Literature DB >> 25365121

Adolescents misperceive and are influenced by high-status peers' health risk, deviant, and adaptive behavior.

Sarah W Helms1, Sophia Choukas-Bradley1, Laura Widman1, Matteo Giletta2, Geoffrey L Cohen3, Mitchell J Prinstein1.   

Abstract

Most peer influence research examines socialization between adolescents and their best friends. Yet, adolescents also are influenced by popular peers, perhaps due to misperceptions of social norms. This research examined the extent to which out-group and in-group adolescents misperceive the frequencies of peers' deviant, health risk, and adaptive behaviors in different reputation-based peer crowds (Study 1) and the prospective associations between perceptions of high-status peers' and adolescents' own substance use over 2.5 years (Study 2). Study 1 examined 235 adolescents' reported deviant (vandalism, theft), health risk (substance use, sexual risk), and adaptive (exercise, studying) behavior, and their perceptions of jocks', populars', burnouts', and brains' engagement in the same behaviors. Peer nominations identified adolescents in each peer crowd. Jocks and populars were rated as higher status than brains and burnouts. Results indicated that peer crowd stereotypes are caricatures. Misperceptions of high-status crowds were dramatic, but for many behaviors, no differences between populars'/jocks' and others' actual reported behaviors were revealed. Study 2 assessed 166 adolescents' substance use and their perceptions of popular peers' (i.e., peers high in peer perceived popularity) substance use. Parallel process latent growth analyses revealed that higher perceptions of popular peers' substance use in Grade 9 (intercept) significantly predicted steeper increases in adolescents' own substance use from Grade 9 to 11 (slope). Results from both studies, utilizing different methods, offer evidence to suggest that adolescents misperceive high-status peers' risk behaviors, and these misperceptions may predict adolescents' own risk behavior engagement. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25365121      PMCID: PMC4480612          DOI: 10.1037/a0038178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychol        ISSN: 0012-1649


  30 in total

1.  Misperceptions of the norms for the frequency of alcohol and other drug use on college campuses.

Authors:  H W Perkins; P W Meilman; J S Leichliter; J R Cashin; C A Presley
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  1999-05

2.  When interventions harm. Peer groups and problem behavior.

Authors:  T J Dishion; J McCord; F Poulin
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1999-09

3.  Adolescent peer crowd affiliation: linkages with health-risk behaviors and close friendships.

Authors:  A M La Greca; M J Prinstein; M D Fetter
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2001 Apr-May

4.  Misperceiving the college drinking norm and related problems: a nationwide study of exposure to prevention information, perceived norms and student alcohol misuse.

Authors:  H Wesley Perkins; Michael P Haines; Richard Rice
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2005-07

5.  False consensus and adolescent peer contagion: examining discrepancies between perceptions and actual reported levels of friends' deviant and health risk behaviors.

Authors:  Mitchell J Prinstein; Shirley S Wang
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2005-06

6.  Ethnicity and image: correlates of crowd affiliation among ethnic minority youth.

Authors:  B Bradford Brown; Melissa Herman; Jill V Hamm; Daniel J Heck
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2008 May-Jun

7.  High peer popularity longitudinally predicts adolescent health risk behavior, or does it?: an examination of linear and quadratic associations.

Authors:  Mitchell J Prinstein; Sophia C Choukas-Bradley; Sarah W Helms; Whitney A Brechwald; Diana Rancourt
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2011-08-18

8.  Peer interaction: what causes what?

Authors:  Willard W Hartup
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2005-06

9.  Prevalence estimates and adolescent risk behavior: cross-cultural differences in social influence.

Authors:  F X Gibbons; M Helweg-Larsen; M Gerrard
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1995-02

10.  Descriptive and injunctive norms in college drinking: a meta-analytic integration.

Authors:  Brian Borsari; Kate B Carey
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2003-05
View more
  22 in total

1.  Popular peer norms and adolescent sexting behavior.

Authors:  Anne J Maheux; Reina Evans; Laura Widman; Jacqueline Nesi; Mitchell J Prinstein; Sophia Choukas-Bradley
Journal:  J Adolesc       Date:  2019-12-13

Review 2.  A review of psychosocial factors linked to adolescent substance use.

Authors:  Elisa M Trucco
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 3.  Why Interventions to Influence Adolescent Behavior Often Fail but Could Succeed.

Authors:  David S Yeager; Ronald E Dahl; Carol S Dweck
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-12-12

4.  Perceptions of alcohol use by friends compared to peers: Associations with middle adolescents' own use.

Authors:  Jonathon J Beckmeyer; Elizabeth H Weybright
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.716

5.  Adolescent Sexting Involvement Over 4 Years and Associations With Sexual Activity.

Authors:  Hye Jeong Choi; Camille Mori; Joris Van Ouytsel; Sheri Madigan; Jeff R Temple
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 5.012

6.  Understanding the Etiology of Adolescent Substance Use through Developmental Perspectives.

Authors:  Elisa M Trucco; Sarah A Hartmann
Journal:  Child Dev Perspect       Date:  2021-08-24

7.  Leveraging dynamic norms to reduce alcohol use among college students: A proof-of-concept experimental study.

Authors:  Scott Graupensperger; Christine M Lee; Mary E Larimer
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  Psychological affordances help explain where a self-transcendent purpose intervention improves performance.

Authors:  Stephanie L Reeves; Marlone D Henderson; Geoffrey L Cohen; Rebecca R Steingut; Quinn Hirschi; David S Yeager
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2020-07-16

9.  Policy Recommendations for Preventing Problematic Internet Use in Schools: A Qualitative Study of Parental Perspectives.

Authors:  Melina A Throuvala; Mark D Griffiths; Mike Rennoldson; Daria J Kuss
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Cognitive control deployment is flexibly modulated by social value in early adolescence.

Authors:  Paul B Sharp; Kathy T Do; Kristen A Lindquist; Mitchell J Prinstein; Eva H Telzer
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2021-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.