Literature DB >> 25368210

Normal values and clinical relevance of left atrial myocardial function analysed by speckle-tracking echocardiography: multicentre study.

Daniel A Morris1, Masaaki Takeuchi2, Maximilian Krisper3, Clemens Köhncke3, Tarek Bekfani3, Tim Carstensen3, Sabine Hassfeld3, Marc Dorenkamp3, Kyoko Otani2, Kiyohiro Takigiku4, Chisato Izumi5, Satoshi Yuda6, Konomi Sakata7, Nobuyuki Ohte8, Kazuaki Tanabe9, Engin Osmanoglou10, York Kühnle3, Hans-Dirk Düngen3, Satoshi Nakatani11, Yutaka Otsuji2, Wilhelm Haverkamp3, Leif-Hendrik Boldt3.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aim of this multicentre study was to determine the normal range and the clinical relevance of the myocardial function of the left atrium (LA) analysed by 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography (2DSTE). METHODS AND
RESULTS: We analysed 329 healthy adult subjects prospectively included in 10 centres and a validation group of 377 patients with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD). LA myocardial function was analysed by LA strain rate peak during LA contraction (LA-SRa) and LA strain peak during LA relaxation (LA-Strain). The range of values of LA myocardial function in healthy subjects was LA-SRa -2.11 ± 0.61 s(-1) and LA-Strain 45.5 ± 11.4%, and the lowest expected values of these LA analyses (calculated as -1.96 SD from the mean of healthy subjects) were LA-SRa -0.91 s(-1) and LA-Strain 23.1%. Concerning the clinical relevance of these LA myocardial analyses, LA-SRa and LA-Strain detected subtle LA dysfunction in patients with LVDD, even though LA volumetric measurements were normal. In addition, in these patients we found that the functional class (dyspnoea-NYHA classification) was inversely related to both LA-Strain and LA-SRa.
CONCLUSION: In the present multicentre study analysing a large cohort of healthy subjects and patients with LVDD, the normal range and the clinical relevance of the myocardial function of the LA using 2DSTE have been determined. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2014. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Echocardiography; Left atrial; Speckle tracking; Strain

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25368210     DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 2047-2404            Impact factor:   6.875


  48 in total

1.  Left atrial strain in the assessment of diastolic function: providing new insights into primary myocardial dysfunction in Marfan syndrome.

Authors:  Eusebio García-Izquierdo; Vanessa Moñivas-Palomero; Alberto Forteza; Carlos Martín-López; Mario Torres-Sanabria; Xabier Cia-Mendioroz; Consuelo Olivo-Rodríguez; Sara Navarro-Rico; Andrés Sánchez-Gómez; Jesús G Mirelis; Miguel A Cavero; Susana Mingo-Santos
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Early detection of cardiac alterations by left atrial strain in patients with risk for cardiac abnormalities with preserved left ventricular systolic and diastolic function.

Authors:  Kerstin Braunauer; Elisabeth Pieske-Kraigher; Evgeny Belyavskiy; Radhakrishnan Aravind-Kumar; Martin Kropf; Robin Kraft; Athanasios Frydas; Esteban Marquez; Engin Osmanoglou; Carsten Tschöpe; Frank Edelmann; Burkert Pieske; Hans-Dirk Düngen; Daniel A Morris
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Structural and functional cardiac analyses using modern and sensitive myocardial techniques in adult Pompe disease.

Authors:  Daniel A Morris; Daniela Blaschke; Alice Krebs; Sima Canaan-Kühl; Ursula Plöckinger; Gesine Knobloch; Thula C Walter; York Kühnle; Leif-Hendrik Boldt; Elisabeth Kraigher-Krainer; Burkert Pieske; Wilhelm Haverkamp
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Left Atrial Strain Impairment Precedes Geometric Remodeling as a Marker of Post-Myocardial Infarction Diastolic Dysfunction.

Authors:  Jiwon Kim; Brian Yum; Maria C Palumbo; Razia Sultana; Nathaniel Wright; Mukund Das; Cindy You; Chaya S Moskowitz; Robert A Levine; Richard B Devereux; Jonathan W Weinsaft
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-08-19

Review 5.  Left atrial function: evaluation by strain analysis.

Authors:  Gary C H Gan; Aaisha Ferkh; Anita Boyd; Liza Thomas
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-02

Review 6.  Adult echocardiographic nomograms: overview, critical review and creation of a software for automatic, fast and easy calculation of normal values.

Authors:  Massimiliano Cantinotti; Raffaele Giordano; Marco Paterni; Daniel Saura; Marco Scalese; Eliana Franchi; Nadia Assanta; Martin Koestenberg; Raluca Dulgheru; Tadafumi Sugimoto; Anne Bernard; Luis Caballero; Patrizio Lancellotti
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  LA Strain for Categorization of LV Diastolic Dysfunction.

Authors:  Amita Singh; Karima Addetia; Francesco Maffessanti; Victor Mor-Avi; Roberto M Lang
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-12-21

8.  Left atrial mechanics strongly predict functional capacity assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing in subjects without structural heart disease.

Authors:  Luís Leite; Sofia Lázaro Mendes; Rui Baptista; Rogério Teixeira; Manuel Oliveira-Santos; Nelson Ribeiro; Rosa Coutinho; Victor Monteiro; Rui Martins; Graça Castro; Maria João Ferreira; Mariano Pego
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 9.  Contemporary narrative review on left atrial strain mechanics in echocardiography: cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease and beyond.

Authors:  Vardhmaan Jain; Raktim Ghosh; Manasvi Gupta; Yoshihito Saijo; Agam Bansal; Medhat Farwati; Rachel Marcus; Allan Klein; Bo Xu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

Review 10.  Clinical implications of left atrial function assessed by speckle tracking echocardiography.

Authors:  Satoshi Yuda; Atsuko Muranaka; Tetsuji Miura
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2016-03-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.