Literature DB >> 25368763

Early Vertebroplasty versus Delayed Vertebroplasty for Acute Osteoporotic Compression Fracture : Are the Results of the Two Surgical Strategies the Same?

Seong Son1, Sang-Gu Lee1, Woo-Kyung Kim1, Chan-Woo Park1, Chan-Jong Yoo1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In Korea, early vertebroplasty (EVP) or delayed vertebroplasty (DVP, which is performed at least 2 weeks after diagnosis) were performed for the treatment of acute osteoporotic compression fracture (OCF) of the spine. The present study compared the outcomes of two surgical strategies for the treatment of single-level acute OCF in the thoracolumbar junction (T12-L2).
METHODS: From 2004 to 2010, 23 patients were allocated to the EVP group (EVPG) and 27 patients to the DVP group (DVPG). Overall mean age was 68.3±7.9 and minimum follow-up period was 1.0 year. Retrospective study of clinical and radiological results was conducted.
RESULTS: No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed between the two groups. As expected, mean duration from onset to vertebroplasty and mean duration of hospital stay were significantly longer in the DVPG (17.1±2.1 and 17.5±4.2) than in the EVPG (3.8±3.3 and 10.8±5.1, p=0.001). Final clinical outcome including visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index, and Odom's criteria did not differ between the two groups. However, immediate improvement of the VAS after vertebroplasty was greater in the EVPG (5.1±1.3) than in the DVPG (4.0±1.0, p=0.002). The proportion of cement leakage was lower in the EVPG (30.4%) than in the DVPG (59.3%, p=0.039). In addition, semiquantitative grade of cement interdigitation was significantly more favorable in the EVPG than in the DVPG (p=0.003). Final vertebral body collapse and segmental kyphosis did not differ significantly between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that EVP achieves a better immediate surgical effect with more favorable cost-effectiveness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Compression fracture; Osteoporosis; Spine; Vertebroplasty

Year:  2014        PMID: 25368763      PMCID: PMC4217057          DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2014.56.3.211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc        ISSN: 1225-8245


  17 in total

1.  Pain relief following percutaneous vertebroplasty: results of a series of 283 consecutive patients treated in a single institution.

Authors:  Giovanni Carlo Anselmetti; Giovanni Corrao; Patrizia Della Monica; Vincenzo Tartaglia; Antonio Manca; Haris Eminefendic; Filippo Russo; Irene Tosetti; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Age-related changes in trabecular width and spacing in human iliac crest biopsies.

Authors:  R W Mellish; N J Garrahan; J E Compston
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1989-07

3.  Effects of bone cement volume and distribution on vertebral stiffness after vertebroplasty.

Authors:  M A Liebschner; W S Rosenberg; T M Keaveny
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Age of fracture and clinical outcomes of percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  T J Kaufmann; M E Jensen; P A Schweickert; W F Marx; D F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  The proper volume and distribution of cement augmentation on percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Dong Joon Kim; Tae Wan Kim; Kwan Ho Park; Moon Pyo Chi; Jae O Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-08-31

6.  A clinical comparative study on low versus medium viscosity polymethylmetacrylate bone cement in percutaneous vertebroplasty: viscosity associated with cement leakage.

Authors:  Marc J Nieuwenhuijse; Sander P J Muijs; Arian R van Erkel; Sander P D Dijkstra
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty: indications, contraindications, and technique.

Authors:  W C G Peh; L A Gilula
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty for pain relief and spinal stabilization.

Authors:  J D Barr; M S Barr; T J Lemley; R M McCann
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Predictors of outcomes of percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Luis Alvarez; Antonio Pérez-Higueras; Juan J Granizo; Ignacio de Miguel; Diana Quiñones; Roberto E Rossi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Vertebroplasty: cement leakage into the disc increases the risk of new fracture of adjacent vertebral body.

Authors:  Edward P Lin; Sven Ekholm; Akio Hiwatashi; Per-Lennart Westesson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  10 in total

1.  The safety and efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty for patients over 90 years old.

Authors:  Shunsuke Kamei; Tomoyuki Noguchi; Yoshitaka Shida; Takashi Okafuji; Kota Yokoyama; Fumiya Uchiyama; Hiroshi Nakatake; Tsuyoshi Tajima
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Radiologic Evaluation of Chronic Vertebral Compression Fractures and Role of Vertebral Augmentation.

Authors:  Jesse Hatgis; Ovidiu Palea; Yashar Ghomri; Michelle Granville; Aldo Berti; Robert E Jacobson
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-08-27

3.  Exploration of percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture as day surgery: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Boyuan Nie; Qingling Wang; Beilei Li; Ning Ou; Zhaohui Yang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Current status and challenges of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP).

Authors:  Tomoyuki Noguchi; Koji Yamashita; Ryotaro Kamei; Junki Maehara
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 2.701

5.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

Authors:  Rachelle Buchbinder; Renea V Johnston; Kobi J Rischin; Joanne Homik; C Allyson Jones; Kamran Golmohammadi; David F Kallmes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-11-06

Review 6.  Percutaneous cement augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Amer Sebaaly; Maroun Rizkallah; Falah Bachour; Firas Atallah; Pierre Emmanuel Moreau; Ghassan Maalouf
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-06-22

7.  Expression changes of IL-17 in zoledronic acid combined with PVP technology in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture and its predictive value of relapse.

Authors:  Linsong Lu; Yao Liu; Shaxika Nazierhan; Zhiguo Sun; Dilimulati Aikeremu; Wuqikun Alimasi; Kuo Xu; Waresijiang Niyazi; Hao Wang
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 2.041

8.  Safety and Efficacy of Bone Cement (Spinofill®) for Vertebroplasty in Patients with Osteoporotic Compression Fracture : A Preliminary Prospective Study.

Authors:  Han Byeol Park; Seong Son; Jong Myung Jung; Sang Gu Lee; Byung Rhae Yoo
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2022-05-17

Review 9.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

Authors:  Rachelle Buchbinder; Renea V Johnston; Kobi J Rischin; Joanne Homik; C Allyson Jones; Kamran Golmohammadi; David F Kallmes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-04

Review 10.  Vertebral Augmentation: State of the Art.

Authors:  Amer Sebaaly; Linda Nabhane; Fouad Issa El Khoury; Gaby Kreichati; Rami El Rachkidi
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-04-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.