| Literature DB >> 25363105 |
Elli Nur Hayati1, Maria Emmelin, Malin Eriksson.
Abstract
Since the launch of a Zero Tolerance Policy in Indonesia, several policies to address domestic violence have been enacted. The obligation of local governments to establish service units for women survivors of domestic violence is one of them. Since domestic violence is a sensitive and complex issue in Indonesia it is important to understand how governmentally regulated services function in practice. This case study aimed to explore challenges faced by a local service agency in managing service provision for women survivors of domestic violence in rural Indonesia. Data from one focus group discussion (12 participants), four individual interviews, six short narratives, two days of participant observation, as well as archive reviews were collected. All data were analyzed using Grounded Theory Situational Analysis. The major challenge faced by the local agency was the low priority that was given them by the local authorities, mirrored also in low involvement by the assigned volunteers in the daily service. The study also identified a gap between the socio-cultural arena and the law & policy arena that needs to be bridged to avoid that the two arenas address domestic violence in a contradictory way. Budget allocation to support the sustainability of the daily routines of service agencies has to be given priority. There is also a need for careful considerations regarding the composition of personnel involved within daily management of service agencies addressing domestic violence. To bridge the gap between the legal systems and traditional cultural values, culturally adjusted alternative justice systems could be developed to increase women's access to legal support.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25363105 PMCID: PMC4825485 DOI: 10.5539/gjhs.v6n6p214
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glob J Health Sci ISSN: 1916-9736
The ordered situational map of the management and practice in the service agency
| Elements | Contents | |
|---|---|---|
| Bupati, the officer | ||
| Civil servants, the representative volunteers, Teachers, Naib (KUA officers), Policy makers, Police Officers, midwives, health attendants, Politicians | ||
| District Health Office, Religious Affairs Office, Police Department, Hospital and Clinics, Schools, House of Representatives, Educational Office, NGOs | ||
| Pregnant women, teenage girls, parents, women survivors of violence, villagers at risks, youth | ||
| Pregnant women, teenage girls, parents, women survivors of violence, villagers at risks, youth | ||
| Education curricula, Presidential Decree number 9/2000 on Gender mainstreaming regulation, Law number 23/2004 (Anti DV act), District Head’s decree on the formation of P2TP2A | ||
| Poverty, bad familial finance management, financial hardship, hunger, lack of food, jobless | ||
| Taboo to disclose DV, women’s permit for husband’s polygamy, disempowered traditions, patriarchal, girl child marriage, better to have a status as “widow” rather than status as “belated married”, provocative dressing, lack of access for women of being heard, wife disobey, lack of awareness to report, threat toward disclosure on DV | ||
| Monitoring and evaluation, coordination, well plan, maintain the good performance, leadership, collaboration/cooperation, irregular shift of volunteers, shelter facility, counseling room | ||
| Routine public lectures, dissemination, public dialogue, radio program, public lectures by Bupati, advocacy for the district regulation on free of charge medical service for women survivors, survivors’ repatriation, capacity building for P2TP2A officers, improving the minimum into maximum standard, improving the infrastructure | ||
| No autonomy for P2TP2A, no clear fund for operational P2TP2A, bureaucracy, double/triple agencies affiliated, gender mainstreaming at the government program, district regulation, lack of commitment among the policy makers, lack of financial support from GO, huge structure of P2TP2A, fulfillment of women’s rights, shifting responsibilities, stakeholders’ commitment | ||
| Happy, glad, satisfy, disappoint, dissatisfy, uncomfortable, dislike, concerned, shame, willingness, impatience, impulsivity, angry of being reported, revenge | ||
| Dishonesty, restlessness, altruistic motive, extramarital affair, lack of openness, low tolerance toward frustration, lack of good role model, silence for the sake of harmony, egoism, attention, take the lessons learned, stubborn, lack of understanding, low commitment in marriage, weak in struggle, threat to divorce, authoritarian parenting style, narrow mindedness | ||
| Full time staff VS non full time staff/representational staff; Bupati’s direct involvement at the programmatic level VS Bupati’s indirect involvement through district regulation; Disclosure about domestic violence VS silent about domestic violence; More report to the Police VS inconsistency in the Indonesia law system; Minimum standard VS maximum standard; Good network collaboration VS lack of communication within network | ||
Figure 1Social worlds/arenas map illustrating arenas and actors influencing the management of the service agency