| Literature DB >> 25370190 |
Christiane Helling1, Peter Woitke2, Paul B Rimmer3, Inga Kamp4, Wing-Fai Thi5, Rowin Meijerink6.
Abstract
We discuss the cEntities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25370190 PMCID: PMC4187161 DOI: 10.3390/life4020142
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Life (Basel) ISSN: 2075-1729
Figure 2Same as Figure 1, but for the ProDiMo model based on the OSU-2010 rates.
Figure 3Destruction of molecular oxygen and formation of water ice, after 1 Myr in the midplane of the UMIST-2012 model at 2.5 AU, where temperature and density are 75 K and 3 × 1013 cm−3, respectively. “#” denotes ice species. The red species indicate the reaction partners, and the blue numbers are the reaction rates in s−1cm−3.
Assumed adsorption energies for some important ices, after [39].
| 800 | 2850 | 4800 | 1000 | 1150 | 2990 | 4930 | 1400 | 1175 | 1090 | 800 | 790 | 5534 |
Parameters of the T Tauri type, class-II protoplanetary disk model.
| stellar mass | 0.7 | |
| stellar luminosity | 1.0 | |
| effective temperature | 4000 K | |
| UV luminosity | 0.01 | |
| X-ray luminosity | 1030 erg/s | |
|
| ||
| minimum dust particle radius | 0.05 μm | |
| maximum dust particle radius | 3 mm | |
| dust size dist. power index | 3.5 | |
| dust settling turbulence parameter | 0.001 | |
| max. hollow-sphere volume ratio | 0.8 | |
| dust composition | Mg0.7Fe0.3SiO3 | 60% |
| (volume fractions) | amorph. carbon | 15% |
| vacuum | 25% | |
|
| ||
| disk gas mass | 3 × 10−2
| |
| disk dust mass | 3 × 10−4
| |
| inner disk radius | 0.07 AU | |
| tapering-off radius | 50 AU | |
| outer disk radius | 200 AU | |
| column density power index | 1.0 | |
| reference scale height | 10 AU | |
| reference radius | 100 AU | |
| flaring power index | 1.12 | |
|
| ||
| cosmic ray ionization rate | 1.3 × 10−17 s−1 (⋆) | |
| PAH abundance rel. to ISM | 0.01 | |
| chemical heating efficiency | 0.2 | |
(⋆) Standard value according to [39,40].
Assumed atomic and calculated abundances for dense core conditions. The latter are taken as initial values for the disk simulations in modeling stage 2. Numbers are particle concentrations with respect to hydrogen nuclei, “#” denote ice species, notation x(−y) means x × 10−. We only list a few species here, that are either abundant in the initial atomic (column “atomic”) or in the resultant chemical state.
| H | 5 (−5) | 2.6 (−4) | 2.2 (−4) |
| H2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
|
| |||
| He | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.09 |
|
| |||
| C+ | 1.4 (−4) | 3.0 (−8) | 1.5 (−8) |
| CO | 0 | 5.9 (−5) | 5.1 (−5) |
| C | 0 | 4.1 (−5) | 4.0 (−5) |
| C# | 0 | 2.2 (−5) | 2.3 (−5) |
| CO# | 0 | 1.1 (−5) | 8.1 (−6) |
|
| |||
| N | 7.5 (−5) | 4.9 (−5) | 4.3 (−5) |
| N# | 0 | 1.7 (−5) | 1.6 (−5) |
| N2 | 0 | 3.9 (−6) | 7.0 (−6) |
| N2# | 0 | 5.8 (−7) | 8.9 (−7) |
| HCN | 0 | 1.1 (−7) | 1.4 (−7) |
| HNC | 0 | 1.0 (−7) | 1.2 (−7) |
|
| |||
| O | 3.2 (−4) | 1.8 (−4) | 1.9 (−4) |
| O# | 0 | 4.1 (−5) | 4.6 (−6) |
| OH# | 0 | 1.9 (−5) | 1.8 (−5) |
| H2O# | 0 | 1.1 (−5) | 7.6 (−6) |
| H2O | 0 | 3.0 (−7) | 7.6 (−7) |
| O2 | 0 | 1.3 (−8) | 1.2 (−8) |
|
| |||
