| Literature DB >> 25368811 |
Mahmoud Helmy Belal1, Abdulaziz Yassin2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Dentin hypersensitivity is a potential threat to oral health. Laser irradiation may provide reliable and reproducible treatment but remains controversial. The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of CO2 or erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Er:YAG) laser therapy, and to assess mineral content.Entities:
Keywords: Dentin; Hypersensitivity; Laser; Minerals
Year: 2014 PMID: 25368811 PMCID: PMC4216399 DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2014.44.5.227
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Periodontal Implant Sci ISSN: 2093-2278 Impact factor: 2.614
Figure 1Scanning electron microscopy image of the root surfaces for the different experimental groups: (A-C) Group 1: control, clearly showed openings of the dentinal tubules with wide and funnel shaped orifices; (D and E) Group 2: the CO2 laser group, which generally showed a reduction in open dentinal tubules and reduced diameters when compared to the controls (×350 and ×700).
Figure 2Scanning electron microscopy image of the root surfaces of group 3, which was treated by erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser. Narrowing of the orifices and a reduction in open dentinal tubules (A and B) as well as melting of the tubule orifices (C and D) can be noted (×350 and ×700).
Comparison among the experimental groups, using an ANOVA test (Tukey post hoc test) for the difference in the degree of occlusion of a dentinal tubule.
ANOVA: analysis of variance, Group 1: control, Group 2: CO2 laser, Group 3: erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser, SD: standard deviation.
a)Statistically significant.
Figure 3Pie chart of the mean percentage of occluded tubules among the experimental groups. Er:YAG, erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser.
Comparison among the experimental groups, using an ANOVA test (Tukey post hoc test) for the weighted values (%) of the included elemental analysis.
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
ANOVA: analysis of variance, Group 1: control, Group 2: CO2 laser, Group 3: erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser, NS: not significant.
Comparison among the laser groups, using Student t-test for the effect of the mean temperature rise on the specimen's surface during laser irradiation.
SD: standard deviation, Group 2: CO2 laser, Group 3: erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser.
a)Statistically significant.