Literature DB >> 25363432

A comparison of lumboperitoneal and ventriculoperitoneal shunting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: an analysis of economic impact and complications using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Richard P Menger1, David E Connor, Jai Deep Thakur, Ashish Sonig, Elainea Smith, Bharat Guthikonda, Anil Nanda.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Complications following lumboperitoneal (LP) shunting have been reported in 18% to 85% of cases. The need for multiple revision surgeries, development of iatrogenic Chiari malformation, and frequent wound complications have prompted many to abandon this procedure altogether for the treatment of idiopathic benign intracranial hypertension (pseudotumor cerebri), in favor of ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunting. A direct comparison of the complication rates and health care charges between first-choice LP versus VP shunting is presented.
METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was queried for all patients with the diagnosis of benign intracranial hypertension (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, code 348.2) from 2005 to 2009. These data were stratified by operative intervention, with demographic and hospitalization charge data generated for each.
RESULTS: A weighted sample of 4480 patients was identified as having the diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), with 2505 undergoing first-time VP shunt placement and 1754 undergoing initial LP shunt placement. Revision surgery occurred in 3.9% of admissions (n = 98) for VP shunts and in 7.0% of admissions (n = 123) for LP shunts (p < 0.0001). Ventriculoperitoneal shunts were placed at teaching institutions in 83.8% of cases, compared with only 77.3% of first-time LP shunts (p < 0.0001). Mean hospital length of stay (LOS) significantly differed between primary VP (3 days) and primary LP shunt procedures (4 days, p < 0.0001). The summed charges for the revisions of 92 VP shunts ($3,453,956) and those of the 6 VP shunt removals ($272,484) totaled $3,726,352 over 5 years for the study population. The summed charges for revision of 70 LP shunts ($2,229,430) and those of the 53 LP shunt removals ($3,125,569) totaled $5,408,679 over 5 years for the study population.
CONCLUSIONS: The presented results appear to call into question the selection of LP shunt placement as primary treatment for IIH, as this procedure is associated with a significantly greater likelihood of need for shunt revision, increased LOS, and greater overall charges to the health care system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CI = confidence interval; ICD-9 = International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision; IIH = idiopathic intracranial hypertension; LOS = length of stay; LP = lumboperitoneal; NIS = Nationwide Inpatient Sample; OR = odds ratio; VP = ventriculoperitoneal; health care charges; intracranial hypertension; lumboperitoneal shunt; socioeconomic outcomes; ventriculoperitoneal shunt

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25363432     DOI: 10.3171/2014.8.FOCUS14436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  10 in total

1.  Indications for Surgery for Obesity and Weight-Related Diseases: Position Statements from the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO).

Authors:  Maurizio De Luca; Luigi Angrisani; Jacques Himpens; Luca Busetto; Nicola Scopinaro; Rudolf Weiner; Alberto Sartori; Christine Stier; Muffazal Lakdawala; Aparna G Bhasker; Henry Buchwald; John Dixon; Sonja Chiappetta; Hans-Christian Kolberg; Gema Frühbeck; David B Sarwer; Michel Suter; Emanuele Soricelli; Mattias Blüher; Ramon Vilallonga; Arya Sharma; Scott Shikora
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 2.  Neuroendovascular Cerebral Sinus Stenting in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Authors:  Fawaz Al-Mufti; Vincent Dodson; Krishna Amuluru; Jessy Walia; Ethan Wajswol; Rolla Nuoman; Irwin A Keller; Steven Schonfeld; Sudipta Roychowdhury; Gaurav Gupta
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2019-06-04

3.  Shunt infection in a single institute: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Bing Qin; Gao Chen; Jingyin Chen
Journal:  Chin Neurosurg J       Date:  2018-05-07

Review 4.  Neurosurgical CSF Diversion in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Geraint J Sunderland; Michael D Jenkinson; Elizabeth J Conroy; Carrol Gamble; Conor L Mallucci
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-26

Review 5.  Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: ongoing clinical challenges and future prospects.

Authors:  Parunyou Julayanont; Amputch Karukote; Doungporn Ruthirago; Deepa Panikkath; Ragesh Panikkath
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.133

6.  Spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leak of the sphenoid sinus mimicking allergic rhinitis, and managed successfully by a ventriculoperitoneal shunt: a case report.

Authors:  Youssef Darouassi; Mohamed Mliha Touati; Mehdi Chihani; Ali Akhaddar; Haddou Ammar; Brahim Bouaity
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2016-11-03

7.  Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Alone for Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea With Neuroendocrine Alterations in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Deqing Peng; Kaichuang Yang; Cheng Wu; Faliang Gao; Weijun Sun; Gang Lu
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Novel telemetric pressure monitoring in lumbar theca.

Authors:  Sogha Khawari; Kanza Tariq; Lucia Darie; Eleanor Moncur; Ahmed Toma; Laurence Watkins
Journal:  Brain Spine       Date:  2022-03-31

Review 9.  Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: consensus guidelines on management.

Authors:  Susan P Mollan; Brendan Davies; Nick C Silver; Simon Shaw; Conor L Mallucci; Benjamin R Wakerley; Anita Krishnan; Swarupsinh V Chavda; Satheesh Ramalingam; Julie Edwards; Krystal Hemmings; Michelle Williamson; Michael A Burdon; Ghaniah Hassan-Smith; Kathleen Digre; Grant T Liu; Rigmor Højland Jensen; Alexandra J Sinclair
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  An experience with ventriculoperitoneal shunting at keen's point for hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Muhammad Junaid; Mamoon Ahmed; Mamoon Ur Rashid
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.088

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.