Literature DB >> 25367436

Simple vs complex congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructions: etiology, management and outcomes.

Mohammad Javed Ali1, Saurabh Kamal, Adit Gupta, Mohammad Hasnat Ali, Milind N Naik.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to report the comparative clinical profiles and outcomes of simple and complex congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO).
METHODS: The study was a retrospective chart review of all patients presenting with CNLDO from a single surgeon's (M.J.A.) database. All patients underwent irrigation and probing under nasal endoscopic guidance. A detailed lacrimal system evaluation was performed, intraoperative findings including nasal endoscopy were documented, and etiologies of complex CNLDO were noted. Outcome measures were comparative profiles, and anatomical success and functional success of the interventions. Statistical analyses were performed using the Shapiro-Wilk test, Fisher's exact test, and Wilcoxon rank sum test.
RESULTS: Ninety-five eyes of 81 patients with simple CNLDO and 100 eyes of 83 patients with complex CNLDO were compared. The mean age at presentation was 17.6 months in simple CNLDO and 45.6 months in complex cases (p < 0.001). Epiphora and discharge were the most common symptoms; 89.4% among simple cases and 92% in the complex group. The most common causes of complex CNLDO were bony obstructions (23%), craniofacial syndromes (12%), and buried probe (10%). At a mean follow-up of 5.85 months for simple CNLDO and 4.68 months for complex CNLDO, anatomical success and functional success was noted in 97.8% and 94.7%, respectively, in simple CNLDO, and in 58% and 51%, respectively, in complex CNDLO (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Bony obstruction, craniofacial syndrome, and buried probe were the most common reasons for a complex CNLDO, noted commonly in older children, with irrigation and probing having much poorer outcomes when compared with simpler obstructions.
© 2014 ARS-AAOA, LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CNLDO; buried probe; complex; congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction; simple

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25367436     DOI: 10.1002/alr.21435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol        ISSN: 2042-6976            Impact factor:   3.858


  6 in total

1.  Clinical Outcome of Probing in Infants with Acute Dacryocystitis - A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Bhawesh Chandra Saha; Rashmi Kumari; Bibhuti Prasanna Sinha
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-08-01

2.  Outcome of monocanalicular intubation for complex congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: the role of age.

Authors:  Bahram Eshraghi; Hadi Ghadimi; Safoora Karami; Mojgan Nikdel
Journal:  Rom J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar

3.  Lacrimal drainage anomalies in congenital rubella syndrome.

Authors:  Shweta Gupta; Mohammad Javed Ali; Milind N Naik
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-09

4.  Nasal endoscopic features and outcomes of nasal endoscopy guided bicanalicular intubation for complex persistent congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructions.

Authors:  Manpreet Singh; Manjula Sharma; Manpreet Kaur; Aditi Mehta Grewal; Deepti Yadav; Sabia Handa; Sonam Yangzes; Zoramthara Zadeng; Pankaj Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  Dacryoendoscopy-assisted incision of Hasner's valve under nasoendoscopy for membranous congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction after probing failure: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Yue Li; Min Wei; Xueru Liu; Leilei Zhang; Xuefei Song; Caiwen Xiao
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 2.209

6.  Monocanalicular Intubation in Children with Incomplete Complex Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Older Than Five Years of Age.

Authors:  Bahram Eshraghi; Mansooreh Jamshidian Tehrani; Fereshteh Tayebi; Bita Momenaei
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.