Literature DB >> 25367904

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis for efficacy of ceftaroline fosamil in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.

Sujata M Bhavnani1, Jeffrey P Hammel2, Scott A Van Wart2, Christopher M Rubino2, Daniel K Reynolds2, Alan Forrest2, George L Drusano3, Tatiana Khariton4, H David Friedland5, Todd A Riccobene4, Paul G Ambrose2.   

Abstract

Ceftaroline is a cephalosporin with broad-spectrum in vitro activity against pathogens commonly associated with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Ceftaroline fosamil, the prodrug of ceftaroline, is approved for the treatment of patients with ABSSSI. Using data from the microbiologically evaluable population from two phase 2 and two phase 3 randomized, multicenter, double-blind studies of patients with ABSSSI, an analysis examining the relationship between drug exposure, as measured by the percentage of time during the dosing interval that free-drug steady-state concentrations remain above the MIC (f%T>MIC), and clinical and microbiological responses was undertaken. The analysis population included 526 patients, of whom 423 had infections associated with S. aureus. Clinical and microbiological success percentages were 94.7 and 94.5%, respectively, among all of the patients and 95.3 and 95.7%, respectively, among those with S. aureus infections. Univariable analysis based on data from all of the patients and those with S. aureus infections demonstrated significant relationships between f%T>MIC and microbiological response (P < 0.001 and P = 0.026, respectively). Multivariable logistic regression analyses demonstrated other patient factors in addition to f%T>MIC to be significant predictors of microbiological response, including age and infection type for all of the patients evaluated and age, infection type, and the presence of diabetes mellitus for patients with S. aureus infections. Results of these analyses confirm that a ceftaroline fosamil dosing regimen of 600 mg every 12 h provides exposures associated with the upper plateau of the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship for efficacy.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25367904      PMCID: PMC4291374          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02531-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  16 in total

1.  A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. 1916.

Authors:  D Du Bois; E F Du Bois
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.008

2.  CANVAS 1 and 2: analysis of clinical response at day 3 in two phase 3 trials of ceftaroline fosamil versus vancomycin plus aztreonam in treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.

Authors:  H David Friedland; Tanya O'Neal; Donald Biek; Paul B Eckburg; Douglas R Rank; Lily Llorens; Alex Smith; Gary W Witherell; Joseph B Laudano; Dirk Thye
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Pharmacodynamics of a new cephalosporin, PPI-0903 (TAK-599), active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in murine thigh and lung infection models: identification of an in vivo pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target.

Authors:  D Andes; W A Craig
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  The role of diabetes mellitus in the treatment of skin and skin structure infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: results from three randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Benjamin A Lipsky; Kamal M F Itani; John A Weigelt; Warren Joseph; Christopher M Paap; Arlene Reisman; Daniela E Myers; David B Huang
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  CANVAS 2: the second Phase III, randomized, double-blind study evaluating ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections.

Authors:  Mark H Wilcox; G Ralph Corey; George H Talbot; Dirk Thye; David Friedland; Tanya Baculik
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  CANVAS 1: the first Phase III, randomized, double-blind study evaluating ceftaroline fosamil for the treatment of patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections.

Authors:  G Ralph Corey; Mark H Wilcox; George H Talbot; Dirk Thye; David Friedland; Tanya Baculik
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Integrated analysis of CANVAS 1 and 2: phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ceftaroline versus vancomycin plus aztreonam in complicated skin and skin-structure infection.

Authors:  G Ralph Corey; Mark Wilcox; George H Talbot; H David Friedland; Tanya Baculik; Gary W Witherell; Ian Critchley; Anita F Das; Dirk Thye
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 8.  Background and rationale for revised clinical and laboratory standards institute interpretive criteria (Breakpoints) for Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: I. Cephalosporins and Aztreonam.

Authors:  Michael N Dudley; Paul G Ambrose; Sujata M Bhavnani; William A Craig; Mary Jane Ferraro; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Phase 2 study of ceftaroline versus standard therapy in treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections.

Authors:  George H Talbot; Dirk Thye; Anita Das; Yigong Ge
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Application of patient population-derived pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships to tigecycline breakpoint determination for staphylococci and streptococci.

Authors:  Paul G Ambrose; Alison K Meagher; Julie A Passarell; Scott A Van Wart; Brenda B Cirincione; Sujata M Bhavnani; Evelyn Ellis-Grosse
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.803

View more
  9 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analyses for efficacy of ceftaroline fosamil in patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.

Authors:  Sujata M Bhavnani; Jeffrey P Hammel; Scott A Van Wart; Christopher M Rubino; Daniel K Reynolds; Alan Forrest; Tatiana Khariton; H David Friedland; Todd A Riccobene; Paul G Ambrose
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Efficacy of Ceftaroline against Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Exhibiting the Cefazolin High-Inoculum Effect in a Rat Model of Endocarditis.

Authors:  Kavindra V Singh; Truc T Tran; Esteban C Nannini; Vincent H Tam; Cesar A Arias; Barbara E Murray
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Pharmacokinetics of ceftaroline in normal body weight and obese (classes I, II, and III) healthy adult subjects.

Authors:  Julie Ann Justo; Stockton M Mayer; Manjunath P Pai; Melinda M Soriano; Larry H Danziger; Richard M Novak; Keith A Rodvold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  A critical review on the clinical pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical trials of ceftaroline.

Authors:  Tony K L Kiang; Kyle J Wilby; Mary H H Ensom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  Ceftaroline Fosamil: A Review in Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections and Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Principles of Anti-infective Dosing.

Authors:  Nikolas J Onufrak; Alan Forrest; Daniel Gonzalez
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.393

7.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target attainment analyses to evaluate in vitro susceptibility test interpretive criteria for ceftaroline against Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  Scott A Van Wart; Paul G Ambrose; Christopher M Rubino; Tatiana Khariton; Todd A Riccobene; H David Friedland; Ian A Critchley; Sujata M Bhavnani
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Pharmacodynamic Thresholds for Beta-Lactam Antibiotics: A Story of Mouse Versus Man.

Authors:  Angela V Berry; Joseph L Kuti
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  Pharmacodynamic comparison of different antimicrobial regimens against Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections with elevated vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration.

Authors:  Thaina Miranda da Costa; Gabriel Trova Cuba; Priscylla Guimarães Migueres Morgado; David P Nicolau; Simone Aranha Nouér; Kátia Regina Netto Dos Santos; Carlos Roberto Veiga Kiffer
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.090

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.