PURPOSE: To report the reproducibility, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of home monitoring for disease activity in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (ARMD). METHODS: Participants were trained to complete three separate home monitoring tasks, designed to identify subtle changes in visual function that may indicate increasing neovascular ARMD disease activity. These included measurement of near acuity and assessments of environmental distortion and overall visual function. The need for repeat intra-vitreal injection, as predicted by home monitoring, was compared to standard clinical assessment involving ETDRS distance acuity, slit lamp examination, and spectral domain ocular coherence tomography. RESULTS: Although all participants were able to complete the home monitoring tasks, the reproducibility of each of the three tasks was modest. Cohen's kappa was 0.118 (p = 0.54) for the comparison of the outcome of the home monitoring exercise with the gold standard of hospital assessment to determine disease activity. The sensitivity of the home monitoring exercise was 33.3 % (95 % CI 15.2-51.4) and the specificity was 77.8 % (95 % CI 61.8-93.8). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that current tests of visual function, which are readily completed at home, cannot replace traditional clinic-based assessments for neovascular ARMD disease activity. Instead, such tests are likely to remain complementary to standard assessment in clinic.
PURPOSE: To report the reproducibility, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of home monitoring for disease activity in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (ARMD). METHODS:Participants were trained to complete three separate home monitoring tasks, designed to identify subtle changes in visual function that may indicate increasing neovascular ARMD disease activity. These included measurement of near acuity and assessments of environmental distortion and overall visual function. The need for repeat intra-vitreal injection, as predicted by home monitoring, was compared to standard clinical assessment involving ETDRS distance acuity, slit lamp examination, and spectral domain ocular coherence tomography. RESULTS: Although all participants were able to complete the home monitoring tasks, the reproducibility of each of the three tasks was modest. Cohen's kappa was 0.118 (p = 0.54) for the comparison of the outcome of the home monitoring exercise with the gold standard of hospital assessment to determine disease activity. The sensitivity of the home monitoring exercise was 33.3 % (95 % CI 15.2-51.4) and the specificity was 77.8 % (95 % CI 61.8-93.8). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that current tests of visual function, which are readily completed at home, cannot replace traditional clinic-based assessments for neovascular ARMD disease activity. Instead, such tests are likely to remain complementary to standard assessment in clinic.
Authors: Giuseppe Querques; Lea Querques; Omer Rafaeli; Florence Canoui-Poitrine; Francesco Bandello; Eric H Souied Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-09-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: P Mitchell; J-F Korobelnik; P Lanzetta; F G Holz; C Prünte; U Schmidt-Erfurth; Y Tano; S Wolf Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2009-05-13 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Geeta A Lalwani; Philip J Rosenfeld; Anne E Fung; Sander R Dubovy; Stephen Michels; William Feuer; Janet L Davis; Harry W Flynn; Maria Esquiabro Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2009-04-18 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Usha Chakravarthy; Simon P Harding; Chris A Rogers; Susan M Downes; Andrew J Lotery; Sarah Wordsworth; Barnaby C Reeves Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-05-11 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Richard P Gale; Sajjad Mahmood; Helen Devonport; Praveen J Patel; Adam H Ross; Gavin Walters; Louise Downey; Samer El-Sherbiny; Mary Freeman; Simon Berry; Nitin Jain Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 3.775