Literature DB >> 25363999

Effect of caffeine on intravenous adenosine-induced hyperemia in fractional flow reserve measurement.

Hidenari Matsumoto1, Kenji Nakatsuma, Toshihiko Shimada, Shunpei Ushimaru, Mikiko Mikuri, Taketoshi Yamazaki, Tetsuya Matsuda.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The interaction between caffeine and adenosine is still a matter of debate. AIMS: We examined whether caffeine attenuated intravenous adenosine-induced hyperemia in the measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and whether an increased dose of adenosine overcame the caffeine antagonism.
METHODS: FFR was measured using different adenosine doses (140, 175, and 210 μg/kg/min) and papaverine as a reference standard in patients with intermediate coronary stenoses, who refrained from caffeine for >24 h (no-caffeine group; n = 14) and those who consumed caffeine (caffeine group; n = 28).
RESULTS: The median caffeine level in the caffeine group was 2.9 mg/L (interquartile range, 1.8-4.6 mg/L). In the no-caffeine group, FFR with adenosine did not decrease above the dose of 140 μg/kg/min (0.769, 0.771, and 0.770 at 140, 175, and 210 μg/kg/min, respectively) and was not significantly different from that with papaverine (0.765). In the caffeine group, adenosine overestimated FFR (140 μg/kg/min: 0.813, P<.001; 175 μg/kg/min: 0.806, P<.01; 210 μg/kg/min: 0.794, P=.01) compared with papaverine (0.779). The difference in FFR between papaverine and 140 μg/kg/min dose of adenosine was significantly greater in the caffeine group than in the no-caffeine group (0.034 vs 0.004; P<.05).
CONCLUSION: Caffeine attenuates intravenous adenosine-induced hyperemia in FFR measurement. Even increased adenosine doses up to 210 μg/kg/min cannot fully surmount the antagonism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25363999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol        ISSN: 1042-3931            Impact factor:   2.022


  17 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Application of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Valay Parikh; Kanishk Agnihotri; Sabeeda Kadavath; Nileshkumar J Patel; J Dawn Abbott
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Integrating Physiology into the DNA of Coronary Revascularisation - A Historical Perspective, Contemporary Review and Blueprint for the Future of Coronary Physiology.

Authors:  Sen Sayan; Justin Davies
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2015-05

Review 3.  Non-hyperaemic coronary pressure measurements to guide coronary interventions.

Authors:  Tim P van de Hoef; Joo Myung Lee; Mauro Echavarria-Pinto; Bon-Kwon Koo; Hitoshi Matsuo; Manesh R Patel; Justin E Davies; Javier Escaned; Jan J Piek
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 4.  Clinical use of physiological lesion assessment using pressure guidewires: an expert consensus document of the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics-update 2022.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Kawase; Hitoshi Matsuo; Shoichi Kuramitsu; Yasutsugu Shiono; Takashi Akasaka; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Tetsuya Amano; Ken Kozuma; Masato Nakamura; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Yoshio Kobayashi; Yuji Ikari
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2022-05-11

Review 5.  Coronary Physiology Assessment for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease.

Authors:  Ali E Denktas; David Paniagua; Hani Jneid
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.113

6.  Caffeine reduces the sensitivity of vasodilator MPI for the detection of myocardial ischaemia: Pro.

Authors:  Eliana Reyes
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  Fractional flow reserve-guided management in stable coronary disease and acute myocardial infarction: recent developments.

Authors:  Colin Berry; David Corcoran; Barry Hennigan; Stuart Watkins; Jamie Layland; Keith G Oldroyd
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 8.  Fractional flow reserve: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  David Corcoran; Barry Hennigan; Colin Berry
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Assessment of increasing intravenous adenosine dose in fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  David Sparv; Matthias Götberg; Jan Harnek; Tobias Persson; Bjarne Madsen Hardig; David Erlinge
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 2.298

10.  Effect of High (200 μg/kg per Minute) Adenosine Dose Infusion on Fractional Flow Reserve Variability.

Authors:  Dimitrios Alexopoulos; Ioanna Xanthopoulou; Grigorios Tsigkas; Nikolaos Koutsogiannis; Paraskevi Salata; Stylianos Armylagos; Athanasios Moulias; Periklis Davlouros
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.