STUDY DESIGN: Two-group, repeated-measures reliability study. OBJECTIVES: To determine interrater and intrarater reliability of ultrasound measurements of transverse abdominal (TrA) and lumbar multifidus (LM) muscle thickness, during rest and contraction, in subjects with low back pain (LBP) and healthy subjects over 3 consecutive days, performed by an experienced and a novice rater. BACKGROUND: Previous reliability studies of TrA or LM thickness did not simultaneously account for muscle state, rater experience, and multiday assessment in large subject samples. METHODS: The 2 raters measured TrA and LM thickness on 3 consecutive days in 42 healthy subjects and 56 subjects with LBP, during rest and contraction, and calculated the percent thickness change from rest to contraction. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC(2,k)) and 95% minimal detectable change in thickness were derived for a single measure (day 1) and an average measure (days 1-3). RESULTS: The interrater ICC(2,1) values for single-measure thickness (LBP group, 0.71-0.87; healthy group, 0.94-1.00) were similar to those for average-measure thickness (LBP group, 0.73-0.84; healthy group, 0.93-1.00). Both interrater ICC(2,1) and ICC(2,3) were lower for the relative thickness change (0.61-0.96). Intrarater ICC(2,1) values across 3 consecutive days were high for both raters across the 2 groups (LBP group, 0.95-1.00; healthy group, 0.93-1.00), albeit lower for the relative thickness change (0.79-0.99). The 95% minimal detectable changes were < 0.3 mm for the TrA and < 2 mm for the LM (but, in most cases, less than 10% of average thickness). CONCLUSION: Both experienced and trained novice raters provided reliable measurements of TrA and LM thickness in participants with LBP and healthy participants, during rest and contraction. One-time measurements were similar to averaged measurements. Small absolute errors were observed. Public trial registry: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613001077752.
STUDY DESIGN: Two-group, repeated-measures reliability study. OBJECTIVES: To determine interrater and intrarater reliability of ultrasound measurements of transverse abdominal (TrA) and lumbar multifidus (LM) muscle thickness, during rest and contraction, in subjects with low back pain (LBP) and healthy subjects over 3 consecutive days, performed by an experienced and a novice rater. BACKGROUND: Previous reliability studies of TrA or LM thickness did not simultaneously account for muscle state, rater experience, and multiday assessment in large subject samples. METHODS: The 2 raters measured TrA and LM thickness on 3 consecutive days in 42 healthy subjects and 56 subjects with LBP, during rest and contraction, and calculated the percent thickness change from rest to contraction. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC(2,k)) and 95% minimal detectable change in thickness were derived for a single measure (day 1) and an average measure (days 1-3). RESULTS: The interrater ICC(2,1) values for single-measure thickness (LBP group, 0.71-0.87; healthy group, 0.94-1.00) were similar to those for average-measure thickness (LBP group, 0.73-0.84; healthy group, 0.93-1.00). Both interrater ICC(2,1) and ICC(2,3) were lower for the relative thickness change (0.61-0.96). Intrarater ICC(2,1) values across 3 consecutive days were high for both raters across the 2 groups (LBP group, 0.95-1.00; healthy group, 0.93-1.00), albeit lower for the relative thickness change (0.79-0.99). The 95% minimal detectable changes were < 0.3 mm for the TrA and < 2 mm for the LM (but, in most cases, less than 10% of average thickness). CONCLUSION: Both experienced and trained novice raters provided reliable measurements of TrA and LM thickness in participants with LBP and healthy participants, during rest and contraction. One-time measurements were similar to averaged measurements. Small absolute errors were observed. Public trial registry: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613001077752.
Entities:
Keywords:
assessment; rehabilitation; reproducibility of measurements; trunk; ultrasonography
Authors: Mark A Sutherlin; Matthew Gage; L Colby Mangum; Jay Hertel; Shawn Russell; Susan A Saliba; Joseph M Hart Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Daniel L Belavy; Patrick J Owen; Gabriele Armbrecht; Martin Bansmann; Jochen Zange; Yuan Ling; Regina Pohle-Fröhlich; Dieter Felsenberg Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-04-14 Impact factor: 3.240