Literature DB >> 25366382

Long-term outcome after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: focusing on a group beyond the expanded indication.

Myung Soo Kang1, Su Jin Hong, Dae Yong Kim, Jae Pil Han, Moon Han Choi, Hee Kyung Kim, Bong Min Ko, Moon Sung Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term outcome after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC) according to the pathological extent.
METHODS: ESD were performed in 280 patients with 309 EGC. The tumors were classified by pathological severity based on absolute indication (AI), expanded indication (EI) or beyond expanded indication (BEI). The therapeutic outcomes among the three groups were analyzed.
RESULTS: The complete resection rates of EGC were 96.4%, 78.7% and 41.2% in the AI-EGC, EI-EGC and BEI-EGC groups, respectively (P = 0.000). En bloc resection rates were 97.6%, 87.4% and 86.3% in the AI-EGC, EI-EGC and BEI-EGC groups, respectively (P = 0.023). The 5-year tumor recurrence rates were 1.8%, 1.5% and 15.4% in the AI-EGC, EI-EGC and BEI-EGC groups, respectively (P = 0.000). The 5-year disease-specific survival rates were 100%, 100% and 97.4% in the AI-EGC, EI-GEC and BEI-EGC groups, respectively (P = 0.088). The 5-year disease-free survival rates were 98.2%, 98.5% and 84.6% in the AI-EGC, EI-EGC and BEI-EGC groups, respectively (P = 0.000).
CONCLUSIONS: ESD was effective and safe in treating AI-EGC and EI-EGC, but there was a comparatively high rate of recurrence after ESD in the BEI-EGC group. However, long-term outcomes of patients with BEI-EGC that did not receive additional surgery were better than those with an natural course of EGC. Thus, ESD may be considered for specific BEI-EGC patients at high risk for surgery.
© 2014 Chinese Medical Association Shanghai Branch, Chinese Society of Gastroenterology, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  early gastric cancer; endoscopic submucosal dissection; expanded indication; long-term; outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25366382     DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.12208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dig Dis        ISSN: 1751-2972            Impact factor:   2.325


  11 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes and prognostic factors with non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancer in elderly patients aged ≥ 75 years.

Authors:  Yosuke Toya; Masaki Endo; Shotaro Nakamura; Risaburo Akasaka; Shunichi Yanai; Keisuke Kawasaki; Keisuke Koeda; Makoto Eizuka; Yasuko Fujita; Noriyuki Uesugi; Kazuyuki Ishida; Tamotsu Sugai; Takayuki Matsumoto
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  The role of tumor size in surgical decision making after endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hae Won Kim; Yoo Jin Lee; Jie-Hyun Kim; Jae Jun Park; Young Hoon Youn; Hyojin Park; Jong Won Kim; Seung Ho Choi; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The value of diagnostic endoscopic submucosal dissection for patients with clinical submucosal invasive early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Keiichi Fujiya; Kohei Takizawa; Masanori Tokunaga; Noboru Kawata; Makoto Hikage; Rie Makuuchi; Yutaka Tanizawa; Etsuro Bando; Taiichi Kawamura; Masaki Tanaka; Naomi Kakushima; Hiroyuki Ono; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Clinical outcomes of early gastric cancer patients after noncurative endoscopic submucosal dissection in a large consecutive patient series.

Authors:  Haruhisa Suzuki; Ichiro Oda; Seiichiro Abe; Masau Sekiguchi; Satoru Nonaka; Shigetaka Yoshinaga; Yutaka Saito; Takeo Fukagawa; Hitoshi Katai
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Prognosis after curative resection for stage IA gastric cancer in elderly patients: endoscopic submucosal dissection versus surgery.

Authors:  Koji Miyahara; Michihiro Ishida; Yoshiyasu Kono; Tetsu Hirata; Yuka Obayashi; Tatsuhiro Gotoda; Yuki Ninomiya; Yuki Moritou; Masaki Kunihiro; Tetsushi Kubota; Yasuhiro Choda; Yasuhiro Shirakawa; Masahiro Nakagawa; Hiroyuki Okada
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 2.540

6.  Is the eCura system useful for selecting patients who require radical surgery after noncurative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer? A comparative study.

Authors:  Waku Hatta; Takuji Gotoda; Tsuneo Oyama; Noboru Kawata; Akiko Takahashi; Yoshikazu Yoshifuku; Shu Hoteya; Masahiro Nakagawa; Masaaki Hirano; Mitsuru Esaki; Mitsuru Matsuda; Ken Ohnita; Kohei Yamanouchi; Motoyuki Yoshida; Osamu Dohi; Jun Takada; Keiko Tanaka; Shinya Yamada; Tsuyotoshi Tsuji; Hirotaka Ito; Yoshiaki Hayashi; Tomohiro Nakamura; Naoki Nakaya; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 7.  Endoscopic resection of gastric and esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Bryan Balmadrid; Joo Ha Hwang
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2015-10-27

Review 8.  How to Interpret the Pathological Report before and after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Early Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Dae Young Cheung; Soo-Heon Park
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2016-07-25

Review 9.  Long-Term Outcomes of Using Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection to Treat Early Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Toshihiro Nishizawa; Naohisa Yahagi
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 4.519

10.  Clinical outcomes of early gastric cancer with non-curative resection after pathological evaluation based on the expanded criteria.

Authors:  Hyun Ju Kim; Sang Gyun Kim; Jung Kim; Hyoungju Hong; Hee Jong Lee; Min Seong Kim; Hyunsoo Chung; Hyun Chae Jung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.