Literature DB >> 25367437

Conflict acts as an implicit cost in reinforcement learning.

James F Cavanagh1, Sean E Masters2, Kevin Bath3, Michael J Frank4.   

Abstract

Conflict has been proposed to act as a cost in action selection, implying a general function of medio-frontal cortex in the adaptation to aversive events. Here we investigate if response conflict acts as a cost during reinforcement learning by modulating experienced reward values in cortical and striatal systems. Electroencephalography recordings show that conflict diminishes the relationship between reward-related frontal theta power and cue preference yet it enhances the relationship between punishment and cue avoidance. Individual differences in the cost of conflict on reward versus punishment sensitivity are also related to a genetic polymorphism associated with striatal D1 versus D2 pathway balance (DARPP-32). We manipulate these patterns with the D2 agent cabergoline, which induces a strong bias to amplify the aversive value of punishment outcomes following conflict. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that interactive cortico-striatal systems implicitly modulate experienced reward and punishment values as a function of conflict.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25367437     DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


  26 in total

1.  Effects of meditation practice on spontaneous eyeblink rate.

Authors:  Ayla Kruis; Heleen A Slagter; David R W Bachhuber; Richard J Davidson; Antoine Lutz
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and the value of control.

Authors:  Amitai Shenhav; Jonathan D Cohen; Matthew M Botvinick
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Interactions Among Working Memory, Reinforcement Learning, and Effort in Value-Based Choice: A New Paradigm and Selective Deficits in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Anne G E Collins; Matthew A Albrecht; James A Waltz; James M Gold; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  Dopamine D2 agonist affects visuospatial working memory distractor interference depending on individual differences in baseline working memory span.

Authors:  James M Broadway; Michael J Frank; James F Cavanagh
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Examining the link between reward and response inhibition in individuals with substance abuse tendencies.

Authors:  Kaileigh A Byrne; Darrell A Worthy
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Cognitive states influence dopamine-driven aberrant learning in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  James F Cavanagh; Andrea A Mueller; Darin R Brown; Jacqueline R Janowich; Jacqueline H Story-Remer; Ashley Wegele; Sarah Pirio Richardson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 7.  Filling the gaps: Cognitive control as a critical lens for understanding mechanisms of value-based decision-making.

Authors:  R Frömer; A Shenhav
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Dopaminergic modulation of the exploration/exploitation trade-off in human decision-making.

Authors:  Karima Chakroun; David Mathar; Antonius Wiehler; Florian Ganzer; Jan Peters
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 9.  Dopamine Does Double Duty in Motivating Cognitive Effort.

Authors:  Andrew Westbrook; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Frontal theta accounts for individual differences in the cost of conflict on decision making.

Authors:  John F L Pinner; James F Cavanagh
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.