Cost-effectiveness of non-invasive assessment in the Dutch breast cancer screening program versus usual care: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Increased recall rates in the Dutch breast cancer screening program call for a new assessment strategy aiming to reduce unnecessary costs and anxiety. Diagnostic work-up (usual care) includes multidisciplinary hospital assessment and is similar for all recalled women, regardless of the radiologist's suspicion of breast cancer. This is similar in many Canadian settings. We developed a novel assessment strategy that offers women with a low suspicion of breast cancer a quick and non-invasive assessment by a screening radiologist (intervention). We compared these two strategies in a cost-effectiveness analysis based on a randomized controlled trial: multicentre randomized controlled trial (MASS trial, Netherlands National Trial Register: NTR1480).
METHODS: Participants were enrolled between August 2010 and December 2012 and were randomly assigned to either the intervention or control group (allocation ratio 2:1). Fourteen assessment centres participated in the study. Questionnaires were used to record quality of life (EuroQol-5D), health care use and costs after recall.
RESULTS: Our study comprised 366 women, of whom 288 were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 88 to the control group. The mean difference in cost was €153/CAD $226 (95% confidence interval €107-199/CAD $158-294, p<0.001). We found no significant differences in quality of life. The bootstrapped incremental cost-effectiveness ratios in the cost-effectiveness plane showed that the intervention was the efficient, cost-saving modality.
CONCLUSION: Our data show the benefits of tailoring diagnostic assessment to the screening radiologist's suspicion of breast cancer. Scenarios of implementing such a strategy in the Dutch screening or health care system are currently being discussed with various stakeholders.

RCT Entities:   Population Interventions Outcomes