| S+ | 8 (−8) | 7.4 (−10) | 2.4 (−9) |
| S | 0 | 6.1 (−8) | 5.9 (−8) |
| S# | 0 | 1.6 (−8) | 1.2 (−8) |
| CS | 0 | 2.0 (−9) | 4.8 (−9) |
| CS# | 0 | 6.1 (−10) | 1.9 (−9) |
|
| |||
| Si+ | 8 (−9) | 1.0 (−9) | 7.6 (−11) |
| Si | 0 | 3.9 (−9) | 5.7 (−9) |
| SiO | 0 | 1.9 (−9) | 6.6 (−10) |
| Si# | 0 | 8.9 (−10) | 1.5 (−9) |
| SiO# | 0 | 3.3 (−10) | 1.3 (−10) |
|
| |||
| Mg+ | 7 (−9) | 5.2 (−9) | 4.9 (−9) |
| Mg | 0 | 1.5 (−9) | 1.7 (−9) |
| Mg# | 0 | 3.6 (−10) | 4.1 (−10) |
|
| |||
| Fe+ | 3 (−9) | 2.3 (−9) | 2.2 (−9) |
| Fe | 0 | 5.9 (−10) | 7.5 (−10) |
| Fe# | 0 | 7.8 (−11) | 8.3 (−11) |
|
| |||
| Ne | 6.9 (−5) | 6.9 (−5) | 6.9 (−5) |
|
| |||
| Ar | 1.5 (−6) | 1.5 (−6) | 1.5 (−6) |
|
| |||
| PAH | 2.8 (−9) | 8.1 (−10) | 6.4 (−10) |
| PAH | 0 | 2.0 (−9) | 2.1 (−9) |
⋆ Reactions among our selection of species, and combined with other reactions, see text.
Figure 1Time evolution of total gas (solid) and total ice (dotted) abundances of oxygen (blue), carbon (black), and nitrogen (red) in the midplane, according to a time-dependent ProDiMo model, based on the UMIST-2012 rates, for a T Tauri type protoplanetary disk. The y-axis shows the concentration with respect to hydrogen nuclei, take this value +12 to get the usual element abundances ∊ (i.e., ∊ =12).
Figure 10Atmospheric molecular number densities in chemical equilibrium for the planetary model atmosphere in Figure 8. Left: No element depletion by dust formation (C/Oinit = 0.99), Right: With element depletion by dust formation (O, Si, Mg, Fe, Ti, Ca, Al) resulting in the C/O ratio depicted in Figure 9 (C/O > 1 . . . 2).
Carbon, nitrogen and oxygen gas abundances at selected times and locations in the disk, according to disk models using the UMIST-2012 and OSU-2010 chemical rates.
|
| ||||||||||
| 8.38 | 8.38 | 8.38 | 8.38 | 8.38 | 8.38 | 8.38 | 8.38 | 8.38 | 8.38 | |
| 8.03 | 8.03 | 8.03 | 8.03 | 8.03 | 8.04 | 8.04 | 8.04 | 8.04 | 8.04 | |
| 7.75 | 7.75 | 7.75 | 7.75 | 7.75 | 7.75 | 7.75 | 7.75 | 7.75 | 7.75 | |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| 8.51 | 8.49 | 8.46 | 8.35 | 2.41 | 8.51 | 8.49 | 8.47 | 8.36 | 4.47 | |
| 8.15 | 8.15 | 8.14 | 7.83 | 5.56 | 8.15 | 8.15 | 8.14 | 7.84 | 4.63 | |
| 7.88 | 7.87 | 7.87 | 7.86 | 5.03 | 7.88 | 7.88 | 7.87 | 7.87 | 2.55 | |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| 8.51 | 8.46 | 8.42 | 8.12 | 1.37 | 8.51 | 8.32 | 8.45 | 8.26 | 1.43 | |
| 8.15 | 8.15 | 8.14 | 7.70 | 1.24 | 8.15 | 8.15 | 8.14 | 7.76 | 1.33 | |
| 7.88 | 7.88 | 7.87 | 7.85 | 1.75 | 7.88 | 7.88 | 7.87 | 7.86 | 1.95 | |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| 8.51 | 8.42 | 8.33 | 7.65 | 0.24 | 8.51 | 8.14 | 8.42 | 8.08 | 0.37 | |
| 8.15 | 8.15 | 8.14 | 7.57 | 0.83 | 8.15 | 8.15 | 8.14 | 7.68 | 0.93 | |
| 7.88 | 7.88 | 7.85 | 7.80 | 1.77 | 7.88 | 7.87 | 7.86 | 7.82 | 2.04 | |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| 8.51 | 8.27 | 8.09 | 6.80 | −1.53 | 8.51 | 8.13 | 8.30 | 7.61 | −1.53 | |
| 8.15 | 8.15 | 8.09 | 6.79 | −0.25 | 8.15 | 8.15 | 8.14 | 7.60 | −0.12 | |
| 7.88 | 7.87 | 7.80 | 7.37 | 1.73 | 7.88 | 7.84 | 7.82 | 7.71 | 2.02 | |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| 8.51 | 8.15 | 7.29 | 1.83 | −1.53 | 8.51 | 8.13 | 8.06 | 7.18 | −1.54 | |
