to stop. A local increase of the mean grain size results and the grains form a semi-detached haze layer of 0.1 μm silicate grains. The second nucleation peak coincides with a decreasing grain size just on top of a deeper cloud layer of an almost constant grain size of 1 μm.Cloud structure results for a gas of C/Oinit=0.99 ∊O = 8.07, ∊C = 8.06) for the same Drift-Phoenix atmosphere model as in the previous figures. Left: Cloud structure and physical properties. Right: Element abundances changing through mineralcloud formation. In both figures, the same line coding is used as in Figure 4 and Figure 5.
Implications for the Chemical Composition of the Atmosphere
The gas-phase composition is determined by the local temperature (and density) and the local element abundances. Both are affected by cloud formationsince cloud formationcauses a considerable element depletion of the gas phase. TheC/O-ratio of a cloud forming atmosphere with an initialC/Oinit = 0.99 can increase to values C/O> 1 . . . 2 alone due to oxygen depletion by cloud formation (Figure 9). As a result of cloud formation, the atmosphere can become locally very carbon-rich. We, however, do not find C/O ratios ∼100. Our results suggest further that young planets that accrete their first atmosphere from the disk dust and gas will most likely have a strongly oxygen-depleted. This is because the primordial gas will condense more easily onto the previous disk grains due to an increased local density during accretion. CosmicRayscan enhance the fraction of hydro-carbon molecules (via ion-neutral reaction) [68], a process that can be considerably more efficient in an atmosphere that is oxygen-depleted as result of disk evolution and cloud formation.
Figure 9
C/O ratio after cloud formation from an initial element abundance with C/Oinit = 0.99 (∊O = 8.07, ∊C = 8.06; all other elements solar). The oxygen depletion by cloud formation clearly tips the gas-phase from an oxygen-dominated to a carbon-dominated chemistry.
C/O ratio after cloud formation from an initial element abundance with C/Oinit = 0.99 (∊O = 8.07, ∊C = 8.06; all other elements solar). Theoxygen depletion by cloud formationclearly tips the gas-phase from an oxygen-dominated to a carbon-dominated chemistry.We have performed a calculation of the gas-phase composition of the atmosphere depicted in Figure 8 by applying our chemical equilibrium code [4]. This code allows us to see how the abundance of molecules that are strong opacity carriers in oxygen-rich atmosphere (H2O, CO, SiO, TiO) change if the localC/O ratiochanges. We also consider CH4 and NH3 which are discussed as possible bio-marker molecules, and hydrocarbonchains and cyano-molecules. The abundance of these molecules is shown in the left panel of Figure 10 for C/Oinit = 0.99 with no element depletion by dust formation as reference values for thecase with element depletion by dust formation (right pane) causing C/O> 1. In the left panel, the dust only influences the local temperature structure causing the drop of CO at 10−7 bar in the model results shown. We note the increasing abundance of hydrocarbonchains (C2H2, C2H6, C2H3) and HCN with increasing pressure below thecloud layer. The molecularchemical equilibrium abundances for a gas with C/O close to unity (but not quit 1) is very sensitive to small changes in theoxygen/carbon abundance. This result is not new and was discussed for S-type AGB stars by e.g., [78]. Hydrocarbon absorption were observed in S-type AGB stars while it is surprisingly difficult to identify PAH absorptionfeature in carbon-rich AGB stars, e.g., [79].The number densities of all typicaloxygen-rich gas phase molecules decreases considerably with C/O> 1. In thecloud layers, H2O remains the most abundant species after H2. TheH2O, CO and theSiO gas abundances in particularare a negative fingerprint of the dust growth process (e.g., 4th panel, left of Figure 8). CH4 and NH3 become more abundant than CO in thecloud formation zone because it is not affected by the element depletion due to cloud formation. As before, NH3 and CH4are of similar abundance, but CH4 is somewhat more abundant than NH3. The largest difference between the depleted (right of Figure 10) and the un-depleted case (left of Figure 10) is the increasing abundances of H2O, CH4, HCN, NH3, C2H2 and C2H6 in the low-pressure regime near thecloud top. HCN becomes relatively more important which is typical for low-metallicity gases nearC/O = 1.Atmospheric molecular number densities in chemical equilibrium for the planetary model atmosphere in Figure 8. Left: No element depletion by dust formation (C/Oinit = 0.99), Right: With element depletion by dust formation (O, Si, Mg, Fe, Ti, Ca, Al) resulting in theC/O ratio depicted in Figure 9 (C/O > 1 . . . 2).
