| Literature DB >> 25367582 |
Kyongsong Kim1, Toyohiko Isu, Daijiro Morimoto, Toru Sasamori, Atsushi Sugawara, Yasuhiro Chiba, Masahiro Isobe, Shiro Kobayashi, Akio Morita.
Abstract
Tarsal tunnel syndrome (TTS) is an entrapment neuropathy of the posterior tibial nerve and its branches in the tarsal tunnel. We present our less invasive surgical treatment of TTS in 69 patients (116 feet) and their clinical outcomes. The mean follow-up period was 64.6 months. With the patient under local anesthesia we use a microscope to perform sharp dissection of the flexor retinaculum and remove the connective tissues surrounding the posterior tibial nerve and vessels. To prevent postoperative adhesion and delayed neuropathy, decompression is performed to achieve symptom improvement without excessive dissection. Decompression is considered complete when the patient reports intraoperative symptom abatement and arterial pulsation is sufficient. The sensation of numbness and/or pain and of foreign substance adhesion was reduced in 92% and 95% of our patients, respectively. In self-assessments, 47 patients (68%) reported the treatment outcome as satisfactory, 15 (22%) as acceptable, and 7 (10%) were dissatisfied. Of 116 feet, 4 (3%) required re-operation, initial decompression was insufficient in 2 feet and further decompression was performed; in the other 2 feet improvement was achieved by decompression of the distal tarsal tunnel. Our surgical method involves neurovascular bundle decompression to obtain sufficient arterial pulsation. As we use local anesthesia, we can confirm symptom improvement intraoperatively, thereby avoiding unnecessary excessive dissection. Our method is simple, safe, and without detailed nerve dissection and it prevents postoperative adhesion.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25367582 PMCID: PMC4533351 DOI: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2014-0090
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) ISSN: 0470-8105 Impact factor: 1.742
Symptoms of tarsal tunnel syndrome and postoperative changes (116 feet)
| Symptoms | Beforesurgery | After surgery | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disappeared | Reduced | Nochange | ||
| Numbness | 106 (91%) | 33 (31%) | 65 (61%) | 8 (8%) |
| Foreign-bodysensation | 79 (68%) | 26 (33%) | 49 (62%) | 4 (5%) |
| Coldsensation | 57 (49%) | 24 (42%) | 24 (42%) | 9 (16%) |
| Burningsensation | 54 (47%) | 19 (35%) | 32 (59%) | 3 (6%) |
Fig. 1.A 3–4 cm bow-like skin incision is made 1.5 cm below the medial malleolus over the point of the Tinel-like sign.
Fig. 2.A: Under a microscope the flexor retinaculum is dissected sharply from the proximal end of the tarsal tunnel to its distal end. B: Dissection of the flexor retinaculum may be insufficient for symptom relief and arterial pulsation. C: When necessary, for sufficient decompression, we remove more connective tissues surrounding the posterior tibial nerve and vessels. To protect important structures we do not completely remove fat tissue surrounding the tibial nerve and vessels.
Surgical procedures to treat idiopathic tarsal tunnel syndrome and treatment outcomes
| Surgical procedure | Cases | F/U (months) | Effectiveness (%) | Complications |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Only tarsal tunnel opening
[ | 28 | N/L | N/L | N/L |
| PTN direct decompression
[ | 10 | N/L | E 80, G 10, F 10 | N/L |
| PTN direct decompression
[ | 32 (feet) | 31 | E 16, G 28, F 19, P 38 | 13% wound infection |
| PTN direct decompression
[ | 18 | 8 | E 72, G 2, P 6 | N/L |
| Resection of vessels
[ | 24 | 24 | G 50, F 29, P 21 | None |
| Insertion of fat tissue betweenPTN and vessels
[ | 9 | 27 | E 55, G 36, F 9 | None |
| Our procedure | 69 | 65 | Sa 68, Ac 22, Dissa 10 | None |
Ac: acceptable, Dissa: dissatisfied, E: excellent, F: fair, F/U: follow-up periods, G: good, N/L: not listed, P: poor, PTN: posterior tibial nerve, Sa: satisfied with the results.