Literature DB >> 25365516

Fate of artificial sweeteners in wastewater treatment plants in New York State, U.S.A.

Bikram Subedi1, Kurunthachalam Kannan.   

Abstract

Very few studies describe the fate of artificial sweeteners (ASWs) in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). In this study, mass loadings, removal efficiencies, and environmental emission of sucralose, saccharin, aspartame, and acesulfame were determined based on the concentrations measured in wastewater influent, primary effluent, effluent, suspended particulate matter (SPM), and sludge collected from two WWTPs in the Albany area of New York State, U.S.A. All ASWs were detected at a mean concentration that ranged from 0.13 (aspartame) to 29.4 μg/L (sucralose) in wastewater influent, 0.49 (aspartame) to 27.7 μg/L (sucralose) in primary influent, 0.11 (aspartame) to 29.6 μg/L (sucralose) in effluent, and from 0.08 (aspartame) to 0.65 μg/g dw (sucralose) in sludge. Aspartame was found in 92% of influent SPM samples at a mean concentration of 444 ng/g dw, followed by acesulfame (92 ng/g) and saccharin (49 ng/g). The fraction of the total mass of ASWs sorbed to SPM was in the rank order: aspartame (50.4%) > acesulfame (10.9%) > saccharin and sucralose (0.8%). The sorption coefficients of ASWs ranged from 4.10 (saccharin) to 4540 L/kg (aspartame). Significant removal of aspartame (68.2%) and saccharin (90.3%) was found in WWTPs; however, sucralose and acesulfame were less efficiently removed (<2.0%). The total mass loading of sucralose, saccharin, and acesulfame in the WWTP that served a smaller population (∼15,000) was 1.3-1.5 times lower than that in another WWTP that served a larger population (∼100,000). The average daily loading of sucralose in both WWTPs (18.5 g/d/1000 people) was ∼2 times higher than the average loading of saccharin. The daily discharge of sucralose from the WWTPs was the highest (17.6 g/d/1000 people), followed by acesulfame (1.22 g/d/1000 people), and saccharin (1.07 g/d/1000 people). Approximately, 1180 g of saccharin and 291 g of acesulfame were transformed in or removed daily from the two WWTPs. This is the first study to describe the fate of ASWs, including the fraction found in SPM and in sludge, in addition to the aqueous portion of wastewater in WWTPs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25365516     DOI: 10.1021/es504769c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  9 in total

1.  Monitoring contaminants of emerging concern from tertiary wastewater treatment plants using passive sampling modelled with performance reference compounds.

Authors:  Tamanna Sultana; Craig Murray; M Ehsanul Hoque; Chris D Metcalfe
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Ecotoxicological survey of MNEI and Y65R-MNEI proteins as new potential high-intensity sweeteners.

Authors:  Michele Fortunato Rega; Antonietta Siciliano; Renato Gesuele; Giusy Lofrano; Andrea Carpentieri; Delia Picone; Marco Guida
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Nonnutritive sweeteners can promote the dissemination of antibiotic resistance through conjugative gene transfer.

Authors:  Zhigang Yu; Yue Wang; Ji Lu; Philip L Bond; Jianhua Guo
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 10.302

4.  Biodegradation of the artificial sweetener acesulfame in biological wastewater treatment and sandfilters.

Authors:  Sandro Castronovo; Arne Wick; Marco Scheurer; Karsten Nödler; Manoj Schulz; Thomas A Ternes
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 11.236

5.  Fate of artificial sweeteners through wastewater treatment plants and water treatment processes.

Authors:  Shaoli Li; Yuhang Ren; Yingying Fu; Xingsheng Gao; Cong Jiang; Gang Wu; Hongqiang Ren; Jinju Geng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Removal of artificial sweeteners and their effects on microbial communities in sequencing batch reactors.

Authors:  Shaoli Li; Jinju Geng; Gang Wu; Xingsheng Gao; Yingying Fu; Hongqiang Ren
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Efficient Degradation of Acesulfame by Ozone/Peroxymonosulfate Advanced Oxidation Process.

Authors:  Yu Shao; Zhicheng Pang; Lili Wang; Xiaowei Liu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 8.  Environmental Impact of the Presence, Distribution, and Use of Artificial Sweeteners as Emerging Sources of Pollution.

Authors:  Ab Qayoom Naik; Tabassum Zafar; Vinoy Kumar Shrivastava
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2021-04-14

Review 9.  A Review of the Environmental Fate and Effects of Acesulfame-Potassium.

Authors:  Kerry Belton; Edward Schaefer; Patrick D Guiney
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 2.992

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.