Literature DB >> 25363733

Comparison of paricalcitol with maxacalcitol injection in Japanese hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism.

Tadao Akizawa1, Takashi Akiba2, Hideki Hirakata3, Eriko Kinugasa4, Yoshihiro Tominaga5, Masafumi Fukagawa6, Keitaro Yokoyama7, Wuyan Zhang8, Peter G Linde9, Masashi Suzuki10.   

Abstract

Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is one of the major complications of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is associated with elevated serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH). Calcitriol, a non-selective vitamin D receptor agonist (VDRA) that suppresses iPTH is used for SHPT treatment, but its use is frequently complicated by hypercalcemia. Paricalcitol, a selective VDRA, demonstrated efficacy in iPTH suppression compared to maxacalcitol in a Phase 2 study (M11-609) in Japanese subjects. The current larger Phase 3 study (M11-517), evaluated the efficacy of intravenous paricalcitol injection compared to intravenous maxacalcitol injection with respect to iPTH and calcium control using a non-inferiority primary endpoint. In this double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study, eligible Japanese CKD subjects with SHPT on hemodialysis were randomized 1:1 to receive intravenous paricalcitol or intravenous maxacalcitol injections for 12 weeks. Dynamic allocation of subjects on the basis of screening iPTH levels was used to ensure equal distribution of subjects with iPTH <500 pg/mL and ≥500 pg/mL into the two treatment groups. 255 subjects were randomized to receive paricalcitol (N = 127) or maxacalcitol (N = 128). Primary efficacy analysis indicated that 27.7% in the paricalcitol group vs. 30.5% in the maxacalcitol group (95% CI -14.34% to 8.79%, P = 0.353) achieved target iPTH in the last 3 weeks without hypercalcemia during treatment, failing to achieve the non-inferiority margin of -5% that was set based upon agreement with the PMDA. Both intravenous paricalcitol and maxacalcitol were effective in reducing iPTH and provided similar safety profiles; however, non-inferiority for paricalcitol vs. maxacalcitol was not demonstrated.
© 2014 The Authors. Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis © 2014 International Society for Apheresis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic Kidney Disease; Maxacalcitol; Paricalcitol; Secondary Hyperparathyroidism; Vitamin D

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25363733     DOI: 10.1111/1744-9987.12242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Apher Dial        ISSN: 1744-9979            Impact factor:   1.762


  5 in total

1.  Case report: Electron microscopic evaluation of bone from a patient treated with cinacalcet hydrochloride, maxacalcitol, and alfacalcidol for hyperparathyroid bone disease with secondary hyperparathyroidism.

Authors:  A Yajima; K Tsuchiya; L F Bonewald; M Inaba; Y Tominaga; T Tanizawa; A Ito; K Nitta
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Vitamin D: Metabolism, Molecular Mechanism of Action, and Pleiotropic Effects.

Authors:  Sylvia Christakos; Puneet Dhawan; Annemieke Verstuyf; Lieve Verlinden; Geert Carmeliet
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Comparative efficacy and safety of paricalcitol versus vitamin D receptor activators for dialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yifeng Xie; Peiling Su; Yifan Sun; Hongsheng Zhang; Rong Zhao; Liang Li; Lanfen Meng
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 2.388

4.  Efficacy and safety of paricalcitol in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Ling-Yun Liu; Ye Jia; Mei-Yan Wu; Yan-Yan Sun; Fu-Zhe Ma
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 4.162

5.  Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Parathyroid Hyperplasia: Single Session vs. Two-Session for Effect on Hypocalcemia.

Authors:  Zeng Zeng; Cheng-Zhong Peng; Ji-Bin Liu; Yi-Wen Li; Hong-Feng He; Qiao-Hong Hu; Bo Lin; Xiao-Gang Shen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.