Conclusions
We have discussed thechemical preconditions for planet formation in protoplanetary disks, with emphasis on thetime-dependent segregation of carbon, nitrogen and oxygen into gas and ice phases. We obtained the following results:The segregation into gas and ice phases beyond thewater ice-line (the “snowline”) result in a rich variety of gaseous oxygen, carbon, and nitrogen abundances in the midplanes of protoplanetary disks, depending on time, position in the disk, and cosmic ray ionization rate. The resulting gas element abundances can vastly differ from that of the host star.Inside of the snowline (≳150 K) all considered ice phases are thermally unstable, and the gas phase abundances remain primordial.Beyond theCO ice-line (≲20 K) oxygen, carbon and nitrogen freeze out quickly, and already after ≪103 years, the outer midplane barely contains any molecules other than H2. This may be different though, for the outermost midplane which is transparent to interstellar UV and X-ray irradiation, as well as for scattered stellar UV and X-ray irradiation.Between the snowline and theCO ice-line, a slow transition from O-rich to C/O → 1 takes place, on timescales of ∼ 3 Myrs. This timescale is related to thecosmic-ray induced un-blocking of O2 and CO, and scales with thecosmic ray ionization rate assumed.For very long-lived protoplanetary disks, or disks exposed to an unusually high cosmic ray ionization rate, thecarbon-to-oxygen ratioC/O would eventually exceed unity, leading to a sudden occurrence of organic molecules in the midplane, and providing thechemical pre-conditions for the formation of carbon planets.Following the standard core-accretion model, it is this element-depleted gas that will be finally accreted onto the proto-planet in a rapid run-away phase, to eventually form the planetary atmosphere, although many difficult questions remain open, like the subsequent bombardment with left-over planetesimals, or the previous internalheating and outgasing of the planetesimals due to radioactive decay of 26Al. However, in agreement with [17], we conclude that a super-solarC/O ratio (but C/O≲1) is the most likely result from the gas-ice segregation in the disk, between the snowline and theCO ice-line.In the remainder of this paper, we have studied how thecloud formation in young planetary atmospheres is affected by decreased oxygen abundances. Our results are applicable to directly imaged planets like HB 8799b,c,d,e, GQ Lupi or β Pic b, and free-floating planets. But the issue of non-solar element abundances has biased also our understanding of the atmospheres of the large number of close-in, irradiated planets. Cloud formation depends strongly on the local element abundances involved (Fe, Ti, Si, O, . . .) and it strongly affects the local elements by element depletion or enrichment. Theconsequence is a strong influence of thecloud formation on the local opacity, and hence on the atmosphere’s temperature structure. Theoxygen abundance has a strong impact on the seed particle formation rate which initiates thecloud formation process. The reduced number of seed particles leads to a lower number density of cloud particles which hence grow to larger sizes throughout most of thecloud in an atmosphere with C/O≲1. This sequence of processes leads to a more transparent haze layer on low-C/O planet compared to a solar abundance (or solar-abdundance scaled) atmospheres. However, an increasing oxygen abundance does not automatically cause more cloud particles to be formed because the nucleation rate is determined by the monomer density, not by theoxygen abundance alone. We further observe the appearance of a semi-detached cloud layer with C/O→1.We conclude that the differences in element abundances with radial distance in protoplanetary disk have broad implications for thecloud properties in planetary atmospheres. The element abundances are, however not a multiple of the set of solar abundances. Using the results of our disk models as input for our cloud and chemistry calculation did only result in C/O ≈ 2, and and we can not confirm element abundances in planetary atmospheres as high as 100× the solar values. Planetary atmospheres might still carry signatures of the initial abundances of the gas in theprotoplanetary disks from which they were once formed. However, it seems difficult to detect these signatures from spectroscopy directly, because cloud formationchanges the gaseous element abundances.We further have demonstrated that it is not straight-forward to argue for the formation of carbon-rich planets (Figure 1 and Figure 2) and that some fine-tuning would be necessary in order to end up with a planet that exhibits spectralsignatures typical for a carbon-rich gas. So far, only additional processes like element depletion by dust cloud formation and condensation adequately explain observations of planetary atmospheres rich in carbon-binding molecules.
Authors: Lars A Buchhave; David W Latham; Anders Johansen; Martin Bizzarro; Guillermo Torres; Jason F Rowe; Natalie M Batalha; William J Borucki; Erik Brugamyer; Caroline Caldwell; Stephen T Bryson; David R Ciardi; William D Cochran; Michael Endl; Gilbert A Esquerdo; Eric B Ford; John C Geary; Ronald L Gilliland; Terese Hansen; Howard Isaacson; John B Laird; Philip W Lucas; Geoffrey W Marcy; Jon A Morse; Paul Robertson; Avi Shporer; Robert P Stefanik; Martin Still; Samuel N Quinn Journal: Nature Date: 2012-06-13 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Nikku Madhusudhan; Joseph Harrington; Kevin B Stevenson; Sarah Nymeyer; Christopher J Campo; Peter J Wheatley; Drake Deming; Jasmina Blecic; Ryan A Hardy; Nate B Lust; David R Anderson; Andrew Collier-Cameron; Christopher B T Britt; William C Bowman; Leslie Hebb; Coel Hellier; Pierre F L Maxted; Don Pollacco; Richard G West Journal: Nature Date: 2010-12-08 Impact factor: 49.962