| 8.15 | 8.15 | 7.30 | 2.09 | −0.39 | 8.15 | 8.15 | 8.06 | 7.19 | −0.26 | |
| 7.88 | 7.87 | 6.78 | 1.64 | 1.68 | 7.88 | 7.83 | 7.61 | 6.82 | 1.96 | |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| 8.51 | 8.15 | −7.62 | −24.8 | −13.8 | 8.51 | 5.12 | −5.18 | −24.8 | −13.8 | |
| 8.15 | 8.15 | 6.73 | −3.23 | −2.38 | 8.15 | 7.93 | 8.03 | −2.95 | −2.02 | |
| 7.88 | 7.87 | −4.92 | −29.3 | −14.6 | 7.88 | 1.92 | −12.9 | −29.6 | −14.5 | |
Figure 5Element abundances changing through mineral cloud formation in the atmosphere of a planet for the same model like in Figure 4. Plotted are the initial solar abundances (thin solid line), the actual gas-phase element abundances (dashed line), and the element abundances locked into the dust (thick solid line). The dust-to-gas ratio, ρd/ρg, is depicted for comparison (lowest panel).
Figure 4Structure and physical properties of a mineral cloud in the atmosphere of a planet with Teff = 1300 K, log(g) = 3.0 and solar element abundances. The model atmosphere structure is taken from the Drift-Phoenix grid [3]. The solar Drift-Phoenix grid spans Teff = 1000. . . 3000 K, log(g) = 3.0. . . 6.0. 1st panel: left—gas phase temperature Tgas [K], right—time scale of convective up-mixing τmix [s]; 2nd panel: left—nucleation rate J* [cm−3 s−1], right—number density of dust particles nd [cm−3]; 3rd panel: growth velocity of different materials χ [cm/s]; 4th panel: particle material composition in volume fraction V/Vs (∑s Vs—total dust volume); 5th panel: effective supersaturation ratio for each material Seff; 6th panel: left—cloud particle mean size [μm], right—mean drift velocity vdr [cm/s]. The color/line coding is the same for all panels and plots: TiO2[s]—solid blue, Mg2SiO4[s]—orange long-dash, MgO[s]—dark orange dot dash, SiO[s]—brown dost short dash, SiO2[s]—brown dot dash; Fe[s]—green dot long dash ; Al2O3[s]—cyan dotted, CaTiO33[s]—magenta dashed. Only a subset of all 12 materials is depicted.
Figure 6Cloud properties for different oxygen (∊ (O)) or carbon ∊ (C)) abundances for a pre-scribed Drift-Phoenix planetary model atmospheres (Teff =1300K, log(g)=3.0). Top: nucleation rate, J* [cm−3 s−1]; Middle: number of cloud particles, nd [cm−3]; Bottom: mean size of cloud particles, [μm].
Figure 7Changing atmospheric dust-to-gas ratio with changing initial element abundances for models depicted in Figure 6. Shown are the solar case (solid line) and the sub-solar case for ∊O = 8.6 (dashed line). No differences in the ρd/ρg ratio were found for the other cases.
Figure 8Cloud structure results for a gas of C/Oinit=0.99 ∊O = 8.07, ∊C = 8.06) for the same Drift-Phoenix atmosphere model as in the previous figures. Left: Cloud structure and physical properties. Right: Element abundances changing through mineral cloud formation. In both figures, the same line coding is used as in Figure 4 and Figure 5.
Figure 9C/O ratio after cloud formation from an initial element abundance with C/Oinit = 0.99 (∊O = 8.07, ∊C = 8.06; all other elements solar). The oxygen depletion by cloud formation clearly tips the gas-phase from an oxygen-dominated to a carbon-dominated chemistry.