C Kloppe1, T Maaßen, U Bösader, C Hanefeld. 1. Medizinische Klinik III, Katholisches Klinikum Bochum, Bleichstr. 15, 44787, Bochum, Deutschland, c.kloppe@klinikum-bochum.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Survival rates after sudden cardiac arrest could be increased if bystanders could be encouraged to perform CPR until emergency services arrive. This should be initiated by the dispatcher at the emergency control facility who receives the call. For the first time the ERC guidelines of 2010 included instructions to be given to untrained rescuers by the dispatcher. Rapid recognition of cardiac arrest and initiation of emergency measures is assured by means of specific training for the dispatchers. AIM: The aim of this investigation was to determine whether the time between an emergency call and beginning of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) could be shortened using a simple protocol and whether a relationship exists between the intensity of phone contact between dispatcher and caller and if this improves the results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In known cases of unconsciousness, group 1 (45 persons) received short CPR instructions via the phone, where the dispatcher was on the phone for continuous advice until emergency services arrived. Group 2 (45 persons) received identical phone instructions like group 1, but the phone call was terminated by the dispatcher after the information was provided. Group 3 (29 persons) only received instructions to start CPR. RESULTS: On average, all test persons in group 1 started reanimation after 68.0 ± 33.5 s, in group 2 after 68.3 ± 25.2 s, and in group 3 after 64.9 ± 34.4 s. The compression frequency on average was 98.3/min in group 1, 84.8/min in group 2, and 85.2/min in group 3; therefore, all groups reached an average frequency of >; 80/min. The correct compression depth was achieved by 47.8 % of test persons in group 1, by 44.2 % in group 2, and by 30.2 % in group 3. All volunteers felt well supported. Of the 90 people, 70 did not feel that they were missing instructions. DISCUSSION: There were no significant differences between the groups regarding the target variables. The results show that already extremely short instructions or advice by the dispatcher to start CPR is sufficient to encourage bystanders to give assistance in an emergency. Continuous support over the phone does not appear to be necessary.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Survival rates after sudden cardiac arrest could be increased if bystanders could be encouraged to perform CPR until emergency services arrive. This should be initiated by the dispatcher at the emergency control facility who receives the call. For the first time the ERC guidelines of 2010 included instructions to be given to untrained rescuers by the dispatcher. Rapid recognition of cardiac arrest and initiation of emergency measures is assured by means of specific training for the dispatchers. AIM: The aim of this investigation was to determine whether the time between an emergency call and beginning of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) could be shortened using a simple protocol and whether a relationship exists between the intensity of phone contact between dispatcher and caller and if this improves the results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In known cases of unconsciousness, group 1 (45 persons) received short CPR instructions via the phone, where the dispatcher was on the phone for continuous advice until emergency services arrived. Group 2 (45 persons) received identical phone instructions like group 1, but the phone call was terminated by the dispatcher after the information was provided. Group 3 (29 persons) only received instructions to start CPR. RESULTS: On average, all test persons in group 1 started reanimation after 68.0 ± 33.5 s, in group 2 after 68.3 ± 25.2 s, and in group 3 after 64.9 ± 34.4 s. The compression frequency on average was 98.3/min in group 1, 84.8/min in group 2, and 85.2/min in group 3; therefore, all groups reached an average frequency of > 80/min. The correct compression depth was achieved by 47.8 % of test persons in group 1, by 44.2 % in group 2, and by 30.2 % in group 3. All volunteers felt well supported. Of the 90 people, 70 did not feel that they were missing instructions. DISCUSSION: There were no significant differences between the groups regarding the target variables. The results show that already extremely short instructions or advice by the dispatcher to start CPR is sufficient to encourage bystanders to give assistance in an emergency. Continuous support over the phone does not appear to be necessary.
Authors: Markku Kuisma; James Boyd; Taneli Väyrynen; Jukka Repo; Maria Nousila-Wiik; Peter Holmström Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Dana P Edelson; Benjamin S Abella; Jo Kramer-Johansen; Lars Wik; Helge Myklebust; Anne M Barry; Raina M Merchant; Terry L Vanden Hoek; Petter A Steen; Lance B Becker Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2006-09-18 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Paolo Terranova; Paolo Valli; Barbara Severgnini; Simonetta Dell'Orto; Greco Enrico Maria Journal: Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J Date: 2006-10-01