Literature DB >> 25368263

Significance of self-reported symptoms as part of follow-up routines in patients treated for oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Ulf Zätterström1, Morten Boysen2, Jan Folkvard Evensen3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is little evidence to prove that frequent out-patient consultations lead to better prognosis in patients treated for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Furthermore, there is no consensus regarding the timing and number of follow-up consultations or the duration of monitoring after completed therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively recorded demographic and clinical data of 537 patients treated over a period of 15 years with complete follow-up of 18 years in a tertiary academic Center.
RESULTS: Out of 537 patients considered free of disease after treatment, 196 (36%) developed recurrent disease during follow-up. Self-reported symptoms led to diagnosis of the recurrence in 78% of the cases. Only 22% of recurrences were detected through physical examination of asymptomatic patients. There was no difference in disease-free survival in-between these two groups.
CONCLUSION: Follow-up routines are indispensable as part of cancer treatment but can be more cost-efficient when patients are educated and encouraged to report subjective symptoms. Trained personnel in collaboration with head and neck specialists can handle parts of follow-up routines. Copyright
© 2014 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Head and neck; carcinoma; histopathology; radiotherapy; recurrence; second malignancy tumours; surgery; surveillance; survival; treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25368263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  3 in total

Review 1.  Follow-Up of Head and Neck Cancer Survivors: Tipping the Balance of Intensity.

Authors:  Petr Szturz; Carl Van Laer; Christian Simon; Dirk Van Gestel; Jean Bourhis; Jan B Vermorken
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 2.  Follow-up in Head and Neck Cancer: Do More Does It Mean Do Better? A Systematic Review and Our Proposal Based on Our Experience.

Authors:  Nerina Denaro; Marco Carlo Merlano; Elvio Grazioso Russi
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 3.372

3.  Case study of the integration of electronic patient-reported outcomes as standard of care in a head and neck oncology practice: Obstacles and opportunities.

Authors:  Olga Strachna; Marc A Cohen; Monica M Allison; David G Pfister; Nancy Y Lee; Richard J Wong; Sean M McBride; Raia R Mohammed; Elizabeth Kemeny; Fernanda C G Polubriaginof; Alyse Kassa; Michael Hannon; Jennifer R Cracchiolo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 6.860

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.