Literature DB >> 25367012

Use of diabetes data management software reports by health care providers, patients with diabetes, and caregivers improves accuracy and efficiency of data analysis and interpretation compared with traditional logbook data: first results of the Accu-Chek Connect Reports Utility and Efficiency Study (ACCRUES).

Deborah A Hinnen1, Ann Buskirk2, Maureen Lyden3, Linda Amstutz2, Tracy Hunter2, Christopher G Parkin4, Robin Wagner2.   

Abstract

We assessed users' proficiency and efficiency in identifying and interpreting self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG), insulin, and carbohydrate intake data using data management software reports compared with standard logbooks. This prospective, self-controlled, randomized study enrolled insulin-treated patients with diabetes (PWDs) (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [CSII] and multiple daily insulin injection [MDI] therapy), patient caregivers [CGVs]) and health care providers (HCPs) who were naïve to diabetes data management computer software. Six paired clinical cases (3 CSII, 3 MDI) and associated multiple-choice questions/answers were reviewed by diabetes specialists and presented to participants via a web portal in both software report (SR) and traditional logbook (TL) formats. Participant response time and accuracy were documented and assessed. Participants completed a preference questionnaire at study completion. All participants (54 PWDs, 24 CGVs, 33 HCPs) completed the cases. Participants achieved greater accuracy (assessed by percentage of accurate answers) using the SR versus TL formats: PWDs, 80.3 (13.2)% versus 63.7 (15.0)%, P < .0001; CGVs, 84.6 (8.9)% versus 63.6 (14.4)%, P < .0001; HCPs, 89.5 (8.0)% versus 66.4 (12.3)%, P < .0001. Participants spent less time (minutes) with each case using the SR versus TL formats: PWDs, 8.6 (4.3) versus 19.9 (12.2), P < .0001; CGVs, 7.0 (3.5) versus 15.5 (11.8), P = .0005; HCPs, 6.7 (2.9) versus 16.0 (12.0), P < .0001. The majority of participants preferred using the software reports versus logbook data. Use of the Accu-Chek Connect Online software reports enabled PWDs, CGVs, and HCPs, naïve to diabetes data management software, to identify and utilize key diabetes information with significantly greater accuracy and efficiency compared with traditional logbook information. Use of SRs was preferred over logbooks.
© 2014 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SMBG; diabetes software; insulin; self-management; self-monitoring of blood glucose

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25367012      PMCID: PMC4604583          DOI: 10.1177/1932296814557188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  3 in total

Review 1.  Blood glucose monitoring technology: translating data into practice.

Authors:  Irl B Hirsch
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Accuracy of self-monitored blood glucose in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Rasa Kazlauskaite; Sonia Soni; Arthur T Evans; Kelly Graham; Betty Fisher
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 3.  Comparing patient-generated blood glucose diary records with meter memory in diabetes: a systematic review.

Authors:  J E Given; M J O'Kane; B P Bunting; V E Coates
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.359

  3 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Bolus Advisors: Sources of Error, Targets for Improvement.

Authors:  John Walsh; Ruth Roberts; Timothy S Bailey; Lutz Heinemann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-07-25

2.  Self-Management Behaviors in Adults on Insulin Pump Therapy.

Authors:  Danielle Groat; Maria Adela Grando; Hiral Soni; Bithika Thompson; Mary Boyle; Marilyn Bailey; Curtiss B Cook
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-09-25

3.  12th Roche Diabetes Care Network Meeting: April 11-13, 2019, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Authors:  Christopher G Parkin; Christine Zepezauer; Rolf Hinzmann
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  Improving the Quality of Outpatient Diabetes Care Using an Information Management System: Results From the Observational VISION Study.

Authors:  Joerg Weissmann; Angelika Mueller; Diethelm Messinger; Christopher G Parkin; Ildiko Amann-Zalan
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-07-29

5.  An Adaptive Nonlinear Basal-Bolus Calculator for Patients With Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Dimitri Boiroux; Tinna Björk Aradóttir; Kirsten Nørgaard; Niels Kjølstad Poulsen; Henrik Madsen; John Bagterp Jørgensen
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-09-25

6.  Integrated Personalized Diabetes Management (PDM): Design of the ProValue Studies: Prospective, Cluster-Randomized, Controlled, Intervention Trials for Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Benefit of PDM in Patients With Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Bernhard Kulzer; Wilfried Daenschel; Ingrid Daenschel; Erhard G Siegel; Wendelin Schramm; Christopher G Parkin; Diethelm Messinger; Joerg Weissmann; Zdenka Djuric; Angelika Mueller; Iris Vesper; Lutz Heinemann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-05-03

7.  8th Annual Symposium on Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG): April 16-18, 2015, Republic of Malta.

Authors:  Christopher G Parkin; Anita Homberg; Rolf Hinzmann
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 6.118

8.  Diabetes Data Management System to Improve Glycemic Control in People With Type 1 Diabetes: Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Concetta Irace; Matthias Axel Schweitzer; Cesare Tripolino; Faustina Barbara Scavelli; Agostino Gnasso
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 4.773

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.