Literature DB >> 25365531

Finding a needle in a haystack: toward a psychologically informed method for aviation security screening.

Thomas C Ormerod1, Coral J Dando2.   

Abstract

Current aviation security systems identify behavioral indicators of deception to assess risks to flights, but they lack a strong psychological basis or empirical validation. We present a new method that tests the veracity of passenger accounts. In an in vivo double-blind randomized-control trial conducted in international airports, security agents detected 66% of deceptive passengers using the veracity test method compared with less than 5% using behavioral indicator recognition. As well as revealing advantages of veracity testing over behavioral indicator identification, the study provides the highest levels to date of deception detection in a realistic setting where the known base rate of deceptive individuals is low.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25365531     DOI: 10.1037/xge0000030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  8 in total

1.  Group discussion improves lie detection.

Authors:  Nadav Klein; Nicholas Epley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Unanticipated questions can yield unanticipated outcomes in investigative interviews.

Authors:  Tom Parkhouse; Thomas C Ormerod
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Being accurate about accuracy in verbal deception detection.

Authors:  Bennett Kleinberg; Arnoud Arntz; Bruno Verschuere
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Deception and Cognitive Load: Expanding Our Horizon with a Working Memory Model.

Authors:  Siegfried L Sporer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-04-07

5.  Perceptions of Psychological Coercion and Human Trafficking in the West Midlands of England: Beginning to Know the Unknown.

Authors:  Coral J Dando; David Walsh; Robin Brierley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Automated verbal credibility assessment of intentions: The model statement technique and predictive modeling.

Authors:  Bennett Kleinberg; Yaloe van der Toolen; Aldert Vrij; Arnoud Arntz; Bruno Verschuere
Journal:  Appl Cogn Psychol       Date:  2018-04-02

7.  Detecting false intentions using unanticipated questions.

Authors:  Glynis Bogaard; Joyce van der Mark; Ewout H Meijer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Rapport building and witness memory: Actions may 'speak' louder than words.

Authors:  Zacharia Nahouli; Coral J Dando; Jay-Marie Mackenzie; Andreas Aresti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.