PURPOSE: Here, we studied whether amplicon next-generation deep sequencing (NGS) could improve the detection of emerging BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutations in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients under tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment and discussed the clinical relevance of such sensitive mutational detection. METHODS: For NGS data evaluation including extraction of biologically relevant low-level variants from background error noise, we established and applied a robust and versatile bioinformatics approach. RESULTS: Results from a retrospective longitudinal analysis of 135 samples of 15 CML patients showed that NGS could have revealed emerging resistant mutants 2-11 months earlier than conventional sequencing. Interestingly, in cases who later failed first-line imatinib treatment, NGS revealed that TKI-resistant mutations were already detectable at the time of major or deeper molecular response. Identification of emerging mutations by NGS was mirrored by BCR-ABL1 transcript level expressed either fluctuations around 0.1 %(IS) or by slight transcript level increase. NGS also allowed tracing mutations that emerged during second-line TKI therapy back to the time of switchover. Compound mutants could be detected in three cases, but were not found to outcompete single mutants. CONCLUSIONS: This work points out, that next-generation deep sequencing, coupled with a robust bioinformatics approach for mutation calling, may be just in place to ensure reliable detection of emerging BCR-ABL1 mutations, allowing early therapy switch and selection of the most appropriate therapy. Further, prospective assessment of how to best integrate NGS in the molecular monitoring and clinical decision algorithms is warranted.
PURPOSE: Here, we studied whether amplicon next-generation deep sequencing (NGS) could improve the detection of emerging BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutations in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients under tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment and discussed the clinical relevance of such sensitive mutational detection. METHODS: For NGS data evaluation including extraction of biologically relevant low-level variants from background error noise, we established and applied a robust and versatile bioinformatics approach. RESULTS: Results from a retrospective longitudinal analysis of 135 samples of 15 CMLpatients showed that NGS could have revealed emerging resistant mutants 2-11 months earlier than conventional sequencing. Interestingly, in cases who later failed first-line imatinib treatment, NGS revealed that TKI-resistant mutations were already detectable at the time of major or deeper molecular response. Identification of emerging mutations by NGS was mirrored by BCR-ABL1 transcript level expressed either fluctuations around 0.1 %(IS) or by slight transcript level increase. NGS also allowed tracing mutations that emerged during second-line TKI therapy back to the time of switchover. Compound mutants could be detected in three cases, but were not found to outcompete single mutants. CONCLUSIONS: This work points out, that next-generation deep sequencing, coupled with a robust bioinformatics approach for mutation calling, may be just in place to ensure reliable detection of emerging BCR-ABL1 mutations, allowing early therapy switch and selection of the most appropriate therapy. Further, prospective assessment of how to best integrate NGS in the molecular monitoring and clinical decision algorithms is warranted.
Authors: Michael W Schmitt; Scott R Kennedy; Jesse J Salk; Edward J Fox; Joseph B Hiatt; Lawrence A Loeb Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-08-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Matthew S Zabriskie; Christopher A Eide; Srinivas K Tantravahi; Nadeem A Vellore; Johanna Estrada; Franck E Nicolini; Hanna J Khoury; Richard A Larson; Marina Konopleva; Jorge E Cortes; Hagop Kantarjian; Elias J Jabbour; Steven M Kornblau; Jeffrey H Lipton; Delphine Rea; Leif Stenke; Gisela Barbany; Thoralf Lange; Juan-Carlos Hernández-Boluda; Gert J Ossenkoppele; Richard D Press; Charles Chuah; Stuart L Goldberg; Meir Wetzler; Francois-Xavier Mahon; Gabriel Etienne; Michele Baccarani; Simona Soverini; Gianantonio Rosti; Philippe Rousselot; Ran Friedman; Marie Deininger; Kimberly R Reynolds; William L Heaton; Anna M Eiring; Anthony D Pomicter; Jamshid S Khorashad; Todd W Kelley; Riccardo Baron; Brian J Druker; Michael W Deininger; Thomas O'Hare Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2014-08-14 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Jamshid S Khorashad; Hugues de Lavallade; Jane F Apperley; Dragana Milojkovic; Alistair G Reid; Marco Bua; Richard Szydlo; Eduardo Olavarria; Jaspal Kaeda; John M Goldman; David Marin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-07-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Peter J Campbell; Erin D Pleasance; Philip J Stephens; Ed Dicks; Richard Rance; Ian Goodhead; George A Follows; Anthony R Green; P Andy Futreal; Michael R Stratton Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-08-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Wendy T Parker; Rebecca M Lawrence; Musei Ho; Darryl L Irwin; Hamish S Scott; Timothy P Hughes; Susan Branford Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-10-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michele Baccarani; Michael W Deininger; Gianantonio Rosti; Andreas Hochhaus; Simona Soverini; Jane F Apperley; Francisco Cervantes; Richard E Clark; Jorge E Cortes; François Guilhot; Henrik Hjorth-Hansen; Timothy P Hughes; Hagop M Kantarjian; Dong-Wook Kim; Richard A Larson; Jeffrey H Lipton; François-Xavier Mahon; Giovanni Martinelli; Jiri Mayer; Martin C Müller; Dietger Niederwieser; Fabrizio Pane; Jerald P Radich; Philippe Rousselot; Giuseppe Saglio; Susanne Saußele; Charles Schiffer; Richard Silver; Bengt Simonsson; Juan-Luis Steegmann; John M Goldman; Rüdiger Hehlmann Journal: Blood Date: 2013-06-26 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: R de Cássia Viu Carrara; A M Fontes; K J Abraham; M D Orellana; S K Haddad; P V B Palma; R A Panepucci; M A Zago; D T Covas Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2017-09-13 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Angela Proctor; Imola G Zigoneanu; Qunzhao Wang; Christopher E Sims; David S Lawrence; Nancy L Allbritton Journal: Analyst Date: 2016-10-17 Impact factor: 4.616
Authors: Vaclava Polivkova; Peter Rohon; Hana Klamova; Olga Cerna; Martina Divoka; Nikola Curik; Jan Zach; Martin Novak; Iuri Marinov; Simona Soverini; Edgar Faber; Katerina Machova Polakova Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 3.240