Literature DB >> 25363856

Posteriorly enclavated iris claw intraocular lens for aphakia: long-term corneal endothelial safety study.

Anas Anbari1, Damian B Lake.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report 2 years follow-up experience, corneal endothelial cell loss results, and A constant used in retroiridis-fixated iris-claw aphakic intraocular lens (IOL) secondary implantation to correct aphakia in eyes without adequate capsule support.
METHODS: In this prospective, interventional, clinical case series, 16 consecutive eyes of 14 patients (13 adults and 1 child) underwent retroiridis implantation of Artisan iris-claw aphakic IOL (Ophtec BV, Groningen, the Netherlands). Outcome measures included spherical equivalent (SE) of refractive error, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) expressed as the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), endothelial cell density (ECD), and complications, including raised intraocular pressure (IOP) and pigment dispersion.
RESULTS: All eyes were followed up for 2 years postoperatively. Postoperative SE of refractive error was between -1.25 and +1.63 D in all eyes at last follow-up. The mean CDVA was 0.27 ± 0.30 logMAR preoperatively and 0.13 ± 0.21 logMAR at 2 years postoperatively (p = 0.0188). Postoperative UDVA mean was 0.31 ± 0.26 logMAR at last follow-up. Preoperative manual ECD mean of 2269 ± 611 cells/mm2 decreased postoperatively to 2002 ± 532 cells/mm2 at 2 years (p = 0.0005) (mean endothelial cell loss of 11.9 ± 2.0%). No intraoperative complications occurred. There was no significant postoperative IOP increase throughout the follow-up. Iris pigment precipitates on the IOLs occurred in 1 eye (6.3%). No other serious complications occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: Two-year results show that retroiridis-fixated iris-claw aphakic IOL implantation is an effective and safe method with regards to corneal endothelial cell loss, and a new A constant is suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25363856     DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5000527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1120-6721            Impact factor:   2.597


  18 in total

1.  Experience of early implantation of retropupillary iris-claw intraocular lens in childhood.

Authors:  Göran Darius Hildebrand; Kanmin Xue
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  Is an iris claw IOL a good option for correcting surgically induced aphakia in children? A review of the literature and illustrative case study.

Authors:  R Barbara; S R Rufai; N Tan; J E Self
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Clinical outcome and endothelial loss following prepupillary and retropupillary implantation of iris claw intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Ebubekir Durmus; Fehim Esen; Melda Yenerel; Huseyin Sanisoglu; Halit Oguz
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Assessment of the safety and efficacy of primary retropupillary fixation of iris-claw intraocular lenses in children with large lens subluxations.

Authors:  Anju Rastogi; Apurva Goray; Prolima Thacker
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Surgical Outcomes of Retropupillary-Fixated Iris-Claw Intraocular Lens.

Authors:  Tarannum Mansoori; Satish Gooty Agraharam; Sravanthi Sannapuri; Sunny Manwani; Nagalla Balakrishna
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-30

6.  Iris-claw, retropupillary-fixated, aphakic intraocular lens implantation for traumatic aphakia following penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Anas A Anbari
Journal:  Digit J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-07

7.  Retropupillary fixation of iris-claw lens in visual rehabilitation of aphakic eyes.

Authors:  G Jayamadhury; Sudhakar Potti; K Vinaya Kumar; R Madhu Kumar; K C Divyansh Mishra; Srinivasa Rao Nambula
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.848

8.  The posterior iris-claw lens outcome study: 6-month follow-up.

Authors:  Nana Madhukar Jare; Ashwini Ganesh Kesari; Salil S Gadkari; Madan D Deshpande
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Comparative Analysis of the Safety and Functional Outcomes of Anterior versus Retropupillary Iris-Claw IOL Fixation.

Authors:  Paolo Mora; Giacomo Calzetti; Stefania Favilla; Matteo Forlini; Salvatore Tedesco; Purva Date; Viola Tagliavini; Arturo Carta; Rino Frisina; Emilio Pedrotti; Stefano Gandolfi
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-04       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Iris-claw intraocular lens implantation: Anterior chamber versus retropupillary implantation.

Authors:  Sezer Helvaci; Selahaddin Demirduzen; Huseyin Oksuz
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.