| Literature DB >> 25364733 |
Vimal K Singh1, Abhishek Saini1, Kohichiro Tsuji2, P B Sharma1, Ramesh Chandra3.
Abstract
Blood transfusions are routinely done in every medical regimen and a worldwide established collection, processing/storage centers provide their services for the same. There have been extreme global demands for both raising the current collections and supply of safe/adequate blood due to increasingly demanding population. With, various risks remain associated with the donor derived blood, and a number of post collection blood screening and processing methods put extreme constraints on supply system especially in the underdeveloped countries. A logistic approach to manufacture erythrocytes ex-vivo by using modern tissue culture techniques have surfaced in the past few years. There are several reports showing the possibilities of RBCs (and even platelets/neutrophils) expansion under tightly regulated conditions. In fact, ex vivo synthesis of the few units of clinical grade RBCs from a single dose of starting material such as umbilical cord blood (CB) has been well established. Similarly, many different sources are also being explored for the same purpose, such as embryonic stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells. However, the major concerns remain elusive before the manufacture and clinical use of different blood components may be used to successfully replace the present system of donor derived blood transfusion. The most important factor shall include the large scale of RBCs production from each donated unit within a limited time period and cost of their production, both of these issues need to be handled carefully since many of the recipients among developing countries are unable to pay even for the freely available donor derived blood. Anyways, keeping these issues in mind, present article shall be focused on the possibilities of blood production and their use in the near future.Entities:
Keywords: RBCs; ex-vivo erythrocytes; hematopoietic stem cells; induced pluripotent stem cells; manufacturing blood
Year: 2014 PMID: 25364733 PMCID: PMC4206981 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2014.00026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol ISSN: 2296-634X
Figure 2The various methods/protocols described so far for the . As discussed in the main text, manufacturing blood may involve various step which are to be categorized in three main phases as depicted in the figure. In phase 1: initial source material is to be collected from a variety of source material(s) on the basis of their availability, suitability, and expansion potential and grown in medium generally supplemented with growth factors to enhance HSCs proliferation: subsequently these cells are cultured in the presence of Erythropoietin to induce their differentiation and maintenance into erythropoietic progenitor stage. Finally, in Phase 3 cultures these Erythropoietic progenitors may be co cultured with murine/human stromal cell line support to induce their maturation and enucleation resulting into mature RBCs. These RBCs are evaluated for their biochemical properties and various antigenic profiles to ensure their nativeness.
Figure 3An overview of the various approaches used for . The different approaches are in use for develoing large amount of transfusable clinical grade RBCs include CD34+ HSPCs (from CB, PB, BM), ESCs/IPSCs derived erythroid progenitors, and highly expanding erythroid progenitors due to stress erythropoiesis. All these approaches has been discussed in detail in text.
Figure 1Hierarchy of erythropoietic development in vertebrates. In adult Bone Marrow, committed progenitors arising from hematopoietic stem cells give rise to erythroblasts, and as the progeny of a stem cell progress through development, there is a loss of their multipotency while increasing lineage restriction. The various cellular stages in erythrocyte development are identified by their ability to form colonies in semisolid medium supplemented with specific cytokines and by cell surface markers.
Progression in the field of .
| 1 | CB CD34+ 21 days | FLT-3, SCF, TPO, EPO, IGF-1 | NO | NA | NA | 4% | No | Basis for transfusion potential of | Neildez-Nguyen et al., |
| 99% | |||||||||
| 2 | Cord blood 21 days | SCF, IL-3, EPO hydrocortisone | Murine stromal mMS-5 | 1.95 × 106 | 4.6/CB | 95% | No | First | Giarratana et al., |
| 3 | Cord blood 60 days | EPO, SCF, IGF-1 dex and lipid mix | No | 109 | -NA | −100% | Yes | Prolonged expansion protocol up to 60 days for adult globin switching | Leberbauer et al., |
| 4 | Cord blood 20 days | SCF, IL-3, EPO VEGF, IGF-2 | No | 7.2 × 105 | 104/CB | 77.5% | Yes | Low expansion and enucleation rates | Miharada et al., |
| 5 | Cord blood 21 days | SCF, IL-3, EPO, TPO, Flt-3 | Human MSCs | 8 × 103 | 0.02/CB | 64% | No | Less allogenicity, lower expansion, and enucleation rates, replaced BM derived feeder cells with UCB derived cells | Baek et al., |
| 6 | Cord blood 38 days | SCF+Flt-3+TPO IL-3+EPO | hTERT+ Macrophages | 3.5 × 106 | 8.8/CB | 100% | Yes | Impossible to scale up | Fujimi et al., |
| 7 | hESCs 59 days | Hydrocortisone, IL3, BMP-4, SCF, EPO, IGF-1 | hMSCs, mMS-5 | 4 × 107 cells | NA | (6.5%, starting from CD34+ cells) | Yes | Globin switching | Qiu et al., |
| FH-B-hTERT | |||||||||
| 8 | hESCs 42 days | SCF, Epo, BMP-4, VEGF, bFGF, TPO, FLT3 L | MEFs, OP9 | 1010–1011 cells/6-well plate of hESCs | NA | 10–65% | No | Functional oxygen carrying capacity of ESCs derived RBCs | Lu et al., |
| 10 | hiPSCs,(MR90, FD-136) | SCF,TPO, FLT3-L, TPO, BMP-4; VEGF- IL-3, IL-6 | hIPSCs | NA | 4–10% | No | First time complete differentiation of hiPSCs cells into definitive erythrocytes capable of maturation up to enucleated RBCs (fetal hemoglobin in a functional tetrameric form) | Lapillonne et al., | |
| hESCs(H1I) 46 days | 4.4 × 108 | 52–66% | |||||||
| hESCs 35 × 108 | |||||||||
| 11 | Cord blood 33 days | SCF, IL-3, EPO hydrocortisone | No | 2.25 × 108 | −500 units/UCB | >90% | No | First serum-free culture, first demonstration of RBC culture in a large-scale bioreactor | Timmins et al., |
| 12 | Cord blood 18 days | SCF, EPO hydrocortisone | No | 4.3 × 107 | 75/CB | 70% | Yes | Best yield to date | Giarratana et al., |
| 13 | hiPSCs 59 days | Hydrocortisone, IL-3 BMP-4, Flt3L, SCF, EPO, IGF-1 | hMSCs/Matrigel. | 0.5–8 × 106 | NA | NA | Yes | Production of large number of erythroid cells with embryonic and fetal-like characteristics regardless of the age of donor tissue | Chang et al., |
| hTERT immortalized fetal liver cells | |||||||||
| 14 | hESCs hiPSCs 60–125 days | Iron saturated transferrin, dexamethasone, insulin, SCF, EPO, TPO, IL-3, IL-6 | MEFs, mOP9 mMS-5 | 2 × 105 ESCs | NA | 2–10% | Yes | RBCs production from transgenic and transgene-free iPSCs using the OP9 coculture method with efficiency comparable to hESCs | Dias et al., |
| 15 | hiPSCs 52 days | holo-human transferrin recombinant human insulin heparin, and 5% human plasma SCF, TPO, FLT3 ligand, BMP4, VEGF- n-3, IL-Epo | MEFs | 15–28.3 × 108 | NA | 20–26% RBC and 74–80% orthochromatic erythroblasts | 5–10% Hu plasma | First time in a normal and a pathological erythropoietic differentiation models that hiPSC are intrinsically able to mature into adult hemoglobin synthesizing cells | Kobari et al., |