Literature DB >> 25364625

Affordable Care Act risk adjustment: overview, context, and challenges.

John Kautter1, Gregory C Pope1, Patricia Keenan2.   

Abstract

Beginning in 2014, individuals and small businesses will be able to purchase private health insurance through competitive marketplaces. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) provides for a program of risk adjustment in the individual and small group markets in 2014 as Marketplaces are implemented and new market reforms take effect. The purpose of risk adjustment is to lessen or eliminate the influence of risk selection on the premiums that plans charge and the incentive for plans to avoid sicker enrollees. This article--the first of three in the Medicare & Medicaid Research Review--describes the key program goal and issues in the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) developed risk adjustment methodology, and identifies key choices in how the methodology responds to these issues. The goal of the HHS risk adjustment methodology is to compensate health insurance plans for differences in enrollee health mix so that plan premiums reflect differences in scope of coverage and other plan factors, but not differences in health status. The methodology includes a risk adjustment model and a risk transfer formula that together address this program goal as well as three issues specific to ACA risk adjustment: 1) new population; 2) cost and rating factors; and 3) balanced transfers within state/market. The risk adjustment model, described in the second article, estimates differences in health risks taking into account the new population and scope of coverage (actuarial value level). The transfer formula, described in the third article, calculates balanced transfers that are intended to account for health risk differences while preserving permissible premium differences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACA; affordable care act; health insurance marketplaces; plan liability risk score; risk adjustment; risk equalization; risk selection; risk transfers

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25364625      PMCID: PMC4214269          DOI: 10.5600/mmrr.004.03.a02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev        ISSN: 2159-0354


  6 in total

1.  The HHS-HCC risk adjustment model for individual and small group markets under the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  John Kautter; Gregory C Pope; Melvin Ingber; Sara Freeman; Lindsey Patterson; Michael Cohen; Patricia Keenan
Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev       Date:  2014-05-09

2.  Risk equalisation in voluntary health insurance markets: A three country comparison.

Authors:  John Armstrong; Francesco Paolucci; Heather McLeod; Wynand P M M van de Ven
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Risk transfer formula for individual and small group markets under the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Gregory C Pope; Henry Bachofer; Andrew Pearlman; John Kautter; Elizabeth Hunter; Daniel Miller; Patricia Keenan
Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev       Date:  2014-09-05

4.  Improvements in Medicare Part D risk adjustment: beneficiary access and payment accuracy.

Authors:  John Kautter; Melvin Ingber; Gregory C Pope; Sara Freeman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; HHS notice of benefit and payment parameters for 2015. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2014-03-11

6.  Risk adjustment of Medicare capitation payments using the CMS-HCC model.

Authors:  Gregory C Pope; John Kautter; Randall P Ellis; Arlene S Ash; John Z Ayanian; Lisa I Lezzoni; Melvin J Ingber; Jesse M Levy; John Robst
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2004
  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  Risk transfer formula for individual and small group markets under the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Gregory C Pope; Henry Bachofer; Andrew Pearlman; John Kautter; Elizabeth Hunter; Daniel Miller; Patricia Keenan
Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev       Date:  2014-09-05

2.  Spatial risk adjustment between health insurances: using GWR in risk adjustment models to conserve incentives for service optimisation and reduce MAUP.

Authors:  Danny Wende
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2019-06-13

3.  Development and Assessment of a New Framework for Disease Surveillance, Prediction, and Risk Adjustment: The Diagnostic Items Classification System.

Authors:  Randall P Ellis; Heather E Hsu; Jeffrey J Siracuse; Allan J Walkey; Karen E Lasser; Brian C Jacobson; Corinne Andriola; Alex Hoagland; Ying Liu; Chenlu Song; Tzu-Chun Kuo; Arlene S Ash
Journal:  JAMA Health Forum       Date:  2022-03-25

4.  Diagnostic Category Prevalence in 3 Classification Systems Across the Transition to the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification.

Authors:  Randall P Ellis; Heather E Hsu; Chenlu Song; Tzu-Chun Kuo; Bruno Martins; Jeffrey J Siracuse; Ying Liu; Arlene S Ash
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-04-01

5.  Government regulation of private health insurance.

Authors:  Nkengafac Villyen Motaze; Primus Che Chi; Pierre Ongolo-Zogo; Jean Serge Ndongo; Charles S Wiysonge
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-02-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.