R Huo1,2, T Du1, Y Xu1, W Xu1, X Chen1, K Sun2, X Yu1. 1. Department of Endocrinology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. 2. Department of Endocrinology, First Hospital Affiliated to Medical College of Shihezi University, Shihezi, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Studies suggest that the Mediterranean-style diet (MSD) may improve glucose metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), but the results are inconsistent. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to explore the effects of MSD on glycemic control, weight loss and cardiovascular risk factors in T2D patients. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: We performed searches of EMBASE, Cochrane Library and PubMed databases up to February 2014. We included RCTs that compared the MSD with control diets in patients with T2D. Effect size was estimated as mean difference with 95% confidence interval (CI) by using random effect models. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included nine studies with 1178 patients. Compared with control diets, MSD led to greater reductions in hemoglobin A1c (mean difference, -0.30; 95% CI, -0.46 to -0.14), fasting plasma glucose (-0.72 mmol/l; CI, -1.24 to -0.21), fasting insulin (-0.55 μU/ml; CI, -0.81 to -0.29), body mass index (-0.29 kg/m(2); CI, -0.46 to -0.12) and body weight (-0.29 kg; CI, -0.55 to -0.04). Likewise, concentrations of total cholesterol and triglyceride were decreased (-0.14 mmol/l; CI, -0.19 to -0.09 and -0.29 mmol/l; CI, -0.47 to -0.10, respectively), and high-density lipoprotein was increased (0.06 mmol/l; CI, 0.02 to 0.10). In addition, MSD was associated with a decline of 1.45 mm Hg (CI, -1.97 to -0.94) for systolic blood pressure and 1.41 mm Hg (CI, -1.84 to -0.97) for diastolic blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis provides evidence that MSD improves outcomes of glycemic control, body weight and cardiovascular risk factors in T2D patients.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Studies suggest that the Mediterranean-style diet (MSD) may improve glucose metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), but the results are inconsistent. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to explore the effects of MSD on glycemic control, weight loss and cardiovascular risk factors in T2D patients. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: We performed searches of EMBASE, Cochrane Library and PubMed databases up to February 2014. We included RCTs that compared the MSD with control diets in patients with T2D. Effect size was estimated as mean difference with 95% confidence interval (CI) by using random effect models. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included nine studies with 1178 patients. Compared with control diets, MSD led to greater reductions in hemoglobin A1c (mean difference, -0.30; 95% CI, -0.46 to -0.14), fasting plasma glucose (-0.72 mmol/l; CI, -1.24 to -0.21), fasting insulin (-0.55 μU/ml; CI, -0.81 to -0.29), body mass index (-0.29 kg/m(2); CI, -0.46 to -0.12) and body weight (-0.29 kg; CI, -0.55 to -0.04). Likewise, concentrations of total cholesterol and triglyceride were decreased (-0.14 mmol/l; CI, -0.19 to -0.09 and -0.29 mmol/l; CI, -0.47 to -0.10, respectively), and high-density lipoprotein was increased (0.06 mmol/l; CI, 0.02 to 0.10). In addition, MSD was associated with a decline of 1.45 mm Hg (CI, -1.97 to -0.94) for systolic blood pressure and 1.41 mm Hg (CI, -1.84 to -0.97) for diastolic blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis provides evidence that MSD improves outcomes of glycemic control, body weight and cardiovascular risk factors in T2D patients.
Authors: Natasha Wiebe; Ben Vandermeer; Robert W Platt; Terry P Klassen; David Moher; Nicholas J Barrowman Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Ramon Estruch; Miguel Angel Martínez-González; Dolores Corella; Jordi Salas-Salvadó; Valentina Ruiz-Gutiérrez; María Isabel Covas; Miguel Fiol; Enrique Gómez-Gracia; Mari Carmen López-Sabater; Ernest Vinyoles; Fernando Arós; Manuel Conde; Carlos Lahoz; José Lapetra; Guillermo Sáez; Emilio Ros Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2006-07-04 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: C Itsiopoulos; L Brazionis; M Kaimakamis; M Cameron; J D Best; K O'Dea; K Rowley Journal: Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2010-07-31 Impact factor: 4.222
Authors: Jaana Lindström; Pirjo Ilanne-Parikka; Markku Peltonen; Sirkka Aunola; Johan G Eriksson; Katri Hemiö; Helena Hämäläinen; Pirjo Härkönen; Sirkka Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi; Mauri Laakso; Anne Louheranta; Marjo Mannelin; Merja Paturi; Jouko Sundvall; Timo T Valle; Matti Uusitupa; Jaakko Tuomilehto Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-11-11 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: A Keys; A Menotti; M J Karvonen; C Aravanis; H Blackburn; R Buzina; B S Djordjevic; A S Dontas; F Fidanza; M H Keys Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1986-12 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Emilio Ros; Miguel A Martínez-González; Ramon Estruch; Jordi Salas-Salvadó; Montserrat Fitó; José A Martínez; Dolores Corella Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2014-05-14 Impact factor: 8.701
Authors: Bonnie J Brehm; Barbara L Lattin; Suzanne S Summer; Jane A Boback; Gina M Gilchrist; Ronald J Jandacek; David A D'Alessio Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-10-28 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Katherine Esposito; Maria Ida Maiorino; Giuseppe Bellastella; Demosthenes B Panagiotakos; Dario Giugliano Journal: Endocrine Date: 2016-07-09 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Katrina E Bach; Jaimon T Kelly; Suetonia C Palmer; Saman Khalesi; Giovanni F M Strippoli; Katrina L Campbell Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-09-24 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Robert E Heinl; Devinder S Dhindsa; Elliot N Mahlof; William M Schultz; Johnathan C Ricketts; Tina Varghese; Amirhossein Esmaeeli; Marc P Allard-Ratick; Anthony J Millard; Heval M Kelli; Pratik B Sandesara; Danny J Eapen; Laurence Sperling Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Melanie J Davies; David A D'Alessio; Judith Fradkin; Walter N Kernan; Chantal Mathieu; Geltrude Mingrone; Peter Rossing; Apostolos Tsapas; Deborah J Wexler; John B Buse Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 10.122