Literature DB >> 25365794

Evaluation of urinary protein precipitation protocols for the multidisciplinary approach to the study of chronic pelvic pain research network.

Karen R Jonscher1, Andrea A Osypuk2, Adrie van Bokhoven2, M Scott Lucia2.   

Abstract

Standardization of sample collection, shipping, and storage has been a major focus of biorepositories servicing large, multi-institute studies. The standardization of total protein concentration measurements may also provide an important metric for characterizing biospecimens. The measurement of total protein concentration in urine is challenging because of widely variable sample dilutions obtained in the clinic and the lack of a reference matrix for use with a standard curve and blank subtraction. Urinary proteins are therefore typically precipitated and reconstituted in a reference solution before quantitation. We have tested three different methods for protein precipitation and evaluated them using variability in total protein concentration measurement as a metric. The methods were tested on four urine samples ranging from very concentrated to very dilute. A method using a commercially available kit provided the most reproducible results, with average coefficients of variation <10%. Addition of a freeze/thaw did not lead to significant protein loss or additional variability. Samples were titrated and the measurements obtained appeared to be linearly correlated with sample starting volume. This method was applied to analysis of 77 urine biorepository samples and provided reproducible results when the same sample was assayed on different microwell plates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chemical precipitation; proteomics; quantitation; urine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25365794      PMCID: PMC4211279          DOI: 10.7171/jbt.14-2504-004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol Tech        ISSN: 1524-0215


  27 in total

1.  Systematic evaluation of sample preparation methods for gel-based human urinary proteomics: quantity, quality, and variability.

Authors:  Visith Thongboonkerd; Somchai Chutipongtanate; Rattiyaporn Kanlaya
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.466

2.  Toward a standardized urine proteome analysis methodology.

Authors:  Magali Court; Nathalie Selevsek; Mariette Matondo; Yves Allory; Jerome Garin; Christophe D Masselon; Bruno Domon
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.984

3.  Trichloroacetic acid-induced protein precipitation involves the reversible association of a stable partially structured intermediate.

Authors:  Dakshinamurthy Rajalingam; Charles Loftis; Jiashou J Xu; Thallapuranam Krishnaswamy S Kumar
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  An in-depth comparison of the male pediatric and adult urinary proteomes.

Authors:  John W Froehlich; Ali R Vaezzadeh; Marc Kirchner; Andrew C Briscoe; Oliver Hofmann; Winston Hide; Hanno Steen; Richard S Lee
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2013-05-22

5.  Characterization of the human urinary proteome: a method for high-resolution display of urinary proteins on two-dimensional electrophoresis gels with a yield of nearly 1400 distinct protein spots.

Authors:  Rembert Pieper; Christine L Gatlin; Andrew M McGrath; Anthony J Makusky; Madhu Mondal; Michael Seonarain; Erin Field; Courtney R Schatz; Marla A Estock; Nasir Ahmed; Norman G Anderson; Sandra Steiner
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 6.  The Early Detection Research Network's Specimen reference sets: paving the way for rapid evaluation of potential biomarkers.

Authors:  Ziding Feng; Jacob Kagan; Margaret Pepe; Mark Thornquist; Jo Ann Rinaudo; Jackie Dahlgren; Karl Krueger; Yingye Zheng; Christos Patriotis; Ying Huang; Lynn Sorbara; Ian Thompson; Sudhir Srivastava
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Urinary creatinine concentrations in the U.S. population: implications for urinary biologic monitoring measurements.

Authors:  Dana B Barr; Lynn C Wilder; Samuel P Caudill; Amanda J Gonzalez; Lance L Needham; James L Pirkle
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Identification of potential bladder cancer markers in urine by abundant-protein depletion coupled with quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Chien-Lun Chen; Tsung-Shih Lin; Cheng-Han Tsai; Chih-Ching Wu; Ting Chung; Kun-Yi Chien; Maureen Wu; Yu-Sun Chang; Jau-Song Yu; Yi-Ting Chen
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Urine proteome of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease patients.

Authors:  Magda Bakun; Mariusz Niemczyk; Dominik Domanski; Radek Jazwiec; Anna Perzanowska; Stanislaw Niemczyk; Michal Kistowski; Agnieszka Fabijanska; Agnieszka Borowiec; Leszek Paczek; Michal Dadlez
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.988

10.  New national Biobank of The Danish Center for Strategic Research on Type 2 Diabetes (DD2).

Authors:  Henry Christensen; Jens Steen Nielsen; Karina Meden Sørensen; Mads Melbye; Ivan Brandslund
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 4.790

View more
  2 in total

1.  Relationship Between Blood Cytokine Levels, Psychological Comorbidity, and Widespreadness of Pain in Chronic Pelvic Pain.

Authors:  Bianka Karshikoff; Katherine T Martucci; Sean Mackey
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.157

2.  Association of Longitudinal Changes in Symptoms and Urinary Biomarkers in Patients with Urological Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: A MAPP Research Network Study.

Authors:  Roopali Roy; Alisa J Stephens; Cassandra Daisy; Lauren Merritt; Craig W Newcomb; Jiang Yang; Adelle Dagher; Adam Curatolo; Monisha Sachdev; Brendan McNeish; Richard Landis; Adrie van Bokhoven; Andrew El-Hayek; John Froehlich; Michel A Pontari; David Zurakowski; Richard S Lee; Marsha A Moses
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 7.450

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.