| Literature DB >> 25368726 |
Gladys Ifesinachi Ahaneku1, Joseph Eberendu Ahaneku1, Charles Ukachukwu Osuji1, Celestine Ogonna Oguejiofor1, Patience Chioma Opara2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Demonstration of cardiovascular disease (CVD) markers in healthy subjects with normal blood chemistry tests underscores the need to study social determinants of risk factors to aid primary prevention worldwide; particularly in slums which harbor nearly 80% of rural to urban migrants in the epidemiologically transiting Africa where CVDs were previously unknown. The objective of this study was to assess lipids in relationship to alcohol consumption and BMI in a Nigerian slum.Entities:
Keywords: Body mass index (BMI); Lipid patterns; Nigerians; alcohol intake; slum
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25368726 PMCID: PMC4215365 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2014.18.37.1926
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pan Afr Med J
Mean parameter of Participants in relation to alcohol Consumption and BMI
| Alcohol drinkers | Non-alcohol drinkers | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal Range | Those with Normal BMI | All those with BMI ≥ 25Kg/M2 | Only those Overtly Obese | All Alcohol drinkers | Normal BMI | All those with BMI ≥ 25Kg/M2 | Overtly Obese | All Non-alcohol drinkers | |
|
| ≥ 18 | 46.29±1.65 n = 38 | 47.16± 1.24 n = 29 | 41.42± 1.06 n = 12 | 46.69± 1.47 n = 70 | 41.61± 1.84 n = 71 | 43.65± 1.42 n = 48 | 42.08±9.06 n = 12 | 42.43±1.68 n = 110 |
|
| 0.5-.71 | 1.24± 0.94 n = 37 | 1.25± 0.93 n = 29 | 1.54 ±1.18 n = 11 | 1.24± 0.93 n = 66 | 1.07± 0.78 n = 63 | 1.35± 1.84 n = 46 | 1.22 ± 0.79 n = 12 | 1.19± 0.81 n = 110 |
|
| 3.6-.17 | 4.17±1.68 n = 37 | 4.52±1.50 n = 29 | 4.85± 0.93 n = 11 | 4.32± 1.60 n = 66 | 4.50± 1.52 n = 63 | 4.90± 2.05 n = 46 | 5.54± 1.73 n = 12 | 4.67± 1.76 n = 110 |
|
| 1.96-3.28 | 3.38±1.71 n = 37 | 3.63± 1.48 n = 33 | 3.88±1.01 n = 11 | 3.49± 1.61 n = 66 | 3.72± 1.52 n = 63 | 3.93± 2.02 n = 46 | 4.78±1.69 n = 12 | 3.81±1.74 n = 110 |
|
| 1.04-1.55 | 0.58± 0.26 n = 37 | 0.63± 0.24 n = 29 | 0.65 ±0.28 n = 11 | 0.60± 0.25 n = 66 | 0.59± 0.21 n = 63 | 0.65± 0.28 n = 46 | 0.52 ± 0.20 n = 12 | 0.61± 0,24 n = 110 |
|
| <2.1 | 7.35± 5.11 n = 37 | 6.56± 3.88 n = 29 | 6.85±3.02 n = 11 | 7.00± 4.59 n = 66 | 7.06± 3.63 n = 63 | 7.37± 7.58 n = 46 | 12.03± 1.26 n = 12 | 7.19± 5.62 n = 110 |
|
| < 25 | 22.24± 2.27 n = 38 | 29.69± 6.25 n = 32 | 35.24± 7.35 n = 12 | 25.64± 5.86 n = 70 | 21.67± 2.28 n = 71 | 29.13± 3.78 n = 12 | 34.36±3.46 n = 12 | 24.75± 4.74 n = 121 |
P values: P values: Age = 0.699, TG = 0.193, TC = 0.232, LDLC = 0.724, HDLC. = 0.815, RPI = 0.080, BMI = 0.251. (Measures of association: age= 0.018, TG= 0.001, TC= 0.015, LDLC= 0.010, HDLC= 0.001, BMI= 0.007). TG= Triglycerides, TC= Total cholesterol, LDL= Low density lipoprotein, HDL= High density lipoprotein, RPI= Risk predictive index, BMI= Body mass index
Prevalence of dyslipidaemia in relation to alcohol consumption and BMI
| Alcohol Drinkers | Non-alcohol Drinkers | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Those with Normal BMI (A) | All those with Higher than normal BMI B) | Only those Overtly Obese (C) | All Alcohol drinkers (D) | Normal BMI (E) | Higher than normal BMI (F) | Overtly Obese (G) | All Non-alcohol drinkers (H) | |
| High TG | 24.3% n = 8 | 27.6% n = 8 | 36.4% n = 4 | 25.8% n = 17 | 12.7% n = 8 | 26.1% n = 12 | 16.7% n = 2 | 18.0% n = 20 |
| High TC | 27.0% n = 10 | 31.0% n = 9 | 36.4% n = 4 | 28.8% n = 19 | 31.7% n = 20 | 45.7% n = 21 | 58.3% n = 7 | 37.3% n = 41 |
| High LDLC | 51.4% n = 19 | 58.6% n = 17 | 72.3% n = 8 | 54.5% n = 36 | 55.6% n = 35 | 63.0% n = 29 | 83.3% n = 10 | 59.1% n = 65 |
| Low HDL | 97.3% n = 1 | 93.1% n = 27 | 90.9% n = 10 | 95.5% n = 63 | 95.2% n = 27 | 93.5% n = 43 | 100% n = 0 | 94.5% n = 103 |
P values: Alcohol drinkers: (High TG: 0.491, High TC: 0.463, High LDL C: 0.368, Low HDLD: 0.408); Non-alcohol drinkers: (High TG: 0. 0.063, High TC: 0.100, High LDL C: 0.279, Low HDLC: 0.064); Raised TG, TC or LDLC = hyperlipidemias; High TC/LDLC and/ or High TG + low HDLC level = combined dyslipidemia