Dieter P Hoyer1, Anja Gallinat, Sandra Swoboda, Jeremias Wohlschlaeger, Ursula Rauen, Andreas Paul, Thomas Minor. 1. 1 Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Germany. 2 Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Essen, Germany. 3 Institute of Physiological Chemistry, University Hospital Essen, Germany. 4 Surgical Research Division, University Hospital Bonn, Germany. 5 Address correspondence to: Dieter P. Hoyer, M.D., University Hospital Essen, Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Hufelandstr. 55, 45127 Essen, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) for preservation led to compelling success for outcomes of renal transplantation. Application of different concentrations of oxygen during renal HMP has not been systematically analyzed. This study investigates the aspects of renal function and morphology in dependence of oxygen concentrations during HMP in a porcine donation after circulatory death model. METHODS: After 30 min of warm ischemia, porcine kidneys were randomly assigned to preservation for 21 hr by HMP without oxygenation (HMPnoox), oxygenated HMP with air (HMPair), or 100% oxygen (HMPox100%). Afterward, kidneys were reperfused for 2 hr in an ex vivo model for assessment of function and integrity. RESULTS: Application of HMPox100% led to significantly increased blood flow during reperfusion compared to HMPnoox. Preservation by HMPox100% led to a doubling of creatinine clearance after 90 and 120 min of reperfusion (13.4 and 12.0 mL/min) compared to preservation by HMPnoox (7.3 and 7.7 mL/min; P=0.01). Oxygenated HMP with air led to results between the two other groups. Fractional excretion of sodium demonstrated a strong tendency of higher values after HMPnoox compared to HMPox100% (P=0.096) and HMPair (P=0.09). Analysis of structural integrity during reperfusion demonstrated significantly higher values of lactate dehydrogenase resembling cell damage (P=0.02), higher values of gamma-glutamyl-transferase (gGT) resembling tubulus injury (P=0.048), and more pronounced tubular dilatation (P=0.02) after HMPnoox compared to HMPox100%. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates that application of HMPox100% for kidneys from donations after circulatory death results in better renal function during early reperfusion compared to HMPnoox.
BACKGROUND: Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) for preservation led to compelling success for outcomes of renal transplantation. Application of different concentrations of oxygen during renal HMP has not been systematically analyzed. This study investigates the aspects of renal function and morphology in dependence of oxygen concentrations during HMP in a porcine donation after circulatory death model. METHODS: After 30 min of warm ischemia, porcine kidneys were randomly assigned to preservation for 21 hr by HMP without oxygenation (HMPnoox), oxygenated HMP with air (HMPair), or 100% oxygen (HMPox100%). Afterward, kidneys were reperfused for 2 hr in an ex vivo model for assessment of function and integrity. RESULTS: Application of HMPox100% led to significantly increased blood flow during reperfusion compared to HMPnoox. Preservation by HMPox100% led to a doubling of creatinine clearance after 90 and 120 min of reperfusion (13.4 and 12.0 mL/min) compared to preservation by HMPnoox (7.3 and 7.7 mL/min; P=0.01). Oxygenated HMP with air led to results between the two other groups. Fractional excretion of sodium demonstrated a strong tendency of higher values after HMPnoox compared to HMPox100% (P=0.096) and HMPair (P=0.09). Analysis of structural integrity during reperfusion demonstrated significantly higher values of lactate dehydrogenase resembling cell damage (P=0.02), higher values of gamma-glutamyl-transferase (gGT) resembling tubulus injury (P=0.048), and more pronounced tubular dilatation (P=0.02) after HMPnoox compared to HMPox100%. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates that application of HMPox100% for kidneys from donations after circulatory death results in better renal function during early reperfusion compared to HMPnoox.
Authors: Matthew F Blum; Qiang Liu; Basem Soliman; Paul Dreher; Toshihiro Okamoto; Emilio D Poggio; David A Goldfarb; William M Baldwin; Cristiano Quintini Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2017-04-20 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: B Mesnard; A E Ogbemudia; G Karam; F Dengu; G Hackim; J Rigaud; G Blancho; S Drouin; M O Timsit; J Branchereau Journal: World J Urol Date: 2021-08-25 Impact factor: 3.661
Authors: Tom Darius; Martial Vergauwen; Matteo Mueller; Selda Aydin; Philipp Dutkowski; Pierre Gianello; Michel Mourad Journal: Transplant Direct Date: 2020-06-11
Authors: J Moritz Kaths; Juan Echeverri; Yi Min Chun; Jun Yu Cen; Nicolas Goldaracena; Ivan Linares; Luke S Dingwell; Paul M Yip; Rohan John; Darius Bagli; Istvan Mucsi; Anand Ghanekar; David R Grant; Lisa A Robinson; Markus Selzner Journal: Transplantation Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: J Moritz Kaths; Juan Echeverri; Nicolas Goldaracena; Kristine S Louis; Paul Yip; Rohan John; Istvan Mucsi; Anand Ghanekar; Darius Bagli; Markus Selzner; Lisa A Robinson Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2016-02-21 Impact factor: 1.355