Literature DB >> 25364994

Patient perspectives on buprenorphine/naloxone: a qualitative study of retention during the starting treatment with agonist replacement therapies (START) study.

Cheryl Teruya1, Robert P Schwartz, Shannon Gwin Mitchell, Albert L Hasson, Christie Thomas, Samantha H Buoncristiani, Yih-Ing Hser, Katharina Wiest, Allan J Cohen, Naomi Glick, Petra Jacobs, Paul McLaughlin, Walter Ling.   

Abstract

This study examines the barriers and facilitators of retention among patients receiving buprenorphine/naloxone at eight community-based opioid treatment programs across the United States. Participants (n = 105) were recruited up to three and a half years after having participated in a randomized clinical trial comparing the effect of buprenorphine/naloxone and methadone on liver function. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 67 patients provided with buprenorphine/naloxone who had terminated early and 38 patients who had completed at least 24 weeks of the trial. Qualitative data were analyzed using the constant comparison method. Barriers to buprenorphine/naloxone retention that emerged included factors associated with: (1) the design of the clinical trial; (2) negative medication or treatment experience; and (3) personal circumstances. The facilitators comprised: (1) positive experience with the medication; (2) personal determination and commitment to complete; and (3) staff encouragement and support. The themes drawn from interviews highlight the importance of considering patients' prior experience with buprenorphine/naloxone and methadone, medication preference, personal circumstances, and motivation to abstain from illicit use or misuse of opioids, as these may influence retention. Ongoing education of patients and staff regarding buprenorphine/naloxone, especially in comparison to methadone, and support from staff and peers are essential.

Entities:  

Keywords:  buprenorphine; patient perspectives; qualitative; retention

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25364994      PMCID: PMC4220245          DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2014.921743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychoactive Drugs        ISSN: 0279-1072


  60 in total

1.  Reduction or cessation of injecting risk behaviours? Treatment outcomes at 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Michael Gossop; John Marsden; Duncan Stewart; Tara Kidd
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 2.  Microbial infections, immunomodulation, and drugs of abuse.

Authors:  Herman Friedman; Catherine Newton; Thomas W Klein
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  A controlled trial comparing buprenorphine and methadone maintenance in opioid dependence.

Authors:  W Ling; D R Wesson; C Charuvastra; C J Klett
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1996-05

4.  Continued drug use and other cofactors for progression to AIDS among injecting drug users.

Authors:  P J Ronald; J R Robertson; R A Elton
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.177

Review 5.  Drugs of abuse and infectious diseases.

Authors:  S Specter
Journal:  J Fla Med Assoc       Date:  1994-07

Review 6.  Buprenorphine and naloxone for heroin dependence.

Authors:  R E Johnson; J C McCagh
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.285

7.  Pre-treatment characteristics, program philosophy and level of ancillary services as predictors of methadone maintenance treatment outcome.

Authors:  A J Saxon; E A Wells; C Fleming; T R Jackson; D A Calsyn
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 6.526

8.  Human immunodeficiency virus seroconversion among intravenous drug users in- and out-of-treatment: an 18-month prospective follow-up.

Authors:  D S Metzger; G E Woody; A T McLellan; C P O'Brien; P Druley; H Navaline; D DePhilippis; P Stolley; E Abrutyn
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (1988)       Date:  1993-09

9.  Comparison of buprenorphine and methadone in the treatment of opioid dependence.

Authors:  E C Strain; M L Stitzer; I A Liebson; G E Bigelow
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 18.112

10.  Buprenorphine versus methadone maintenance therapy: a randomized double-blind trial with 405 opioid-dependent patients.

Authors:  Richard P Mattick; Robert Ali; Jason M White; Susannah O'Brien; Seija Wolk; Cath Danz
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.526

View more
  26 in total

1.  Factors associated with buprenorphine versus methadone use in pregnancy.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Krans; Debra Bogen; Gale Richardson; Seo Young Park; Shannon L Dunn; Nancy Day
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.716

2.  The OPTIMA study, buprenorphine/naloxone and methadone models of care for the treatment of prescription opioid use disorder: Study design and rationale.

Authors:  M Eugenia Socias; Keith Ahamad; Bernard Le Foll; Ron Lim; Julie Bruneau; Benedikt Fischer; T Cameron Wild; Evan Wood; Didier Jutras-Aswad
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Patient Barriers and Facilitators to Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Primary Care.

Authors:  Babak Tofighi; Arthur Robin Williams; Chemi Chemi; Selena Suhail-Sindhu; Vicky Dickson; Joshua D Lee
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 2.164

4.  Tapering off and returning to buprenorphine maintenance in a primary care Office Based Addiction Treatment (OBAT) program.

Authors:  Zoe M Weinstein; Gabriela Gryczynski; Debbie M Cheng; Emily Quinn; David Hui; Hyunjoong W Kim; Colleen Labelle; Jeffrey H Samet
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 5.  Opioid Use Disorder in Pregnancy: Health Policy and Practice in the Midst of an Epidemic.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Krans; Stephen W Patrick
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Opioid agonist therapy.

Authors:  Kathleen Broad; Hector Ahmed Colon-Rivera; Lamia Haque
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Treatment outcomes in opioid dependent patients with different buprenorphine/naloxone induction dosing patterns and trajectories.

Authors:  Petra Jacobs; Alfonso Ang; Maureen P Hillhouse; Andrew J Saxon; Suzanne Nielsen; Paul G Wakim; Barbara E Mai; Larissa J Mooney; Jennifer S Potter; Jack D Blaine
Journal:  Am J Addict       Date:  2015-09-24

8.  Effects of access barriers and medication acceptability on buprenorphine-naloxone treatment utilization over 2 years: Results from a multisite randomized trial of adults with opioid use disorder.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Evans; Caroline Yoo; David Huang; Andrew J Saxon; Yih-Ing Hser
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2019-08-07

9.  Long-term outcomes after randomization to buprenorphine/naloxone versus methadone in a multi-site trial.

Authors:  Yih-Ing Hser; Elizabeth Evans; David Huang; Robert Weiss; Andrew Saxon; Kathleen M Carroll; George Woody; David Liu; Paul Wakim; Abigail G Matthews; Mary Hatch-Maillette; Eve Jelstrom; Katharina Wiest; Paul McLaughlin; Walter Ling
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 6.526

10.  Treatment retention among patients randomized to buprenorphine/naloxone compared to methadone in a multi-site trial.

Authors:  Yih-Ing Hser; Andrew J Saxon; David Huang; Al Hasson; Christie Thomas; Maureen Hillhouse; Petra Jacobs; Cheryl Teruya; Paul McLaughlin; Katharina Wiest; Allan Cohen; Walter Ling
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 6.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.